From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital; Department of Plastic Surgery, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; Mansoura University, Faculty of Medicine; Department of Surgery, University of Texas at San Antonio; Division of Burn and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch; and Dallas Plastic Surgery Institute.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Sep 1;150(3):684e-690e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009442. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
The 2020 to 2021 residency and fellowship application cycles were profoundly affected by the introduction of virtual interviews. The authors investigated the impact the virtual format had on plastic surgery residency and fellowship interviews from the perspectives of program directors.
Surveys were sent to program directors of integrated plastic surgery residency and fellowship programs to ascertain their perspectives regarding the virtual format's impact on residency and fellowship interviews. Program directors were stratified into residency and fellowship cohorts, and comparative analysis was performed.
Ninety-two program directors, 28 from integrated plastic surgery residency programs and 64 from fellowship programs, completed our survey (35 percent). Compared to in-person interviews, virtual interviews were reported to be more economical and time efficient by program directors of residency (100 percent and 46 percent, respectively) and fellowship programs (97 percent and 48 percent, respectively). Consequentially, 36 percent and 47 percent of residency and fellowship programs were able to interview more applicants, respectively. Program directors of residency and fellowship programs reported that virtual interviews hindered their ability to assess applicants' fit with the program (75 percent and 63 percent, respectively), personality and communication skills (75 percent and 64 percent, respectively), and commitment to the field, along with their ability to function as a trainee (57 percent and 50 percent, respectively). Overall, 71 percent of program directors of residency and 58 percent of program directors of fellowship programs preferred in-person interviews. The majority of residency (71 percent) and fellowship (56 percent) program directors intend to conduct both in-person and virtual interviews in future application cycles ( p = 0.12).
Despite preferring in-person interviews, program directors intend to host both in-person and virtual interviews in future application cycles. It remains to be seen how virtual interviews will be used moving forward.
2020 年至 2021 年的住院医师和研究员申请周期受到了引入虚拟面试的深远影响。作者从项目主管的角度调查了虚拟形式对整形外科研修和研究员面试的影响。
向综合整形外科研修和研究员项目的项目主管发送了调查,以确定他们对虚拟形式对住院医师和研究员面试的影响的看法。项目主管分为住院医师和研究员两个队列,并进行了比较分析。
92 名项目主管(28 名来自综合整形外科研修项目,64 名来自研究员项目)完成了我们的调查(35%)。与面对面面试相比,住院医师(100%和 46%)和研究员(97%和 48%)项目主管报告虚拟面试更经济、更省时。因此,分别有 36%和 47%的住院医师和研究员项目能够面试更多的申请人。住院医师和研究员项目主管报告说,虚拟面试阻碍了他们评估申请人与项目的契合度(分别为 75%和 63%)、个性和沟通技巧(分别为 75%和 64%)以及对该领域的承诺的能力,以及他们作为学员的能力(分别为 57%和 50%)。总体而言,71%的住院医师项目主管和 58%的研究员项目主管更喜欢面对面面试。大多数住院医师(71%)和研究员(56%)项目主管打算在未来的申请周期中同时进行面对面和虚拟面试(p=0.12)。
尽管他们更喜欢面对面面试,但项目主管打算在未来的申请周期中同时举办面对面和虚拟面试。虚拟面试将如何继续使用还有待观察。