• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸主动脉腔内修复术后移植物晚期迁移:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Late Endograft Migration After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Clinic of Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Feb;31(1):7-18. doi: 10.1177/15266028221109455. Epub 2022 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1177/15266028221109455
PMID:35822261
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10773166/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this systematic review was to report the cumulative incidence of endograft migration (EM), as well as the morbidity, reintervention rates, and mortality related to EM. This study aimed to provide evidence-based data on patient-relevant sequelae of EM after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) performed using contemporary aortic endografts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic electronic search of literature in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed. The pooled synthesis of outcomes was performed using the inverse variance method.

RESULTS

Seven prospective non-randomized and 4 retrospective studies, including a total of 1783 patients presenting 70 EMs, were considered for the quantitative analysis. The pooled rate of EM was 4% (95% CI, 2%-7%; range, 0.2%-11%; I2=82%); pooled morbidity rate was 31% (95% CI, 12%-59%; range, 0%-100%; I2=64%) and pooled reintervention rate was 32% (95% CI, 15%-56%; range, 0%-100%; I2=55%). The pooled mortality rate due to EM was 5% (95% CI, 1%-21%; range, 0%-40%; I2=24%).

CONCLUSION

For the first time, this meta-analysis provides pooled reference estimates of EM after TEVAR. Thus, the results hold the potential to further characterize EM after TEVAR. The clinical relevance of EM is underlined by its association with high rates of endoleak-related morbidity, reintervention, and mortality. Close standardized surveillance after TEVAR for early detection of EM and prophylaxis of its sequelae is essential.

摘要

目的

本系统评价的目的是报告移植物内漏(EM)的累积发生率,以及与 EM 相关的发病率、再介入率和死亡率。本研究旨在提供基于证据的关于使用当代主动脉内支架进行胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)后 EM 对患者的相关后果的数据。

材料和方法

通过 MEDLINE(通过 PubMed)、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库进行了系统的电子文献搜索。使用逆方差法对结果进行汇总分析。

结果

纳入了 7 项前瞻性非随机对照研究和 4 项回顾性研究,共纳入 1783 例患者的 70 例 EM。EM 的总发生率为 4%(95%CI,2%-7%;范围,0.2%-11%;I2=82%);合并发病率为 31%(95%CI,12%-59%;范围,0%-100%;I2=64%),再介入率为 32%(95%CI,15%-56%;范围,0%-100%;I2=55%)。因 EM 导致的死亡率为 5%(95%CI,1%-21%;范围,0%-40%;I2=24%)。

结论

这是首次对 TEVAR 后 EM 进行荟萃分析,提供了 EM 的汇总参考估计值。因此,结果有可能进一步描述 TEVAR 后 EM。EM 与较高的内漏相关发病率、再介入和死亡率相关,突出了其临床重要性。对 TEVAR 后进行密切的标准化监测,以便早期发现 EM 并预防其后果至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b1d/10773166/7750f46fcc22/10.1177_15266028221109455-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b1d/10773166/d94045cda9c6/10.1177_15266028221109455-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b1d/10773166/fdd887bff341/10.1177_15266028221109455-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b1d/10773166/38c6645c444f/10.1177_15266028221109455-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b1d/10773166/96ce8e7d9b9f/10.1177_15266028221109455-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b1d/10773166/7750f46fcc22/10.1177_15266028221109455-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b1d/10773166/d94045cda9c6/10.1177_15266028221109455-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b1d/10773166/fdd887bff341/10.1177_15266028221109455-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b1d/10773166/38c6645c444f/10.1177_15266028221109455-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b1d/10773166/96ce8e7d9b9f/10.1177_15266028221109455-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b1d/10773166/7750f46fcc22/10.1177_15266028221109455-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Late Endograft Migration After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.胸主动脉腔内修复术后移植物晚期迁移:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Feb;31(1):7-18. doi: 10.1177/15266028221109455. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
2
Cardiac and Aortic Modifications After Endovascular Repair for Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury: A Systematic Review.胸主动脉钝性损伤血管内修复术后的心脏和主动脉改变:系统评价。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 Aug-Sep;64(2-3):176-187. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 May 7.
3
Open aneurysmorraphy following branched and fenestrated endovascular repair of complex thoracic aneurysms.复杂胸主动脉瘤分支及开窗腔内修复术后开放性动脉瘤修补术
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Feb;81(2):300-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.09.033. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
4
Coverage of the Coeliac Artery During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.胸主动脉腔内修复术中腹腔动脉覆盖:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 Jun;63(6):828-837. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.02.026. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
5
Aortic remodeling, distal stent-graft induced new entry and endoleak following frozen elephant trunk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.主动脉重塑、冰冻象鼻术后远端支架移植物导致的新入口和内漏:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Card Surg. 2022 Nov;37(11):3848-3862. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16918. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
6
Current Evidence on Management of Aortic Stent-graft Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.主动脉覆膜支架感染管理的当前证据:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;51:306-313. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.02.038. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
7
Systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence in endograft therapy vs medical treatment for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.系统评价和荟萃分析目前腔内治疗与药物治疗非复杂性 B 型主动脉夹层的证据。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Oct;76(4):1099-1108.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.876. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis of association of prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage in preventing spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.胸主动脉腔内修复术后预防性脑脊液引流预防脊髓缺血相关性的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Apr;75(4):1478-1489.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.050. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
9
A systematic review and meta-analysis of proximal aortic neck dilatation after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.血管腔内腹主动脉瘤修复术后近端主动脉颈部扩张的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Mar;77(3):941-956.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.182. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of stroke rates in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysm and type B dissection.对接受胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗降主动脉夹层动脉瘤和 B 型夹层的患者的卒中发生率进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jul;76(1):292-301.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.02.031. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic Morphology of the Ascending Aorta and Its Implications for Proximal Landing in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.升主动脉的动态形态及其对胸主动脉腔内修复术中近端锚定区的影响
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 21;12(1):70. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010070.

本文引用的文献

1
A 10-Year Single-Center Experience With the GORE TAG Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft in the Treatment of Thoracic Aortic Disease.10 年单中心应用戈尔顺应性胸主动脉覆膜支架治疗胸主动脉疾病经验
J Endovasc Ther. 2022 Jun;29(3):370-380. doi: 10.1177/15266028211049340. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
2
Long-term outcomes of the conformable TAG thoracic endoprosthesis in a prospective multicenter trial.前瞻性多中心试验中可塑形 TAG 胸主动脉覆膜支架的长期结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Nov;74(5):1491-1498. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.063. Epub 2021 May 20.
3
Outcome comparison of thoracic endovascular aortic repair performed outside versus inside proximal landing zone length recommendation.
不在近端锚定区长度推荐范围内行胸主动脉腔内修复术与在推荐范围内行该术的疗效比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Dec;72(6):1883-1890. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.03.033. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
4
Determining the Optimal Proximal Landing Zone for TEVAR in the Aortic Arch: Comparing the Occurrence of the Bird-Beak Phenomenon in Zone 0 vs Zones 1 and 2.确定主动脉弓 TEVAR 的最佳近端着陆区:比较 0 区与 1 区和 2 区鸟嘴现象的发生情况。
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Jun;27(3):368-376. doi: 10.1177/1526602820914269. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
5
One-Year Results From the SURPASS Observational Registry of the CTAG Stent-Graft With the Active Control System.带有主动控制系统的 CTAG 支架移植物的 SURPASS 观察性注册研究的一年结果。
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Jun;27(3):421-427. doi: 10.1177/1526602820913007. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
6
Reinterventions in the modern era of thoracic endovascular aortic repair.胸主动脉腔内修复术现代时代的再介入治疗。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Feb;71(2):408-422. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.484. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
7
Endograft migration after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.胸主动脉腔内修复术后移植物迁移。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 May;69(5):1387-1394. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.073. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
8
Aortic Anatomy and Complications of the Proximal Sealing Zone after Endovascular Treatment of the Thoracic Aorta.胸主动脉腔内治疗后主动脉解剖结构及近端密封区并发症
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Apr;48:141-150. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.09.029. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
9
Optimal literature search for systematic reviews in surgery.外科系统评价的最佳文献检索
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Feb;403(1):119-129. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1646-x. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
10
Retrograde Type A Aortic Dissection After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.胸主动脉腔内修复术后逆行性 A 型主动脉夹层:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Sep 22;6(9):e004649. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004649.