• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较新型抗生素药物对碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科临床分离株的活性。

Comparing the activity of novel antibiotic agents against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales clinical isolates.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 May;44(5):762-767. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.161. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1017/ice.2022.161
PMID:35822340
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We compared the activity of 8 novel β-lactam and tetracycline-derivative antibiotics against a cohort of clinical carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) isolates and investigated the incremental susceptibility benefit of the addition of an aminoglycoside, fluoroquinolone, or polymyxin to the β-lactam agents to assist with empiric antibiotic decision making.

METHODS

A collection of consecutive CRE clinical isolates from unique patients at 3 US hospitals (2016-2021) was assembled. Broth microdilution was performed to obtain antimicrobial susceptibility testing results. Mechanisms of carbapenem resistance were investigated through short-read and long-read whole-genome sequencing.

RESULTS

Of the 603 CRE isolates, 276 (46%) were carbapenemase producing and 327 (54%) were non-carbapenemase producing, respectively. The organisms most frequently identified were (38%), complex (26%), and (16%). We obtained the following percent susceptibility to novel β-lactam agents: ceftazidime-avibactam (95%), meropenem-vaborbactam (92%), imipenem-relebactam (84%), and cefiderocol (92%). Aminoglycosides and the polymyxins provided greater incremental coverage as second agents, compared to fluoroquinolones. Amikacin and plazomicin exhibited the greatest additive value. Ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and cefiderocol were active against 94% of the 220 KPC-producing isolates. Cefiderocol was active against 83% of the 29 NDM-producing isolates. Ceftazidime-avibactam had 100% activity against the 9 OXA-48-like-producing isolates. Tigecycline had the highest activity compared to other tetracyclines against KPC, NDM, or OXA-48-like-producing isolates.

CONCLUSION

Selection among novel agents requires a nuanced understanding of the molecular epidemiology of CRE. This work provides insights into the comparative activity of novel agents and the additive value of a second antibiotic for empiric antibiotic decision making.

摘要

目的

我们比较了 8 种新型β-内酰胺类和四环素衍生物抗生素对一组临床碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科(CRE)分离株的活性,并研究了在β-内酰胺类抗生素中添加氨基糖苷类、氟喹诺酮类或多黏菌素类抗生素以协助经验性抗生素决策的增量药敏获益。

方法

收集了来自美国 3 家医院(2016-2021 年)的独特患者的连续 CRE 临床分离株。通过肉汤微量稀释法获得抗菌药物敏感性测试结果。通过短读长和长读长全基因组测序研究碳青霉烯类耐药的机制。

结果

在 603 株 CRE 分离株中,分别有 276 株(46%)产碳青霉烯酶和 327 株(54%)非产碳青霉烯酶。最常见的分离株分别为 (38%)、 复合体(26%)和 (16%)。我们获得了新型β-内酰胺类药物的以下药敏率:头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(95%)、美罗培南-维巴坦(92%)、亚胺培南-雷巴坦(84%)和头孢地尔(92%)。与氟喹诺酮类药物相比,氨基糖苷类和多黏菌素类药物作为二线药物提供了更大的增量覆盖范围。阿米卡星和黏菌素表现出最大的附加价值。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦、美罗培南-维巴坦和头孢地尔对 220 株产 KPC 株的活性均为 94%。头孢地尔对 29 株产 NDM 株的活性为 83%。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦对 9 株产 OXA-48 样株的活性为 100%。与产 KPC、NDM 或 OXA-48 样株相比,替加环素对其他四环素类药物具有最高的活性。

结论

新型药物的选择需要对 CRE 的分子流行病学有细致的了解。这项工作提供了对新型药物比较活性的深入了解,以及在经验性抗生素决策中添加第二种抗生素的附加价值。

相似文献

1
Comparing the activity of novel antibiotic agents against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales clinical isolates.比较新型抗生素药物对碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科临床分离株的活性。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 May;44(5):762-767. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.161. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
2
Comparative Activities of Novel Therapeutic Agents against Molecularly Characterized Clinical Carbapenem-Resistant Isolates.新型治疗药物对分子鉴定的临床碳青霉烯类耐药分离株的活性比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0100223. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01002-23. Epub 2023 May 15.
3
Epidemiology and in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, eravacycline, plazomicin, and comparators against Greek carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates.希腊产碳青霉烯酶肺炎克雷伯菌分离株的流行病学和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦、美罗培南-法硼巴坦、亚胺培南-雷利巴坦、依拉环素、硫酸普拉米星及对照药物的体外活性
Infection. 2022 Apr;50(2):467-474. doi: 10.1007/s15010-021-01735-1. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
4
Activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam against carbapenemase-negative carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates from US hospitals.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦、美罗培南/沃巴坦和亚胺培南/雷利巴坦对美国医院碳青霉烯酶阴性碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科分离株的活性。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021 Nov;58(5):106439. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106439. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
5
Antimicrobial activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against KPC-2-producing Enterobacterales: a cross-combination and dose-escalation titration study with relebactam and vaborbactam.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦对产 KPC-2 的肠杆菌科的抗菌活性:雷巴他定和沃巴他定联合用药及剂量递增滴定研究。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):e0034424. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00344-24. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
6
Efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam and plazomicin on carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦和硫酸帕拉米韦对碳青霉烯类耐药肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠埃希菌的疗效。
Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2024 Jun 5;71(2):110-120. doi: 10.1556/030.2024.02292. Print 2024 Jul 2.
7
Activity of aztreonam-avibactam against Enterobacterales resistant to recently approved beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations collected in Europe, Latin America, and the Asia-Pacific Region (2020-2022).在欧洲、拉丁美洲和亚太地区(2020-2022 年)收集的对最近批准的β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合耐药的肠杆菌科的阿维巴坦-阿唑巴坦活性。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2024 Apr;63(4):107113. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107113. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
8
Meropenem-Vaborbactam Activity against U.S. Multidrug-Resistant Strains, Including Carbapenem-Resistant Isolates.美罗培南-法硼巴坦对包括碳青霉烯类耐药分离株在内的美国多种耐药菌株的活性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 14;11(1):e0450722. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04507-22. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
9
Imipenem-Relebactam Susceptibility in Isolates Recovered from ICU Patients from Spain and Portugal (SUPERIOR and STEP Studies).西班牙和葡萄牙 ICU 患者分离株的亚胺培南-雷巴他定药敏研究(SUPERIOR 和 STEP 研究)。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0292722. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02927-22. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
10
Ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relebactam activities against multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales from United States Medical Centers (2018-2022).头孢他啶-阿维巴坦、美罗培南-维巴坦和亚胺培南-雷巴坦对美国医疗中心多重耐药肠杆菌科的活性(2018-2022 年)。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023 Jun;106(2):115945. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2023.115945. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuous infusion versus intermittent dosing of ceftazidime/avibactam in critically ill patients with OXA-48 or infections: a single-center randomized open-label trial (ZAVICONT). Rationale and design.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦持续输注与间歇给药治疗产OXA-48或[此处原文缺失相关信息]感染的重症患者:一项单中心随机开放标签试验(ZAVICONT)。原理与设计。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 7;16:1618987. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1618987. eCollection 2025.
2
Molecular epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Gauteng South Africa.南非豪登省产碳青霉烯酶肺炎克雷伯菌的分子流行病学研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 9;14(1):27337. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70910-9.
3
Klebsiella pneumoniae with carbapenemases: high prevalence of sequence type 307 with bla in South African community hospitals.
产碳青霉烯酶肺炎克雷伯菌:南非社区医院中高流行的携带 bla 的序列型 307。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Nov;43(11):2239-2244. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04947-z. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
4
Rates of resistance and heteroresistance to newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales.耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌对新型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂的耐药率和异质性耐药率。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2024 Mar 21;6(2):dlae048. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae048. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Global Resistance of Imipenem/Relebactam against Gram-Negative Bacilli: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.亚胺培南/瑞来巴坦对革兰氏阴性杆菌的全球耐药性:系统评价和荟萃分析
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2023 Oct 28;100:100723. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2023.100723. eCollection 2024.
6
Rationale and evidence for the use of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol in critically ill patients.新型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合及头孢地尔在重症患者中应用的理论依据与证据
Ann Intensive Care. 2023 Jul 18;13(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01153-6.
7
An NDM-Producing Clinical Isolate Exhibiting Resistance to Cefiderocol and the Combination of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam: Another Step Toward Pan-β-Lactam Resistance.一株产NDM的临床分离株对头孢地尔、头孢他啶-阿维巴坦合剂及氨曲南耐药:迈向泛β-内酰胺耐药的又一步。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 May 17;10(7):ofad276. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad276. eCollection 2023 Jul.
8
Novel Antimicrobial Agents for Gram-Negative Pathogens.用于革兰氏阴性病原体的新型抗菌剂。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Apr 16;12(4):761. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12040761.
9
Surveillance and Stewardship: Where Infection Prevention and Antimicrobial Stewardship Intersect.监测与管理:感染预防与抗菌药物管理的交叉领域
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Mar 29;10(4):ofad176. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad176. eCollection 2023 Apr.
10
Cefiderocol, a Siderophore Cephalosporin, as a Treatment Option for Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales.头孢地尔,一种铁载体头孢菌素,作为耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌所致感染的一种治疗选择。
Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Mar;12(3):777-806. doi: 10.1007/s40121-023-00773-6. Epub 2023 Feb 25.