• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于初级保健国际分类构建和验证发病率指数。

Construction and validation of a morbidity index based on the International Classification of Primary Care.

机构信息

National Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Jun;40(2):305-312. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2097617. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1080/02813432.2022.2097617
PMID:35822650
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9397422/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In epidemiological studies it is often necessary to describe morbidity. The aim of the present study is to construct and validate a morbidity index based on the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-2).

DESIGN AND SETTING

This is a cohort study based on linked data from national registries. An ICPC morbidity index was constructed based on a list of longstanding health problems in earlier published Scottish data from general practice and adapted to diagnostic ICPC-2 codes recorded in Norwegian general practice 2015 - 2017.

SUBJECTS

The index was constructed among Norwegian born people only ( = 4 509 382) and validated in a different population, foreign-born people living in Norway ( = 959 496).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Predictive ability for death in 2018 in these populations was compared with the Charlson index. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify morbidities with the highest odds ratios (OR) for death and predictive ability for different combinations of morbidities was estimated by the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC).

RESULTS

An index based on 18 morbidities was found to be optimal, predicting mortality with an AUC of 0.78, slightly better than the Charlson index (AUC 0.77). External validation in a foreign-born population yielded an AUC of 0.76 for the ICPC morbidity index and 0.77 for the Charlson index.

CONCLUSIONS

The ICPC morbidity index performs equal to the Charlson index and can be recommended for use in data materials collected in primary health care.Key pointsThis is the first morbidity index based on the International Classification of Primary Care, 2 edition (ICPC-2)It predicted mortality equal to the Charlson index and validated acceptably in a different populationThe ICPC morbidity index can be used as an adjustment variable in epidemiological research in primary care databases.

摘要

目的

在流行病学研究中,通常需要描述发病率。本研究旨在构建和验证基于初级保健国际分类(ICPC-2)的发病率指数。

设计和设置

这是一项基于国家登记处相关数据的队列研究。根据以前发表的苏格兰普通科医生数据中列出的长期健康问题,构建了一个 ICPC 发病率指数,并根据 2015-2017 年挪威普通科医生记录的诊断 ICPC-2 代码进行了调整。

对象

该指数仅在挪威出生的人群中构建(n=4509382),并在不同人群(居住在挪威的外国出生人群,n=959496)中进行验证。

主要结果

比较了这些人群中 2018 年死亡的预测能力,与 Charlson 指数进行比较。采用多因素逻辑回归确定病死率最高的发病率,并通过接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)估计不同发病率组合的预测能力。

结果

发现基于 18 种疾病的指数是最佳的,预测死亡率的 AUC 为 0.78,略优于 Charlson 指数(AUC 0.77)。在外国出生人群中的外部验证中,ICPC 发病率指数的 AUC 为 0.76,Charlson 指数为 0.77。

结论

ICPC 发病率指数与 Charlson 指数相当,可推荐用于初级保健数据资料中。

关键点

这是第一个基于初级保健国际分类,第二版(ICPC-2)的发病率指数。它预测死亡率与 Charlson 指数相当,并在不同人群中得到可接受的验证。ICPC 发病率指数可作为初级保健数据库中流行病学研究的调整变量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0019/9397422/52652e038b2d/IPRI_A_2097617_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0019/9397422/52652e038b2d/IPRI_A_2097617_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0019/9397422/52652e038b2d/IPRI_A_2097617_F0001_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Construction and validation of a morbidity index based on the International Classification of Primary Care.基于初级保健国际分类构建和验证发病率指数。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Jun;40(2):305-312. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2097617. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
2
Reliability measurement and ICD-10 validation of ICPC-2 for coding/classification of diagnoses/health problems in an African primary care setting.在非洲初级保健环境中,对用于诊断/健康问题编码/分类的ICPC - 2进行可靠性测量和ICD - 10验证。
Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 23;35(4):406-411. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx132.
3
ICPC as a standard classification in Norway.国际初级保健分类法在挪威作为一种标准分类法。
Fam Pract. 1996 Aug;13(4):391-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.4.391.
4
Sixteen years of ICPC use in Norwegian primary care: looking through the facts.十六年的国际大学生程序设计竞赛在挪威初级保健中的应用:透过事实看本质。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Feb 24;10:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-11.
5
The International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC): new applications in research and computer-based patient records in family practice.国际初级保健分类法(ICPC):在家庭医疗的研究及基于计算机的患者记录中的新应用
Fam Pract. 1996 Jun;13(3):294-302. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.3.294.
6
Identifying musculoskeletal conditions in electronic medical records: a prevalence and validation study using the Deliver Primary Healthcare Information (DELPHI) database.在电子病历中识别肌肉骨骼疾病:一项使用初级医疗保健信息传递(DELPHI)数据库的患病率及验证研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 3;20(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2568-2.
7
The conversion between ICPC and ICD-10. Requirements for a family of classification systems in the next decade.国际初级保健分类(ICPC)与国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)之间的转换。未来十年对一系列分类系统的要求。
Fam Pract. 1992 Sep;9(3):340-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/9.3.340.
8
Which barriers affect morbidity registration performance of GP trainees and trainers?哪些障碍会影响全科住院医师培训医师和培训师的发病登记表现?
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Aug;82(8):708-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
9
Research methodology: Coding perceived morbidity in general practice--an evaluation of the Read Classification and the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC).研究方法:对全科医疗中感知到的发病率进行编码——对瑞德分类法和国际初级保健分类法(ICPC)的评估。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1997 Sep;6(5):325-30. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1557(199709/10)6:5<325::AID-PDS283>3.0.CO;2-B.
10
Anxiety problems in children and adolescents: a population-based cohort study on incidence and management in Dutch primary care.儿童和青少年的焦虑问题:荷兰初级保健中基于人群的队列研究发病率和管理。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 May 26;72(719):e405-e412. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0557. Print 2022 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on general practitioner contacts among patients with common and at-risk diagnoses: a Norwegian registry-based study.2019年冠状病毒病大流行限制措施对患有常见及高危诊断疾病患者与全科医生接触的影响:一项基于挪威登记处的研究
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2025 Sep;43(3):660-671. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2025.2491762. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
2
Patient characteristics and healthcare use for high-cost patients with musculoskeletal disorders in Norway: a cohort study.挪威肌肉骨骼疾病高成本患者的特征及医疗保健利用情况:一项队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1583. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12051-3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Continuity in general practice as predictor of mortality, acute hospitalisation, and use of out-of-hours care: a registry-based observational study in Norway.一般实践中的连续性作为死亡率、急性住院和非工作时间护理使用的预测因素:挪威基于登记的观察性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jan 27;72(715):e84-e90. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0340. Print 2022 Feb.
2
Measuring multimorbidity beyond counting diseases: systematic review of community and population studies and guide to index choice.测量多重疾病:社区和人群研究的系统评价及指标选择指南。
BMJ. 2020 Feb 18;368:m160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m160.
3
Development and validation of the Cambridge Multimorbidity Score.
Variation in general practitioners' follow-up of depressed patients starting antidepressant medication: a register-based cohort study.
开始服用抗抑郁药物的抑郁症患者的全科医生随访差异:一项基于登记的队列研究。
Fam Pract. 2025 Feb 7;42(2). doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmae063.
4
Continuity and breaches in GP care and their associations with mortality for patients with chronic disease: an observational study using Norwegian registry data.全科医疗的连续性与中断及其与慢性病患者死亡率的关联:一项使用挪威登记数据的观察性研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Apr 25;74(742):e347-e354. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0211. Print 2024 May.
5
How valid is a prescription-based multimorbidity index (Rx-risk) in predicting mortality in the Outcomes and Multimorbidity In Type 2 diabetes (OMIT) study? A nation-wide registry-based cohort study from Norway.基于处方的多病种指数 (Rx-risk) 在预测 Outcomes and Multimorbidity In Type 2 diabetes (OMIT) 研究中的死亡率方面有多有效?一项来自挪威的全国性基于登记的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 28;14(3):e077027. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077027.
6
Prevalence and predictors of post-COVID-19 symptoms in general practice - a registry-based nationwide study.普通科门诊中 COVID-19 后症状的流行情况和预测因素 - 一项基于登记的全国性研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Oct 25;23(1):721. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08727-6.
7
Effect of sense of coherence on long-term work participation among rehabilitation patients: a longitudinal study.应对感对康复患者长期工作参与的影响:一项纵向研究。
J Rehabil Med. 2023 Oct 19;55:jrm11982. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v55.11982.
8
Combination of health care service use and the relation to demographic and socioeconomic factors for patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a descriptive cohort study.医疗服务使用的组合与人口统计学和社会经济学因素对肌肉骨骼疾病患者的关系:一项描述性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 14;23(1):858. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09852-3.
9
The 40 Anniversary of the .……的40周年纪念
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2023 Jun;41(2):105-107. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2208442. Epub 2023 May 11.
10
Continuity of care and mortality for patients with chronic disease: an observational study using Norwegian registry data.慢性病患者的连续护理与死亡率:一项使用挪威注册数据的观察性研究。
Fam Pract. 2023 Dec 22;40(5-6):698-706. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad025.
剑桥多种疾病评分的制定与验证。
CMAJ. 2020 Feb 3;192(5):E107-E114. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190757.
4
Coding algorithms for defining Charlson and Elixhauser co-morbidities in Read-coded databases.用于在 Read 编码数据库中定义 Charlson 和 Elixhauser 合并症的编码算法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 6;19(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0753-5.
5
Defining and measuring multimorbidity: a systematic review of systematic reviews.定义和测量多种疾病:系统综述的系统综述。
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Feb 1;29(1):182-189. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky098.
6
The Charlson Comorbidity Index in Registry-based Research.基于登记处研究的查尔森合并症指数
Methods Inf Med. 2017;56(5):401-406. doi: 10.3414/ME17-01-0051. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
7
The epidemiology of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study.初级保健中多种疾病的流行病学:一项回顾性队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Apr;68(669):e245-e251. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695465. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
8
The Best Use of the Charlson Comorbidity Index With Electronic Health Care Database to Predict Mortality.使用查尔森合并症指数结合电子医疗数据库预测死亡率的最佳方法。
Med Care. 2016 Feb;54(2):188-94. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000471.
9
A comparison of the recording of comorbidity in primary and secondary care by using the Charlson Index to predict short-term and long-term survival in a routine linked data cohort.在一个常规关联数据队列中,利用查尔森指数比较初级保健和二级保健中合并症的记录情况,以预测短期和长期生存率。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 5;5(6):e007974. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007974.
10
The Charlson comorbidity index can be used prospectively to identify patients who will incur high future costs.查尔森合并症指数可用于前瞻性地识别未来将产生高额费用的患者。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e112479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112479. eCollection 2014.