Suppr超能文献

临床比较二极管激光和 LED 激活牙齿漂白:9 个月随访。

Clinical comparison of diode laser- and LED-activated tooth bleaching: 9-month follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Sıhhıye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey.

Research and Application Center for Laser Applications in Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Oct;37(8):3237-3247. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03612-1. Epub 2022 Jul 12.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effect of diode laser- or LED-activated tooth bleaching on color change, tooth sensitivity(TS), temperature variation, and gingival irritation (GI) for 9 months. Thirty-five subjects having anterior teeth with a color of A2 or darker were enrolled in the study. In a split-mouth design, one side of each arch was activated by a diode laser (Epic X, Biolase), and the other side was activated by an LED (Radii Plus, SDI) in conjunction with a bleaching agent (35%, Whiteness HP). The color change was evaluated by subjective (VitaClassic/Vita3D Master Bleachguide) and objective (spectrophotometer, Vita Easyshade) methods for up to 9 months. TS and GI were assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) and gingival index, respectively, at the same recall periods. During the bleaching, the temperature variation was also recorded using a thermocouple. Statistical analyses were performed (p < 0.05). In the color evaluation, no statistically significant difference was found between diode laser and LED (p > 0.05), except for the 6-month spectrophotometric assessment (ΔE, ΔE), where higher values were obtained with the laser (p < 0.05). The temperature difference and maximum temperature with diode were found to be significantly higher than LED (p < 0.05). Higher values were obtained with LED when the mean temperatures were compared (p < 0.05). There was no difference between the two activation methods in terms of TS and GI at any of the recalls (p > 0.05). The bleaching activated either with diode laser or LED performed similar clinical performance in terms of effective color change, tooth sensitivity, and gingival irritation with minimum temperature variations.

摘要

本研究旨在评估二极管激光或 LED 激活牙齿漂白对颜色变化、牙齿敏感(TS)、温度变化和牙龈刺激(GI)的影响,为期 9 个月。35 名上前牙颜色为 A2 或更暗的受试者参与了这项研究。在分口设计中,每个弓的一侧用二极管激光(Epic X,Biolase)激活,另一侧用 LED(Radii Plus,SDI)与漂白剂(35%,Whiteness HP)联合激活。颜色变化通过主观(VitaClassic/Vita3D Master Bleachguide)和客观(分光光度计,Vita Easyshade)方法评估,最长可达 9 个月。在相同的召回期内,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)和牙龈指数分别评估 TS 和 GI。在漂白过程中,还使用热电偶记录温度变化。进行了统计分析(p < 0.05)。在颜色评估中,二极管激光和 LED 之间没有发现统计学上的显著差异(p > 0.05),除了 6 个月的分光光度评估(ΔE,ΔE),其中激光获得的数值更高(p < 0.05)。发现二极管的温差和最高温度明显高于 LED(p < 0.05)。当比较平均温度时,LED 获得的数值更高(p < 0.05)。在任何一次召回中,两种激活方法在 TS 和 GI 方面都没有差异(p > 0.05)。无论使用二极管激光还是 LED 激活漂白,在有效颜色变化、牙齿敏感和牙龈刺激方面的临床性能相似,温度变化最小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验