de Dombal F T, Softley A
Gut. 1987 Apr;28(4):474-81. doi: 10.1136/gut.28.4.474.
Observer variation in calculating various indices for estimating the severity and activity of Crohn's disease is reported. Seven prospective users of Crohn's disease activity indices were presented with 10 'cases histories' compiled from relevant patient data and asked to calculate (independently) various indices of severity and activity from this information. The results showed a disquieting degree of observer variation in all indices studied. Similar results were obtained when 15 members of the International Organisation for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IOIBD) reviewed one case history and also when members independently reviewed a series of real life cases. It is suggested that each index so far proposed is open to considerable observer variation, which casts some doubt upon the validity of studies so far carried out. Clarification of indices and the use of ranking methods can, however, do much to overcome this discrepancy.
据报道,在计算用于评估克罗恩病严重程度和活动度的各种指标时存在观察者差异。向七位克罗恩病活动指数的潜在使用者提供了根据相关患者数据汇编的10份“病例史”,并要求他们(独立地)根据这些信息计算各种严重程度和活动度指标。结果显示,在所研究的所有指标中,观察者差异程度令人不安。当国际炎症性肠病研究组织(IOIBD)的15名成员审查一份病例史时,以及当成员们独立审查一系列实际病例时,也得到了类似的结果。有人认为,迄今为止提出的每个指标都存在相当大的观察者差异,这对迄今为止所开展研究的有效性产生了一些怀疑。然而,明确指标并采用排序方法可以在很大程度上克服这种差异。