• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性腹腔镜手术与传统开放手术对老年膀胱癌患者手术结局、并发症及预后的影响

Effect of Radical Laparoscopic Surgery and Conventional Open Surgery on Surgical Outcomes, Complications, and Prognosis in Elderly Patients with Bladder Cancer.

作者信息

Chen Jiangang, Gu Zhibo, Pan Yongsheng, Zhang Yong, Gu Donghua

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China.

出版信息

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jul 4;2022:1681038. doi: 10.1155/2022/1681038. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/1681038
PMID:35832525
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9273384/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bladder cancer is a common malignant tumor of the urinary system in the clinic. It has multiple lesions, easy recurrence, easy metastasis, poor prognosis, and high mortality.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and open radical cystectomy (ORC) on the surgical outcome, complications, and prognosis of elderly patients with bladder cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred elderly bladder cancer patients who underwent surgery in our hospital from June 2019 to June 2021 were selected for the retrospective study and were divided into 50 cases each in the ORC group and the LRC group according to the different surgical methods. The ORC group was treated with ORC, and the LRC group implemented LRC treatment. The differences in surgery, immune function, recent clinical outcomes, and complications between the two groups were observed and compared.

RESULTS

The mean operative time, mean intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative and postoperative transfusion rate, and transfusion volume of patients in the LRC group were statistically significant when compared to the ORC group. The differences in the meantime to resume eating, time to get out of bed, mean number of days in hospital after surgery, and the amount of postoperative numbing analgesics used by patients in the LRC group after surgery were statistically significant compared to the ORC group ( < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the comparison of immune function between the two groups before surgery ( > 0.05), while the comparison of CD8 and B cells 1 week after surgery of the LRC group was significantly better than that of the ORC group ( < 0.05), and the operation time of the LRC group was longer than that of the ORC group ( < 0.05). Statistical analysis of postoperative complications showed that the overall incidence of postoperative complications in the LRC group was significantly lower than that in the ORC group (16.67% vs. 46.67%) ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

LRC has less surgical trauma and intraoperative bleeding, faster postoperative recovery, and fewer postoperative complications, providing some reference for clinical surgery for elderly bladder cancer patients.

摘要

背景

膀胱癌是临床上常见的泌尿系统恶性肿瘤。它具有多病灶、易复发、易转移、预后差及死亡率高的特点。

目的

本研究旨在探讨腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术(LRC)与开放性根治性膀胱切除术(ORC)对老年膀胱癌患者手术效果、并发症及预后的影响。

材料与方法

选取2019年6月至2021年6月在我院接受手术的100例老年膀胱癌患者进行回顾性研究,根据手术方式不同分为ORC组和LRC组,每组50例。ORC组采用ORC治疗,LRC组实施LRC治疗。观察并比较两组手术情况、免疫功能、近期临床疗效及并发症的差异。

结果

与ORC组相比,LRC组患者的平均手术时间、平均术中出血量、术中和术后输血率及输血量差异有统计学意义。LRC组患者术后恢复进食时间、下床时间、术后平均住院天数及术后使用麻醉性镇痛药的量与ORC组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术前免疫功能比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而LRC组术后1周CD8及B细胞的比较明显优于ORC组(P<0.05),且LRC组手术时间长于ORC组(P<0.05)。术后并发症统计分析显示,LRC组术后并发症总发生率明显低于ORC组(16.67%对46.67%)(P<0.05)。

结论

LRC手术创伤小、术中出血少、术后恢复快、术后并发症少,为老年膀胱癌患者的临床手术提供了一定参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/076e/9273384/bb75453d77a3/ECAM2022-1681038.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/076e/9273384/29eef8e4c781/ECAM2022-1681038.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/076e/9273384/8f9027f261a5/ECAM2022-1681038.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/076e/9273384/44b522b2cd24/ECAM2022-1681038.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/076e/9273384/bb75453d77a3/ECAM2022-1681038.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/076e/9273384/29eef8e4c781/ECAM2022-1681038.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/076e/9273384/8f9027f261a5/ECAM2022-1681038.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/076e/9273384/44b522b2cd24/ECAM2022-1681038.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/076e/9273384/bb75453d77a3/ECAM2022-1681038.004.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Radical Laparoscopic Surgery and Conventional Open Surgery on Surgical Outcomes, Complications, and Prognosis in Elderly Patients with Bladder Cancer.根治性腹腔镜手术与传统开放手术对老年膀胱癌患者手术结局、并发症及预后的影响
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jul 4;2022:1681038. doi: 10.1155/2022/1681038. eCollection 2022.
2
Evaluation of laparoscopic approach in radical cystectomy from implementation to consolidation: Internal validation.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术实施到巩固阶段的评估:内部验证。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2020 Mar;44(2):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
3
Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer over 75-year-old: a prospective randomized controlled trial.75岁以上膀胱癌患者腹腔镜与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 18;8(16):26565-26572. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15717.
4
Efficiency and Safety of Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer, and Postoperative Recurrence.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌的疗效和安全性,以及术后复发情况。
Arch Esp Urol. 2023 May;76(3):196-202. doi: 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20237603.23.
5
Can laparoscopic cystectomy become the method of choice in the treatment of invasive urothelial urinary bladder cancer?腹腔镜膀胱肿瘤切除术能否成为浸润性膀胱癌的治疗方法?
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020 Mar;29(3):301-306. doi: 10.17219/acem/115084.
6
Does previous abdominal surgery adversely affect perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic radical cystectomy?既往腹部手术是否会对腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的围手术期和肿瘤学结果产生不利影响?
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan 17;16(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1317-6.
7
A Single-centre Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL).一项关于开放性、机器人辅助及腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的单中心早期随机对照三臂试验(CORAL)
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):613-621. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.038. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
8
[Perioperative outcome of laparoscopic radical cystectomy: comparison to open radical cystectomy].[腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的围手术期结果:与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的比较]
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2010 Sep;101(6):721-5. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol.101.721.
9
[Open vs Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: Comparison of perioperative and Mid-term oncological outcomes.].[开放性与腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术:围手术期及中期肿瘤学结局的比较。]
Arch Esp Urol. 2020 Jan;73(1):32-40.
10
[Compare of laparoscopic and open surgery for radical cystectomy with orthotopic ileal neobladder].腹腔镜与开放手术行根治性膀胱切除术并原位回肠新膀胱术的比较
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Dec 15;46(24):1870-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Retracted: Effect of Radical Laparoscopic Surgery and Conventional Open Surgery on Surgical Outcomes, Complications, and Prognosis in Elderly Patients with Bladder Cancer.撤回:根治性腹腔镜手术与传统开放手术对老年膀胱癌患者手术结果、并发症及预后的影响
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2023 Jan 11;2023:9835627. doi: 10.1155/2023/9835627. eCollection 2023.
2
Effects of Nursing Care for the Treatment of Patients with Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.护理治疗膀胱癌患者的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Sep 25;2022:9554223. doi: 10.1155/2022/9554223. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Application of nanotechnology in the diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer.纳米技术在膀胱癌诊断和治疗中的应用。
J Nanobiotechnology. 2021 Nov 27;19(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-01104-y.
2
Does minimally invasive surgery for bladder cancer result in unusual sites of metastasis?膀胱癌的微创手术是否会导致转移部位异常?
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2021 Sep;45(7):512-519. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
3
Progressive perioperative benefits of laparoscopy in combination with an ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol in radical cystectomy with ileal conduit.
腹腔镜联合 ERAS(术后加速康复)方案在根治性膀胱切除加回肠导管术的围手术期的进展获益。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2021 May;45(4):289-299. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2020.10.008. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
4
Predictive nomograms for oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma applying the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer 8th edition staging system.应用美国癌症联合委员会/国际抗癌联盟第 8 版分期系统预测口腔舌鳞状细胞癌。
Head Neck. 2021 Apr;43(4):1043-1055. doi: 10.1002/hed.26554. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
5
Bayesian network analysis of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.基于贝叶斯网络的膀胱癌开放式、腹腔镜式和机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 24;99(52):e23645. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023645.
6
Urinary biomarkers in bladder cancer: A review of the current landscape and future directions.膀胱癌的尿生物标志物:当前研究现状及未来方向综述。
Urol Oncol. 2021 Jan;39(1):41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.08.016. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
7
Bladder preservation therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer: the past, present and future.膀胱癌的膀胱保留治疗:过去、现在和未来。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 28;50(10):1097-1107. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa155.
8
Evolution of Urothelial Bladder Cancer in the Context of Molecular Classifications.在分子分类学背景下的尿路上皮膀胱癌的演变。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Aug 7;21(16):5670. doi: 10.3390/ijms21165670.
9
Mechanisms of BCG in the treatment of bladder cancer-current understanding and the prospect.BCG 在膀胱癌治疗中的作用机制:当前认识与展望。
Biomed Pharmacother. 2020 Sep;129:110393. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110393. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
10
The Utility and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer at a Single Institution.单中心研究:腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌的疗效和实用性。
Urol Int. 2020;104(7-8):573-579. doi: 10.1159/000508192. Epub 2020 Jun 17.