Langer Álvaro I, Wardenaar Klaas, Wigman Johanna T W, Ulloa José Luis, Núñez Daniel
Mind-Body Lab, Institute of Psychological Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
Agencia Nacional de Investigaciòn y Desarrollo (ANID), Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Imhay, Santiago, Chile.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 27;13:926556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.926556. eCollection 2022.
Psychotic experiences (PEs) are prevalent in the general population, particularly in adolescents. PEs are associated with various negative outcomes such as psychotic, depressive, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorders and suicidal behavior. Recent studies in the general population have suggested that what makes PEs relevant is not so much the experiences , but their association with non-psychotic comorbidity and other transdiagnostic domains. Thus, there is a need for a better understanding of how PEs exist in a larger psychopathological context in adolescents. In the present study we aimed to explore this, using latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify different patterns in which PEs, psychiatric symptoms and psychological processes co-occur. LPA was conducted using data from an adolescent general population subsample ( = 335) with PEs. We conducted LPA, using measures of PEs, psychiatric symptoms and behaviors (depression, anxiety post-traumatic stress disorder and suicidal behavior) and cognitive and affective processes of entrapment/defeat and emotional regulation as manifest variables. We found that the best fit was obtained with a four-class solution that distinguished primarily between different levels of overall severity: "low symptomatology" (19.1%), "mild-moderate symptomatology" (39.4%), "moderate symptomatology" (33.7%); "high symptomatology" (7.8%). Levels of depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms and defeat/entrapment were most differentiated between classes. The high symptomatology group showed the highest scores in all psychiatric symptoms suicidal ideation, and emotional/cognitive domains, except in cognitive reappraisal. This group also showed the highest usage of emotional suppression. Our results suggest that the assessment of mental health risk in adolescents should be aware that PEs exist in a broad context of other domains of psychopathology and transdiagnostic cognitive and affective processes.
精神病性体验(PEs)在普通人群中普遍存在,尤其是在青少年中。PEs与各种负面结果相关,如精神病性障碍、抑郁障碍、焦虑障碍、创伤后应激障碍以及自杀行为。普通人群中的近期研究表明,使PEs具有相关性的与其说是这些体验本身,不如说是它们与非精神病性共病及其他跨诊断领域的关联。因此,有必要更好地理解PEs在青少年更广泛的精神病理背景中是如何存在的。在本研究中,我们旨在对此进行探索,使用潜在剖面分析(LPA)来识别PEs、精神症状和心理过程共同出现的不同模式。LPA使用了来自有PEs的青少年普通人群子样本(n = 335)的数据进行。我们进行LPA时,将PEs、精神症状和行为(抑郁、焦虑、创伤后应激障碍和自杀行为)以及陷入/挫败和情绪调节的认知与情感过程的测量作为显变量。我们发现,四类解决方案能得到最佳拟合,主要区分了不同程度的总体严重程度:“低症状学水平”(19.1%)、“轻度 - 中度症状学水平”(39.4%)、“中度症状学水平”(33.7%);“高症状学水平”(7.8%)。抑郁水平、创伤后应激症状以及挫败/陷入在不同类别之间差异最为明显。高症状学水平组在所有精神症状、自杀意念以及情绪/认知领域中得分最高,但认知重评除外。该组还表现出最高程度的情绪抑制使用情况。我们的结果表明,对青少年心理健康风险的评估应意识到PEs存在于精神病理学其他领域以及跨诊断认知与情感过程的广泛背景之中。