Gill Amarbir S, Biggs Philip C, Hagwood Garrett, Beliveau Angela M, Shahlaie Kiarash, Strong E B, Steele Toby O
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, United States.
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, United States.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 May 17;83(Suppl 2):e401-e409. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729979. eCollection 2022 Jun.
The internet presents a rich milieu of multimedia options relating to pituitary and endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS). Misinformation can create discordance between patient and provider expectations. The purpose of this study is to analyze the understandability and actionability of available ESBS and pituitary surgery audiovisual information on YouTube and Google. The top 50 videos generated by searching "pituitary surgery/transsphenoidal surgery" and "endoscopic skull base surgery" in both YouTube and Google were sorted by relevance. Two independent reviewers evaluated each for understandability and actionability based on the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for audiovisual material (PEMAT-A/V). Source, authorship, audience, and education/advertisement variables were collected. Chi-square test followed by univariate and multivariate regression analyses assessed the association between these variables and quality. A total of 85 videos (52 YouTube and 33 Google) met inclusion criteria for analysis. There was no significant difference in the presence of the aforementioned variables between YouTube and Google ( < 0.05). Also, 72% of videos targeted patients and 28% targeted surgeons. Academic institutions uploaded 58% of videos. Surgeon-targeted videos were more educational ( = 0.01) and patient-targeted videos involved more advertisement ( = 0.01). Understandability and actionability scores were below the 70% threshold for both YouTube (65 ± 15, 38 ± 33, = 0.65) and Google (66 ± 12, 38 ± 26, = 0.94). Patient-targeted videos ( = 0.002) were more understandable, while surgeon- ( < 0.001) and education-focused videos ( < 0.001) were more actionable. Understandability and actionability of YouTube and Google audiovisual patient information on ESBS and pituitary surgery is poor. Consideration should be given to the formation of a standardized patient information resource.
互联网提供了与垂体和内镜颅底手术(ESBS)相关的丰富多媒体选项。错误信息可能会导致患者和医疗服务提供者的期望出现不一致。本研究的目的是分析YouTube和谷歌上现有的ESBS和垂体手术视听信息的可理解性和可操作性。
在YouTube和谷歌上搜索“垂体手术/经蝶窦手术”和“内镜颅底手术”所产生的前50个视频按相关性进行排序。两名独立评审员根据视听材料患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT-A/V)对每个视频的可理解性和可操作性进行评估。收集来源、作者、受众以及教育/广告变量。采用卡方检验,随后进行单变量和多变量回归分析,以评估这些变量与质量之间的关联。
共有85个视频(52个来自YouTube,33个来自谷歌)符合分析的纳入标准。YouTube和谷歌之间上述变量的存在没有显著差异(P<0.05)。此外,72%的视频面向患者,28%的视频面向外科医生。学术机构上传了58%的视频。面向外科医生的视频更具教育性(P = 0.01),而面向患者的视频包含更多广告(P = 0.01)。YouTube(65±15,38±33,P = 0.65)和谷歌(66±12,38±26,P = 0.94)的可理解性和可操作性得分均低于70%的阈值。面向患者的视频(P = 0.002)更具可理解性,而面向外科医生的视频(P<0.001)和以教育为重点的视频(P<0.001)更具可操作性。
YouTube和谷歌上关于ESBS和垂体手术的视听患者信息的可理解性和可操作性较差。应考虑形成标准化的患者信息资源。