• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种门冬胰岛素制剂(来得时和诺和锐)联合二甲双胍治疗糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项多中心、随机、开放标签、对照临床试验。

Comparative efficacy and safety of two insulin aspart formulations (Rapilin and NovoRapid) when combined with metformin, for patients with diabetes mellitus: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.

Siping Central Hospital, Siping, China.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Nov;38(11):1797-1806. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2100652. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1080/03007995.2022.2100652
PMID:35833285
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This phase 3 confirmatory diabetes mellitus treatment study compared the safety and efficacy of Rapilin and NovoRapid insulin asparts in combination with metformin.

METHODS

This 24-week, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, noninferiority phase 3 confirmatory study conducted across centers in China aimed to enroll patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and blood sugar glucose inadequately controlled by oral antidiabetic drugs. Randomized patients received subcutaneous mealtime Rapilin or NovoRapid (3:1) injections, with metformin. The primary objectives were to demonstrate noninferiority (margin of 0.4%) in HbA1c change from baseline and compare safety profiles of Rapilin versus NovoRapid after 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included 2-h postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and patients achieving HbA1c <7.0% and ≤6.5%.

RESULTS

590 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized to Rapilin ( = 441) and NovoRapid ( = 149) groups. After 24 weeks, the mean HbA1c change from baseline was -2.20% (Rapilin) and -2.32% (NovoRapid); the estimated treatment difference based on least-square means was 0.04% (95% CI: -0.17, 0.26), meeting the noninferiority criteria for Rapilin versus NovoRapid. Comparable improvements were reported for mean 2-hour PPG (6.14 and 6.29 mmol/L), FPG (2.02 and 1.70 mmol/L), and patients with HbA1c <7.0% (52.6% and 51.0%) and ≤6.5% (34.2% and 30.9%), in the Rapilin and NovoRapid groups, respectively, with no significant safety or immunogenicity outcome differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapilin demonstrated non-inferior glycemic control, and matching safety and immunogenicity to NovoRapid in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus also receiving metformin over 24 weeks.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR20003129041.

摘要

目的

这项 3 期糖尿病治疗研究比较了瑞帕林与诺和锐门冬胰岛素联用二甲双胍的安全性和疗效。

方法

这是一项在中国多个中心进行的 24 周、开放标签、随机、活性对照、非劣效性 3 期确证研究,旨在招募血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者。随机分组患者接受皮下餐时瑞帕林或诺和锐(3:1)注射,联合二甲双胍。主要目标是证明 HbA1c 自基线的变化不劣于(0.4%的差值),并且在 24 周后比较瑞帕林与诺和锐的安全性。次要结局包括餐后 2 小时血糖(PPG)、空腹血糖(FPG)以及达到 HbA1c<7.0%和≤6.5%的患者比例。

结果

590 例 2 型糖尿病患者随机分配至瑞帕林(n=441)和诺和锐(n=149)组。24 周后,瑞帕林组和诺和锐组的 HbA1c 自基线的平均变化分别为-2.20%和-2.32%;基于最小二乘均数估计的治疗差异为 0.04%(95%CI:-0.17,0.26),满足瑞帕林与诺和锐相比的非劣效性标准。瑞帕林组和诺和锐组的平均 2 小时 PPG(6.14 和 6.29mmol/L)、FPG(2.02 和 1.70mmol/L)以及 HbA1c<7.0%(52.6%和 51.0%)和≤6.5%(34.2%和 30.9%)的患者比例也有类似的改善,两组间安全性或免疫原性无显著差异。

结论

在接受二甲双胍治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者中,瑞帕林在 24 周时显示出与诺和锐相当的血糖控制效果,且安全性和免疫原性相当。

试验注册

ChiCTR20003129041。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of two insulin aspart formulations (Rapilin and NovoRapid) when combined with metformin, for patients with diabetes mellitus: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial.两种门冬胰岛素制剂(来得时和诺和锐)联合二甲双胍治疗糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项多中心、随机、开放标签、对照临床试验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Nov;38(11):1797-1806. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2100652. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
2
[Comparison of efficacy and safety of insulin aspart injection Rishulin and NovoRapid for treatment of diabetes: a multicenter, randomized, open-labeled, controlled trial].
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Dec 1;60(12):1148-1156. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20210127-00075.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Aspart Biosimilar SAR341402 Versus Originator Insulin Aspart in People with Diabetes Treated for 26 Weeks with Multiple Daily Injections in Combination with Insulin Glargine: A Randomized Open-Label Trial (GEMELLI 1).在接受甘精胰岛素联合多次皮下注射治疗 26 周的糖尿病患者中,比较人胰岛素类似物 SAR341402 与原研药门冬胰岛素的疗效和安全性:一项随机、开放标签试验(GEMELLI 1)。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Feb;22(2):85-95. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0382.
4
Efficacy and safety of generic exenatide injection in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial.中文名称为“在中国 2 型糖尿病患者中,通用艾塞那肽注射液的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、对照、非劣效性试验”。
Acta Diabetol. 2020 Aug;57(8):991-1000. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01510-y. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
5
A Randomized Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Compared With Insulin Aspart, Both in Combination With Insulin Degludec With or Without Metformin, in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (ONSET 9).一项评估速效门冬胰岛素与门冬胰岛素联合或不联合二甲双胍与地特胰岛素治疗成人 2 型糖尿病的疗效和安全性的随机试验(ONSET 9)。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Aug;43(8):1710-1716. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2232. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
6
Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes: A phase III, open-label, 2:1 randomized, treat-to-target trial.中文 2 型糖尿病患者中德谷胰岛素/门冬胰岛素与精蛋白锌重组赖脯胰岛素 30 疗效和安全性的比较:一项 III 期、开放标签、2:1 随机、目标导向治疗的试验。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jul;21(7):1652-1660. doi: 10.1111/dom.13703. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
7
Immunogenicity, Efficacy, and Safety of Biosimilar Insulin Aspart (MYL-1601D) Compared with Originator Insulin Aspart (Novolog) in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes After 24 Weeks: A Randomized Open-Label Study.在 24 周后,与原研药门冬胰岛素(诺和锐)相比,生物类似药门冬胰岛素(迈兰-1601D)在 1 型糖尿病患者中的免疫原性、疗效和安全性:一项随机、开放标签研究。
BioDrugs. 2022 Nov;36(6):761-772. doi: 10.1007/s40259-022-00554-6. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
8
Faster Aspart Versus Insulin Aspart as Part of a Basal-Bolus Regimen in Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: The onset 2 Trial.预混胰岛素类似物转换治疗对控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效:ONSET 2 研究。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jul;40(7):951-957. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1770. Epub 2017 May 8.
9
Comparison of biphasic insulin aspart 30 given three times daily or twice daily in combination with metformin versus oral antidiabetic drugs alone in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: a 16-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial conducted in russia.在俄罗斯进行的一项为期16周的随机、开放标签、平行组试验:比较每日三次或每日两次给予门冬胰岛素30联合二甲双胍与单用口服抗糖尿病药物治疗2型糖尿病控制不佳患者的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2374-84. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.017.
10
Comparative assessment of immunogenicity of recombinant insulin Aspart from BioGenomics and its originator NovoRapid® in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.比较研究生物基因组公司的重组门冬胰岛素与诺和诺德公司诺和锐®在 2 型糖尿病成年患者中的免疫原性。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2024 Jun;47(6):1435-1446. doi: 10.1007/s40618-023-02263-5. Epub 2023 Dec 26.