Suppr超能文献

两种门冬胰岛素制剂(来得时和诺和锐)联合二甲双胍治疗糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项多中心、随机、开放标签、对照临床试验。

Comparative efficacy and safety of two insulin aspart formulations (Rapilin and NovoRapid) when combined with metformin, for patients with diabetes mellitus: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.

Siping Central Hospital, Siping, China.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Nov;38(11):1797-1806. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2100652. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This phase 3 confirmatory diabetes mellitus treatment study compared the safety and efficacy of Rapilin and NovoRapid insulin asparts in combination with metformin.

METHODS

This 24-week, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, noninferiority phase 3 confirmatory study conducted across centers in China aimed to enroll patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and blood sugar glucose inadequately controlled by oral antidiabetic drugs. Randomized patients received subcutaneous mealtime Rapilin or NovoRapid (3:1) injections, with metformin. The primary objectives were to demonstrate noninferiority (margin of 0.4%) in HbA1c change from baseline and compare safety profiles of Rapilin versus NovoRapid after 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included 2-h postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and patients achieving HbA1c <7.0% and ≤6.5%.

RESULTS

590 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized to Rapilin ( = 441) and NovoRapid ( = 149) groups. After 24 weeks, the mean HbA1c change from baseline was -2.20% (Rapilin) and -2.32% (NovoRapid); the estimated treatment difference based on least-square means was 0.04% (95% CI: -0.17, 0.26), meeting the noninferiority criteria for Rapilin versus NovoRapid. Comparable improvements were reported for mean 2-hour PPG (6.14 and 6.29 mmol/L), FPG (2.02 and 1.70 mmol/L), and patients with HbA1c <7.0% (52.6% and 51.0%) and ≤6.5% (34.2% and 30.9%), in the Rapilin and NovoRapid groups, respectively, with no significant safety or immunogenicity outcome differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapilin demonstrated non-inferior glycemic control, and matching safety and immunogenicity to NovoRapid in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus also receiving metformin over 24 weeks.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR20003129041.

摘要

目的

这项 3 期糖尿病治疗研究比较了瑞帕林与诺和锐门冬胰岛素联用二甲双胍的安全性和疗效。

方法

这是一项在中国多个中心进行的 24 周、开放标签、随机、活性对照、非劣效性 3 期确证研究,旨在招募血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者。随机分组患者接受皮下餐时瑞帕林或诺和锐(3:1)注射,联合二甲双胍。主要目标是证明 HbA1c 自基线的变化不劣于(0.4%的差值),并且在 24 周后比较瑞帕林与诺和锐的安全性。次要结局包括餐后 2 小时血糖(PPG)、空腹血糖(FPG)以及达到 HbA1c<7.0%和≤6.5%的患者比例。

结果

590 例 2 型糖尿病患者随机分配至瑞帕林(n=441)和诺和锐(n=149)组。24 周后,瑞帕林组和诺和锐组的 HbA1c 自基线的平均变化分别为-2.20%和-2.32%;基于最小二乘均数估计的治疗差异为 0.04%(95%CI:-0.17,0.26),满足瑞帕林与诺和锐相比的非劣效性标准。瑞帕林组和诺和锐组的平均 2 小时 PPG(6.14 和 6.29mmol/L)、FPG(2.02 和 1.70mmol/L)以及 HbA1c<7.0%(52.6%和 51.0%)和≤6.5%(34.2%和 30.9%)的患者比例也有类似的改善,两组间安全性或免疫原性无显著差异。

结论

在接受二甲双胍治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者中,瑞帕林在 24 周时显示出与诺和锐相当的血糖控制效果,且安全性和免疫原性相当。

试验注册

ChiCTR20003129041。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验