Ndjitoyap C, Lerebours E, Weber J, Galmiche J P, Denis P
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1987;7(2):89-93.
To assess lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) response to anticholinergic drugs, six healthy subjects were repeatedly studied according to two experimental procedures. In Method A, water-filled catheters were infused by a classical syringe pump and the recording assembly permitted only one orifice to be stationed within the LOS. The study was not conducted in a double-blind fashion. Method B was a double-blind study, in which water-filled catheters were infused by a hydraulic infusion system and the recording assembly permitted two or three orifices to be stationed within the LOS. The results showed that: Whatever the method used, LOS responses to pentagastrin (0.1, 0.3, 0.6, 1.2 micrograms/kg) were not significantly different under control experiments. With Method A, atropine infusion markedly reduced LOS responses to pentagastrin. With Method B, atropine infusion did not modify LOS responses to pentagastrin. These results raise the possibility that technical factors could account for conflicting reports of the effect of atropine on the pentagastrin-stimulated lower oesophageal sphincter.
为评估食管下括约肌(LOS)对抗胆碱能药物的反应,按照两种实验程序对6名健康受试者进行了重复研究。在方法A中,用传统的注射泵向充水导管中注入液体,记录装置只允许一个小孔位于食管下括约肌内。该研究并非采用双盲方式进行。方法B是一项双盲研究,其中用液压输注系统向充水导管中注入液体,记录装置允许两个或三个小孔位于食管下括约肌内。结果显示:无论采用何种方法,在对照实验中,食管下括约肌对五肽胃泌素(0.1、0.3、0.6、1.2微克/千克)的反应均无显著差异。采用方法A时,注入阿托品可显著降低食管下括约肌对五肽胃泌素的反应。采用方法B时,注入阿托品并未改变食管下括约肌对五肽胃泌素的反应。这些结果提示,技术因素可能是导致关于阿托品对五肽胃泌素刺激的食管下括约肌作用的报道相互矛盾的原因。