Suppr超能文献

使用边缘型人格障碍严重程度-IV 指数反馈来调整边缘型人格障碍治疗:治疗师和患者的观点。

The use of borderline personality disorder severity index-iv feedback in adjusting borderline personality disorder treatment: therapists and patients perspectives.

机构信息

De Viersprong, Netherlands Institute of Personality Disorders, PO Box 7, 4660 AA, Halsteren, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 15933, 1001NK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 14;22(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04104-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous research has emphasized the importance of therapists giving Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) feedback to their patients. It has been shown that several factors influence therapists' tendency to provide ROM feedback to their patients.

METHODS

In this qualitative study, using a semi-structured interview followed by thematic analysis using Atlas.ti, we focused on experiences of therapists and patients with a disorder specific ROM instrument: the Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index-IV (BPDSI-IV). Ten patients with a borderline personality disorder who had been in Mentalization Based Treatment (MBT) and ten MBT-therapists treating patients with a borderline personality disorder were interviewed.

RESULTS

Qualitative analysis revealed that patients experienced benefits of ROM using the BPDSI-IV. Patients gained more insight in and recognition of their borderline personality disorder symptoms. They also felt more understood by the therapist because they got an opportunity to explain their symptoms in a different way than in a regular therapy session. Therapists shared they didn't always use all the ROM outcomes as serious feedback for adjusting treatment. They preferred to use the BPDSI-IV over the other ROM instruments, because the BPDSI-IV is disorder specific, which gives insight into the treatment course of the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Experiences of both patients and therapists with the BPDSI-IV were positive. It seems to be valuable and promising for healthcare institutions to evaluate treatment with a disorder specific ROM instrument.

摘要

背景

之前的研究强调了治疗师向患者提供常规结果监测 (ROM) 反馈的重要性。已经表明,有几个因素会影响治疗师向患者提供 ROM 反馈的倾向。

方法

在这项定性研究中,我们使用半结构化访谈,然后使用 Atlas.ti 进行主题分析,重点关注具有特定障碍的 ROM 工具(即边缘型人格障碍严重程度指数-IV [BPDSI-IV])的治疗师和患者的经验。我们采访了 10 名接受心理化治疗 (MBT) 的边缘型人格障碍患者和 10 名治疗边缘型人格障碍患者的 MBT 治疗师。

结果

定性分析表明,患者使用 BPDSI-IV 获得了 ROM 的益处。患者对自己的边缘型人格障碍症状有了更多的了解和认识。他们也感到治疗师更能理解他们,因为他们有机会以不同于常规治疗的方式解释自己的症状。治疗师们表示,他们并不总是将所有 ROM 结果作为调整治疗的严重反馈。他们更喜欢使用 BPDSI-IV 而不是其他 ROM 工具,因为 BPDSI-IV 是针对特定障碍的,这可以深入了解患者的治疗过程。

结论

患者和治疗师对 BPDSI-IV 的体验都是积极的。对于医疗机构来说,使用特定障碍的 ROM 工具来评估治疗似乎是有价值和有前途的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2930/9284892/d05cd5394d50/12888_2022_4104_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验