• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

嵌体软骨蝶形法与颞筋膜下法鼓室成形术的比较

Comparison of Inlay Cartilage Butterfly and Underlay Temporal Fascia Tympanoplasty.

作者信息

Lubianca Neto José Faibes, Koerig Schuster Artur, Neves Lubianca João Pedro, Eavey Roland Douglas

机构信息

Medical School of Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Graduate Program in Pediatrics of Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

出版信息

OTO Open. 2022 Jul 8;6(3):2473974X221108935. doi: 10.1177/2473974X221108935. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.

DOI:10.1177/2473974X221108935
PMID:35836497
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9274429/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the results of inlay cartilage butterfly tympanoplasty and standard underlay temporal fascia tympanoplasty for anatomic and functional end points.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Virtual Health Library (VHL/Lilacs) databases were searched from inception through April 2, 2021. No restrictions on language, publication year, or publication status were applied.

REVIEW METHODS

The meta-analysis included data from articles that met inclusion criteria and were extracted by 2 authors independently. The PRISMA statement was followed. Risk of Bias 2.0 and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess risk of bias. The primary outcome was tympanic membrane closure rate. The secondary outcome was improvement of the air-bone gap.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included, 9 cohort studies and 1 randomized clinical trial, with 577 patients. The graft take rate was 82.8% in the butterfly cartilage inlay tympanoplasty group and 85.2% in the temporal fascia underlay tympanoplasty group (relative risk, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93-1.11; = 42%, = .08). The air-bone gap reduction ranged from 6.1 to 11.28 in the butterfly cartilage inlay group and from 5.2 to 12.66 in the temporal fascia underlay group, with a mean difference between groups of -2.08 (95% CI, -3.23 to -0.94; = 58%, = .04), favoring temporal fascia underlay.

CONCLUSION

The 2 tympanoplasty techniques analyzed here produced similar results in terms of successful reconstruction of the tympanic membrane and reduction in the air-bone gap. Neither age nor follow-up length of time influenced outcomes.

摘要

目的

系统评价嵌体软骨蝴蝶鼓膜成形术和标准的颞肌筋膜内置法鼓膜成形术在解剖学和功能终点方面的结果。

数据来源

检索了PubMed、Embase、MEDLINE和虚拟健康图书馆(VHL/Lilacs)数据库,检索时间从建库至2021年4月2日。对语言、出版年份或出版状态没有限制。

综述方法

荟萃分析纳入了符合纳入标准的文章数据,并由2位作者独立提取。遵循PRISMA声明。使用偏倚风险2.0和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。主要结局是鼓膜封闭率。次要结局是气骨导差的改善情况。

结果

纳入10项研究,9项队列研究和1项随机临床试验,共577例患者。蝴蝶软骨嵌体鼓膜成形术组的移植物成活率为82.8%,颞肌筋膜内置法鼓膜成形术组为85.2%(相对危险度,1.01;95%可信区间,0.93-1.11;I² = 42%,P = 0.08)。蝴蝶软骨嵌体组的气骨导差缩小范围为6.1至11.28,颞肌筋膜内置法组为5.2至12.66,两组间平均差值为-2.08(95%可信区间,-3.23至-0.94;I² = 58%,P = 0.04),支持颞肌筋膜内置法。

结论

本文分析的两种鼓膜成形术在鼓膜成功重建和气骨导差缩小方面产生了相似的结果。年龄和随访时间长短均未影响结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8913/9274429/0857a528445f/10.1177_2473974X221108935-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8913/9274429/07c8784f46ca/10.1177_2473974X221108935-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8913/9274429/c860abf47649/10.1177_2473974X221108935-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8913/9274429/0857a528445f/10.1177_2473974X221108935-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8913/9274429/07c8784f46ca/10.1177_2473974X221108935-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8913/9274429/c860abf47649/10.1177_2473974X221108935-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8913/9274429/0857a528445f/10.1177_2473974X221108935-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Inlay Cartilage Butterfly and Underlay Temporal Fascia Tympanoplasty.嵌体软骨蝶形法与颞筋膜下法鼓室成形术的比较
OTO Open. 2022 Jul 8;6(3):2473974X221108935. doi: 10.1177/2473974X221108935. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
2
Inlay Butterfly Cartilage Tympanoplasty: Anatomic and Functional Results.内嵌式蝶形软骨鼓室成形术:解剖学及功能学结果
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jun;70(2):235-239. doi: 10.1007/s12070-017-1097-2. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
3
Comparison between endoscopic and microscopic butterfly cartilage graft inlay tympanoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜下与显微镜下蝶形软骨移植内嵌式鼓室成形术的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jan;280(1):151-158. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07477-6. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
4
Comparison of clinical outcomes between butterfly inlay cartilage tympanoplasty and conventional underlay cartilage tympanoplasty.蝶形镶嵌软骨鼓膜成形术与传统衬里软骨鼓膜成形术临床疗效比较
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2019 Apr;46(2):167-171. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
5
Functional and practical outcomes of inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty.内嵌式蝶形软骨鼓室成形术的功能及实际效果
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Sep;35(8):1458-62. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000419.
6
Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty in children.儿童内嵌式蝶形软骨鼓室成形术
Otol Neurotol. 2005 Mar;26(2):247-51. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200503000-00020.
7
Evaluation of inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty: a randomized clinical trial.嵌体式蝶形软骨鼓膜成形术的评估:一项随机临床试验。
Laryngoscope. 2001 Aug;111(8):1479-85. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200108000-00027.
8
Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty in the treatment of dry central perforated chronic otitis media as an effective and time-saving procedure.内嵌式蝶形软骨鼓室成形术治疗干性中央型穿孔慢性中耳炎是一种有效且省时的手术方法。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Apr;272(4):867-872. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-2889-6. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
9
Inlay triple- "C" tympanoplasty: a comparative study for its use in large, marginal perforations.嵌体式"C"型鼓室成形术:用于大而边缘性穿孔的对比研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Oct;278(10):3715-3722. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06439-0. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
10
Comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with double layer graft (modified sandwich fascia) technique and single layer graft (underlay fascia and underlay cartilage) technique.采用双层移植物(改良三明治筋膜)技术和单层移植物(衬里筋膜和衬里软骨)技术进行鼓室成形术的临床和听力学结果比较。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018 Jun;45(3):440-446. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation on the possibility of sound conduction independent of tympanic air cavity for severe tympanic adhesion patients by finite element analysis.通过有限元分析评估重度鼓膜粘连患者鼓膜气腔独立传音的可能性。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Oct 31;11:1212303. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1212303. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
2
A Systematic Review of Nonautologous Graft Materials Used in Human Tympanoplasty.用于人类鼓室成形术的非自体移植物材料的系统评价。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Feb;131(2):392-400. doi: 10.1002/lary.28914. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
3
A comparison of endoscopic and microscopic inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasties and their educational utility.内镜与显微镜下蝶骨软骨嵌入式鼓室成形术的比较及其教学实用性。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 30;15(10):e0241152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241152. eCollection 2020.
4
Pediatric type 1 tympanoplasty - Does age matter?小儿 1 型鼓室成形术-年龄重要吗?
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Oct;137:110219. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110219. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
5
Comparative Analysis of Fascia Lata and Cartilage Graft in Revision Type 1 Tympanoplasty.1型翻修鼓室成形术中阔筋膜与软骨移植的对比分析
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Nov;71(Suppl 2):1232-1237. doi: 10.1007/s12070-018-1286-7. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
6
Evaluating butterfly inlay tympanoplasty.评估蝶形嵌体鼓室成形术。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Dec;127:109684. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109684. Epub 2019 Sep 15.
7
Determinants influencing success rates of myringoplasty in daily practice: a retrospective analysis.影响耳鼓膜成形术成功率的因素:回顾性分析。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Nov;276(11):3081-3087. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05611-5. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
8
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
9
Comparison of clinical outcomes between butterfly inlay cartilage tympanoplasty and conventional underlay cartilage tympanoplasty.蝶形镶嵌软骨鼓膜成形术与传统衬里软骨鼓膜成形术临床疗效比较
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2019 Apr;46(2):167-171. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
10
Inlay Butterfly Cartilage Tympanoplasty: Anatomic and Functional Results.内嵌式蝶形软骨鼓室成形术:解剖学及功能学结果
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jun;70(2):235-239. doi: 10.1007/s12070-017-1097-2. Epub 2017 Feb 14.