• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种评估煤矿井下避难场所热环境的测试方法。

A test method for evaluating the thermal environment of underground coal mine refuge alternatives.

作者信息

Yantek D S, Yan L, Damiano N W, Reyes M A, Srednicki J R

机构信息

CDC NIOSH, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA.

出版信息

Int J Min Sci Technol. 2019 May;29(3):343-355. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2019.01.004.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmst.2019.01.004
PMID:35836709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9278555/
Abstract

Since 2009, the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) has required mines to install refuge alternatives (RAs) in underground coal mines. One of the biggest concerns with occupied RAs is the possible severity of the resulting thermal environment. In 30 CFR 7.504, the maximum allowable apparent temperature (AT) for an occupied RA is specified as 35 °C (95 °F). Manufacturers must conduct heat/humidity tests to demonstrate that their RAs meet the 35 °C (95 °F) AT limit. For these tests, heat input devices are used to input the metabolic heat of actual miners. A wide variety of test methods, sensors, and heat input devices could be used when conducting such tests. Since 2012, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has conducted over thirty 96-hour heat/humidity tests on four different RAs. This paper discusses the test equipment and procedures used during these investigations. This information is useful for RA manufacturers conducting RA heat/humidity tests, for other researchers investigating RA heat/humidity buildup, and for those who need to assess the thermal environment of any confined space where people may be trapped or are seeking refuge.

摘要

自2009年以来,美国矿山安全与健康管理局(MSHA)要求煤矿在地下煤矿安装避难场所(RA)。有人占用的避难场所最大的担忧之一是由此产生的热环境可能的严峻程度。在30 CFR 7.504中,有人占用的避难场所的最高允许表观温度(AT)规定为35°C(95°F)。制造商必须进行热/湿度测试,以证明其避难场所符合35°C(95°F)的表观温度限制。对于这些测试,使用热输入设备来输入实际矿工的代谢热。进行此类测试时,可以使用多种测试方法、传感器和热输入设备。自2012年以来,美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)已对四种不同的避难场所进行了三十多次96小时的热/湿度测试。本文讨论了这些调查中使用的测试设备和程序。这些信息对于进行避难场所热/湿度测试的制造商、研究避难场所热/湿度积聚情况的其他研究人员以及那些需要评估人们可能被困或寻求避难的任何密闭空间的热环境的人员都很有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/8bfe06f634aa/nihms-1789890-f0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/5d161215a2aa/nihms-1789890-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/534212b96758/nihms-1789890-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/308091baac2b/nihms-1789890-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/837e61dd07ba/nihms-1789890-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/14faf0457b08/nihms-1789890-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/117bc4ca834e/nihms-1789890-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/aa1347120a77/nihms-1789890-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/94adb66aa5b5/nihms-1789890-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/8bfe06f634aa/nihms-1789890-f0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/5d161215a2aa/nihms-1789890-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/534212b96758/nihms-1789890-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/308091baac2b/nihms-1789890-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/837e61dd07ba/nihms-1789890-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/14faf0457b08/nihms-1789890-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/117bc4ca834e/nihms-1789890-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/aa1347120a77/nihms-1789890-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/94adb66aa5b5/nihms-1789890-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bff/9278555/8bfe06f634aa/nihms-1789890-f0009.jpg

相似文献

1
A test method for evaluating the thermal environment of underground coal mine refuge alternatives.一种评估煤矿井下避难场所热环境的测试方法。
Int J Min Sci Technol. 2019 May;29(3):343-355. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2019.01.004.
2
Validation of temperature and humidity thermal model of 23-person tent-type refuge alternative.23人帐篷式避难所替代方案的温度和湿度热模型验证
Min Eng. 2016 Sep;68(9):97. doi: 10.19150/me.6759.
3
Temperature Rise Within a Mobile Refuge Alternative-Experimental Investigation and Model Validation.移动避难所内的温度上升——实验研究与模型验证
J Therm Sci Eng Appl. 2017 Jun;9(2). doi: 10.1115/1.4034963. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
4
Underground Mine Refuge Alternatives Heat Mitigation.地下矿井避难场所的热缓解替代方案。
J Therm Sci Eng Appl. 2020 Apr;12(2). doi: 10.1115/1.4044345. Epub 2019 Sep 7.
5
Portable refuge alternatives temperature and humidity tests.便携式避难所替代品温度和湿度测试。
Min Eng. 2018 Oct;70(10):43-49. doi: 10.19150/me.8546.
6
Prediction of human core temperature rise and moisture loss in refuge alternatives for underground coal mines.地下煤矿避难场所人体核心温度上升及水分流失的预测
Trans Soc Min Metall Explor Inc. 2017 Jan;342:29-35. doi: 10.19150/trans.8105.
7
Effects of mine strata thermal behavior and mine initial temperatures on mobile refuge alternative temperature.矿层热行为和矿井初始温度对移动避难硐室温度的影响。
Min Eng. 2017 Apr;69(4):41-48. doi: 10.19150/me.7393.
8
Analysis of heat loss mechanisms for mobile tent-type refuge alternatives.移动帐篷式避难所替代方案的热损失机制分析。
Trans Soc Min Metall Explor Inc. 2016;340(1):70-74. doi: 10.19150/trans.7329.
9
Estimation of metabolic heat input for refuge alternative thermal testing and simulation.用于避难所替代热测试和模拟的代谢热输入估算。
Min Eng. 2018 Aug;70(8):50-54. doi: 10.19150/me.8429.
10
Cryogenic Air Supply Feasibility for a Confined Space: Underground Refuge Alternative Case Study.受限空间的低温空气供应可行性:地下避难所替代方案案例研究
ASME J Heat Mass Transf. 2024 Mar;146(3). doi: 10.1115/1.4064062.

引用本文的文献

1
Innovative Technologies to Improve Occupational Safety in Mining and Construction Industries-Part I.改善采矿和建筑行业职业安全的创新技术——第一部分。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 21;25(16):5201. doi: 10.3390/s25165201.
2
Cryogenic Air Supply Feasibility for a Confined Space: Underground Refuge Alternative Case Study.受限空间的低温空气供应可行性:地下避难所替代方案案例研究
ASME J Heat Mass Transf. 2024 Mar;146(3). doi: 10.1115/1.4064062.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of mine strata thermal behavior and mine initial temperatures on mobile refuge alternative temperature.矿层热行为和矿井初始温度对移动避难硐室温度的影响。
Min Eng. 2017 Apr;69(4):41-48. doi: 10.19150/me.7393.
2
Analysis of heat loss mechanisms for mobile tent-type refuge alternatives.移动帐篷式避难所替代方案的热损失机制分析。
Trans Soc Min Metall Explor Inc. 2016;340(1):70-74. doi: 10.19150/trans.7329.
3
Temperature Rise Within a Mobile Refuge Alternative-Experimental Investigation and Model Validation.移动避难所内的温度上升——实验研究与模型验证
J Therm Sci Eng Appl. 2017 Jun;9(2). doi: 10.1115/1.4034963. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
4
Validation of temperature and humidity thermal model of 23-person tent-type refuge alternative.23人帐篷式避难所替代方案的温度和湿度热模型验证
Min Eng. 2016 Sep;68(9):97. doi: 10.19150/me.6759.