Gomoll Andreas H, Mandelbaum Bert R, Farr Jack, Archambault W Tad, Sherman Seth L, Tabet Samuel K, Kimmerling Kelly A, Mowry Katie C
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
Cedars-Sinai Kerlan-Jobe Institute, Santa Monica, California.
Arthroscopy. 2023 Jan;39(1):66-78. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.06.036. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
The purpose of this crossover study was to determine the efficacy of amniotic suspension allograft (ASA) for moderate symptomatic knee osteoarthritis following failed treatment with hyaluronic acid (HA) or saline through 12 months' postcrossover injection using patient-reported and safety outcomes.
In this multicenter study, 95 patients from a 200-patient single-blind randomized controlled trial were eligible to crossover and receive a single injection of ASA 3 months after failed treatment with HA or saline. Patient-reported outcomes, including Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and visual analog scale (VAS), were collected out to 12 months postcrossover to determine pain and function. Radiographs and blood were collected for assessment of changes. Statistical analyses were performed using mixed effects model for repeated measures.
Treatment with ASA following failed treatment with HA or saline resulted in significant improvements in KOOS and VAS scores compared with crossover baseline. There were no differences in radiographic measures or anti-human leukocyte antigen serum levels compared with baseline and no severe adverse events reported. In addition, more than 55% of patients were responders at months 3, 6, and 12 as measured by the Outcome Measures in Arthritis Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International simplified responder criteria. There were no significant differences between the original ASA randomized group and crossover cohorts at any of the time points evaluated, suggesting that prior failed treatment with HA or saline did not significantly impact outcomes following treatment with ASA.
This study showed that patients who previously failed treatment with HA or saline had statistically significant improvements in pain and function scores following a crossover injection of ASA that was sustained for 12 months, as measured by KOOS and VAS. There were no serious adverse events reported, and the injection was safe.
II, prospective cohort study.
本交叉研究旨在通过患者报告的结果和安全性指标,确定在透明质酸(HA)或生理盐水治疗失败后,羊膜悬浮同种异体移植(ASA)对中度症状性膝骨关节炎的疗效,随访至交叉注射后12个月。
在这项多中心研究中,来自一项200例患者的单盲随机对照试验的95例患者符合交叉条件,在HA或生理盐水治疗失败3个月后接受单次ASA注射。收集患者报告的结果,包括膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS),直至交叉后12个月,以确定疼痛和功能情况。采集X线片和血液样本以评估变化。采用重复测量的混合效应模型进行统计分析。
与交叉基线相比,HA或生理盐水治疗失败后接受ASA治疗可使KOOS和VAS评分显著改善。与基线相比,X线测量指标或抗人白细胞抗原血清水平无差异,且未报告严重不良事件。此外,根据骨关节炎临床试验-国际骨关节炎研究学会简化反应标准测量,超过55%的患者在第3、6和12个月为反应者。在任何评估时间点,原ASA随机分组组和交叉队列之间均无显著差异,这表明先前HA或生理盐水治疗失败对ASA治疗后的结果无显著影响。
本研究表明,先前HA或生理盐水治疗失败的患者,交叉注射ASA后,通过KOOS和VAS测量,疼痛和功能评分在统计学上有显著改善,且持续12个月。未报告严重不良事件,注射安全。
II,前瞻性队列研究。