Bernard A A, Brooks S
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987 May;69(3):352-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.69B3.3584183.
Fifty-nine cases of trochanteric wire revision following hip arthroplasty with trochanteric osteotomy and reattachment were identified and their outcome was studied. Two were infected and were excluded. Five were revised for instability: four became stable while one continued to have persistent dislocation. Fifty-two were revised for pain, 36 by removal of the trochanteric wire and 16 by reattachment of the greater trochanter. Successful relief of pain was obtained in less than half the cases. There was no difference in the incidence of back pain, wiring technique, trochanteric advancement, previous surgery to the same hip, trochanteric size or the pattern of wire breakage in the successfully treated group and the unsuccessful group. Neither was the removal of intact wire from a united trochanter any more certain of relieving pain than removal of broken wire from an un-united trochanter. Six patients later required revision for loosening or infection. These results indicate the need for full radiological and haematological investigation before exploration of the greater trochanter. At exploration for pain the wires should simply be removed as we could show no successful union after late reattachment of the trochanter in the absence of instability.
我们确定了59例在进行转子截骨术和重新附着的髋关节置换术后进行转子钢丝翻修的病例,并对其结果进行了研究。其中2例感染,予以排除。5例因不稳定进行翻修:4例变得稳定,而1例仍持续脱位。52例因疼痛进行翻修,36例通过取出转子钢丝,16例通过重新附着大转子。不到一半的病例成功缓解了疼痛。在成功治疗组和未成功治疗组中,背痛发生率、钢丝固定技术、转子推进情况、同侧先前手术情况、转子大小或钢丝断裂模式均无差异。从愈合的转子上取出完整的钢丝并不比从未愈合的转子上取出断裂的钢丝更能确定缓解疼痛。6例患者后来因松动或感染需要再次翻修。这些结果表明,在探查大转子之前需要进行全面的放射学和血液学检查。在探查疼痛原因时,应简单地取出钢丝,因为在不存在不稳定的情况下,我们发现转子后期重新附着后没有成功愈合。