Suppr超能文献

使用可扩展评估工具的设备相关中断频率。

Frequency of Device-Related Interruptions Using a Scalable Assessment Tool.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2022 Oct;48(10):534-538. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.06.006. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical devices are implicated in approximately 15% of intraoperative interruptions and 25% of errors. Device-related interruptions (DRIs) are therefore an important target for surgical quality improvement, but scalable measurement methodologies are lacking. The researchers therefore developed, pilot tested, and refined a simple tool for assessing intraoperative DRIs.

METHODS

Five DRI categories achieved face validity with frontline providers and surgical safety experts: improper/challenging assembly, device failure, loss of sterility, disconnection, and absent/wrong device. A data collection tool was created based on these categories as well as a free-text section to capture emergent DRI categories. After a brief training session, the tool was pilot tested by observers at a large academic referral center.

RESULTS

In a sample of 210 operations, observers noted 66 DRIs across 39 cases. DRIs were most common in colorectal (38.0 per 100 cases), gynecologic (33.3 per 100 cases), and hepatopancreatobiliary surgery (32.1 per 100 cases). Device failure accounted for 30.3% of observed DRIs. Three emergent categories were identified: user unfamiliarity with the device (15.2%), video display malfunction (4.5%), and physical breakage of the device (1.5%).

CONCLUSION

Measurement of DRIs by novice observers is a feasible and scalable approach to support quality improvement efforts focusing on surgical devices. This approach could provide actionable insights to improve device safety, such as informing educational and training programs, optimizing surgical tray composition, and improving the physical layout of the operating room.

摘要

背景

手术器械与大约 15%的术中中断和 25%的错误有关。因此,器械相关中断(DRIs)是外科质量改进的一个重要目标,但缺乏可扩展的测量方法。因此,研究人员开发、试点测试和改进了一种用于评估术中 DRI 的简单工具。

方法

五个 DRI 类别通过一线医务人员和外科安全专家获得了表面有效性:装配不当/具有挑战性、器械故障、失去无菌状态、断开连接以及缺少/错误的器械。基于这些类别以及用于捕获新兴 DRI 类别的自由文本部分,创建了一个数据收集工具。在简短的培训课程之后,该工具由一家大型学术转诊中心的观察员进行了试点测试。

结果

在 210 例手术的样本中,观察者在 39 例中记录了 66 例 DRI。DRIs 在结直肠手术(38.0 例/100 例)、妇科手术(33.3 例/100 例)和肝胆胰手术(32.1 例/100 例)中最为常见。器械故障占观察到的 DRI 的 30.3%。确定了三个新兴类别:使用者对器械不熟悉(15.2%)、视频显示故障(4.5%)和器械物理损坏(1.5%)。

结论

由新手观察员测量 DRI 是一种可行且可扩展的方法,可支持专注于手术器械的质量改进工作。这种方法可以提供可操作的见解,以提高设备安全性,例如告知教育和培训计划、优化手术托盘的组成以及改善手术室的物理布局。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验