Su Yu, Li Zhong, Zhang Chengcheng, Ai Xianjie, Wu Bo, Wang Qian, Ren Cheng, Ma Teng, Li Ming
Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Youyidong Road, Xi'an, 710000, Shaanxi, China.
Medical College, Yan'an University, Yan'an, Shaanxi, China.
J Robot Surg. 2025 Sep 13;19(1):599. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02787-3.
Retrograde intramedullary nailing is a common treatment for middle and lower femoral fractures where proximal locking is the main challenge. This study explored the application and experience of robot-assisted retrograde intramedullary nail proximal precision locking. Data from 74 patients with middle and lower femoral fractures treated with retrograde intramedullary nails between January 2021 and June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different proximal locking methods, the data were divided into a robotic group (34 cases) and a free-hand group (40 cases). General, perioperative, and follow-up data of the two groups were collected, and their differences were compared based on specified parameters. The results are as follows: the mean follow-up time was (16.10 ± 2.38) months, the number of screw placements in the robotic group (1.03 ± 0.17) was less than that in the manual group (1.63 ± 1.15, P = 0.004), and the number of fluoroscopies (1.06 ± 0.34) was significantly less than that in the manual group (6.35 ± 2.46, P < 0.001). Additionally, the total length of the proximal incision (2.16 ± 0.24) was shorter than that in the manual group (3.58 ± 0.38, P < 0.001), and the success rate of one-time screw placement (97.1%, 33/34) was significantly higher than that in the manual group (67.5%, 27/40; P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in the other indices of the two groups (P > 0.05). For the treatment of the middle and lower femoral fractures using a femoral retrograde intramedullary nail, the robotic navigation system is more efficient than traditional manual nail placement under fluoroscopy because it can shorten the number of proximal locking nail placements, the number of fluoroscopies, and the total length of the proximal incision. Additionally, it can reduce the exposure to external radiation and increase the success rate of one-time nail placement. Thus, this study presents a novel approach for the placement of proximal interlocking screws in femoral retrograde intramedullary nails, making it worthy of clinical application.
逆行髓内钉固定术是治疗股骨干中下段骨折的常用方法,其中近端锁定是主要挑战。本研究探讨了机器人辅助逆行髓内钉近端精准锁定的应用及经验。回顾性分析了2021年1月至2023年6月期间采用逆行髓内钉治疗的74例股骨干中下段骨折患者的数据。根据近端锁定方法的不同,将数据分为机器人组(34例)和徒手组(40例)。收集两组患者的一般资料、围手术期资料及随访资料,并根据指定参数比较两组差异。结果如下:平均随访时间为(16.10±2.38)个月,机器人组的螺钉置入数量(1.03±0.17)少于徒手组(1.63±1.15,P = 0.004),透视次数(1.06±0.34)显著少于徒手组(6.35±2.46,P < 0.001)。此外,近端切口总长度(2.16±0.24)短于徒手组(3.58±0.38,P < 0.001),一次性螺钉置入成功率(97.1%,33/34)显著高于徒手组(67.5%,27/40;P = 0.001)。两组其他指标差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。对于使用股骨逆行髓内钉治疗股骨干中下段骨折,机器人导航系统比传统透视下徒手置钉更有效,因为它可以减少近端锁定螺钉的置入数量、透视次数和近端切口总长度。此外,它还可以减少外部辐射暴露并提高一次性置钉成功率。因此,本研究提出了一种股骨逆行髓内钉近端交锁螺钉置入的新方法,值得临床应用。