• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经阴道臀位分娩后的新生儿入院率。

Neonatal admission rate after vaginal breech delivery.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.

Department of Neonatology, University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

J Perinat Med. 2022 Jul 13;50(9):1248-1255. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0202. Print 2022 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1515/jpm-2022-0202
PMID:35844089
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The safest mode of delivery for fetuses in breech presentations is still an ongoing debate. The aim of this study was to analyze neonatal admission rates after vaginal breech delivery and compare it to other modes of delivery in order to counsel pregnant women with breech presentation adequately.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of all deliveries with singleton pregnancies in breech presentation > 36.0 weeks of gestation between 01/2018-12/2019. Short-term neonatal morbidity data was collected for vaginal delivery and primary as well as secondary cesarean sections from breech presentations.

RESULTS

A total of n=41/482 (8.5%) neonates had to be admitted to NICU: vaginal breech delivery n=18/153 (11.8%), primary cesarean section n=9/101 (8.9%, OR 0.73; CI 0.32-1.70; p=0.47), secondary cesarean section n=10/76 (13.2%, OR 1.14; CI 0.50-2.60, p=0.76) and vaginal vertex delivery n=4/152 (2.6%, OR 0.20; CI 0.06-0.51; p=0.005). There was no significant difference in transfer to NICU between all breech position delivery modes. Despite significantly lower pH and 5' APGAR values after vaginal delivery, neonates delivered by primary cesarean section and NICU admission had to be treated there significantly longer (mean 80.9 vs. 174.0 h). No significant difference in terms of ventilation parameters and infections were found between the vaginal delivery, primary and secondary cesarean section from breech presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaginal breech delivery does not result in a higher neonatal admission rate in comparison to primary and secondary section. In contrast, there is a shorter NICU duration in case of neonatal admission after vaginal delivery.

摘要

目的

对于臀位胎儿来说,最安全的分娩方式仍存在争议。本研究旨在分析经阴道臀位分娩后的新生儿入院率,并与其他分娩方式进行比较,以便为臀位孕妇提供充分的咨询。

方法

我们对 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间所有>36.0 孕周单胎臀位妊娠的阴道分娩病例进行了回顾性单中心分析。收集了阴道分娩和经阴道分娩、初次剖宫产和二次剖宫产的新生儿短期发病率数据。

结果

共有 41/482(8.5%)例新生儿需要入住新生儿重症监护病房:阴道臀位分娩 18/153(11.8%)例,初次剖宫产 9/101(8.9%,OR 0.73;95%CI 0.32-1.70;p=0.47),二次剖宫产 10/76(13.2%,OR 1.14;95%CI 0.50-2.60,p=0.76),阴道头位分娩 4/152(2.6%,OR 0.20;95%CI 0.06-0.51;p=0.005)。各种臀位分娩方式的新生儿转至新生儿重症监护病房的比例无显著差异。尽管阴道分娩后 pH 值和 5' APGAR 值明显较低,但行初次剖宫产和需要入住新生儿重症监护病房的新生儿在那里接受治疗的时间明显更长(平均 80.9 小时 vs. 174.0 小时)。阴道分娩、初次剖宫产和臀位二次剖宫产的新生儿通气参数和感染方面无显著差异。

结论

与初次剖宫产和二次剖宫产相比,阴道臀位分娩并不会导致新生儿入院率升高。相反,阴道分娩后新生儿入院的新生儿重症监护病房停留时间更短。

相似文献

1
Neonatal admission rate after vaginal breech delivery.经阴道臀位分娩后的新生儿入院率。
J Perinat Med. 2022 Jul 13;50(9):1248-1255. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0202. Print 2022 Nov 25.
2
[Vaginal delivery versus cesarean section for term breech delivery].[足月臀位分娩的阴道分娩与剖宫产比较]
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2010 Oct;67(10):807-11. doi: 10.2298/vsp1010807b.
3
Neonatal outcome in vaginal breech labor at 32 + 0-36 + 0 weeks of gestation: a nationwide, population-based record linkage study.32 周零 0 天至 36 周零 0 天阴道臀位分娩的新生儿结局:一项全国性、基于人群的记录链接研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Mar 16;22(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04547-9.
4
Breech Presentation: Vaginal Versus Cesarean Delivery, Which Intervention Leads to the Best Outcomes?臀位分娩:经阴道分娩与剖宫产,哪种干预措施能带来最佳结局?
Acta Med Port. 2017 Jun 30;30(6):479-484. doi: 10.20344/amp.7920.
5
Vaginal breech delivery: results of a prospective registration study.阴道臀位分娩:一项前瞻性登记研究的结果
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Jul 24;13:153. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-153.
6
The influence of counseling on the mode of breech birth: A single-center observational prospective study in The Netherlands.咨询对臀位分娩方式的影响:荷兰一项单中心前瞻性观察研究
Midwifery. 2017 Dec;55:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
7
[Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Benefits and Risks for the Neonate and Child of Planned Vaginal Delivery versus Elective Cesarean Section].[臀位分娩:CNGOF临床实践指南——计划阴道分娩与选择性剖宫产对新生儿及儿童的益处与风险]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2020 Jan;48(1):95-108. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.10.023. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
8
Mode of delivery in breech presentation at term: increased neonatal morbidity with vaginal delivery.足月臀位分娩方式:阴道分娩增加新生儿发病率。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Aug;80(8):731-7. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.080008731.x.
9
Term cesarean breech delivery in the first pregnancy is associated with an increased risk for maternal and neonatal morbidity in the subsequent delivery: a national cohort study.初产妇剖宫产分娩臀位与随后分娩的母婴发病率增加相关:一项全国性队列研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jul;302(1):85-91. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05575-6. Epub 2020 May 14.
10
Neonatal outcome of singleton term breech deliveries in Norway from 1991 to 2011.1991年至2011年挪威单胎足月臀位分娩的新生儿结局。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Sep;94(9):997-1004. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12684. Epub 2015 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Vaginal breech delivery in all-fours position-Hands off instead of intervention: A prospective observational study.四肢位阴道臀位分娩——放手而非干预:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jun;104(6):1153-1161. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15078. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
2
The interplay of body mass index, gestational weight gain, and birthweight over 3800 g in vaginal breech birth: A retrospective study.阴道臀位分娩中体重指数、孕期体重增加与超过3800克出生体重之间的相互作用:一项回顾性研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jan;104(1):174-184. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15002. Epub 2024 Nov 9.
3
Novel Three-Dimensional Body Scan Anthropometry versus MR-Pelvimetry for Vaginal Breech Delivery Assessment.
用于阴道臀位分娩评估的新型三维全身扫描人体测量学与磁共振骨盆测量法对比
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 25;12(19):6181. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196181.