Abdessalami Souhailla, Rota Hanneke, Pereira Gabriella Dias, Roest Jan, Rosman Ageeth N
Department of Gynecology&Obstetrics, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, Vondellaan 13, 1942 LE Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Midwifery. 2017 Dec;55:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
women in the Netherlands, with a fetus in breech presentation, are thoroughly counseled to make an informed choice for the mode of delivery. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of counseling techniques on women's choices for the mode of delivery and subsequently to compare fetal and maternal outcomes of vaginal breech birth versus planned caesarean section.
we performed an observational prospective study. Data on breech deliveries were prospectively collected. We used ANOVA to identify variables influencing women's choice for the mode of delivery.
the obstetric department of the Red Cross Hospital in Beverwijk, the Netherlands.
women with a singleton gestation (>37 + 0 weeks) and a fetus in breech presentation were included.
between January 2007 and December 2015 364 women were included. Counseling technique (p =<0.001) and maternal education (p = 0.046) were significantly associated with the choice of mode of delivery. Of all included women 33% (N = 119) opted for a vaginal breech delivery and 52% (N = 190) opted for a planned cesarean section. 15% (N = 55) were unexpected breeches. Of the planned vaginal delivery group 66% (N = 79) delivered vaginal, whereas 99.5% (N = 189) of the women in the planned cesarean section group underwent a planned cesarean section. There were no significant differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes.
women's choice on the mode of delivery and the eventual modus partus of fetuses in breech presentation is strongly influenced by the counseling technique. Vaginal breech birth in low-risk women is a safe option without long term morbidity in neonates.
counselors should be aware of their influence on women's choice for mode of delivery in breech presentation. Counseling should be done using evidence based information.
在荷兰,对于臀位胎儿的孕妇,会给予她们充分的咨询,以便她们能做出关于分娩方式的明智选择。本研究的目的是评估咨询技巧对女性分娩方式选择的影响,并随后比较阴道臀位分娩与计划剖宫产的胎儿和产妇结局。
我们进行了一项观察性前瞻性研究。前瞻性收集了臀位分娩的数据。我们使用方差分析来确定影响女性分娩方式选择的变量。
荷兰贝弗维克红十字医院产科。
纳入单胎妊娠(>37 + 0周)且胎儿为臀位的女性。
2007年1月至2015年12月期间,纳入了364名女性。咨询技巧(p <= 0.001)和产妇教育程度(p = 0.046)与分娩方式的选择显著相关。在所有纳入的女性中,33%(N = 119)选择阴道臀位分娩,52%(N = 190)选择计划剖宫产。15%(N = 55)为意外臀位。在计划阴道分娩组中,66%(N = 79)经阴道分娩,而计划剖宫产组中99.5%(N = 189)的女性接受了计划剖宫产。母婴结局无显著差异。
咨询技巧对女性分娩方式的选择以及臀位胎儿最终的分娩方式有很大影响。低风险女性的阴道臀位分娩是一种安全的选择,新生儿无长期发病率。
咨询人员应意识到他们对臀位分娩女性分娩方式选择的影响。咨询应基于循证信息进行。