• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Characteristics of Pharmacists' Interventions Related to Proton-Pump Inhibitors in French Hospitals: An Observational Study.法国医院中与质子泵抑制剂相关的药师干预特征:一项观察性研究。
Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Jun 28;2022:9619699. doi: 10.1155/2022/9619699. eCollection 2022.
2
Trends in pharmacists' medication order review in French hospitals from 2006 to 2009: analysis of pharmacists' interventions from the Act-IP© website observatory.2006年至2009年法国医院药剂师医嘱审核趋势:基于Act-IP©网站观察站对药剂师干预措施的分析
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2015 Feb;40(1):32-40. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12214. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
3
Assessment of clinical pharmacists' interventions in French hospitals: results of a multicenter study.法国医院临床药师干预措施的评估:一项多中心研究的结果。
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Jul;42(7):1095-103. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L045. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
4
[Pharmacists' interventions conducted by hospital pharmacists on psychotropic drugs pharmacotherapy].[医院药剂师对精神药物药物治疗的干预措施]
Encephale. 2015 Sep;41(4):339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
5
Using national data to describe characteristics and determine acceptance factors of pharmacists' interventions: a six-year longitudinal study.利用国家数据描述药剂师干预措施的特征并确定其接受因素:一项为期六年的纵向研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Apr;45(2):430-441. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01526-0. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
6
Evaluation of drug-related problems and subsequent clinical pharmacists' interventions at a Swiss university hospital.评估药物相关问题及随后临床药师在瑞士大学附属医院的干预措施。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Dec;44(6):924-931. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13017. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
7
Characteristic of drug-related problems and pharmacists' interventions in a stroke unit in Thailand.药物相关问题的特征及药师在泰国卒中单元的干预措施。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Aug;41(4):880-887. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00832-4. Epub 2019 May 3.
8
Identification of drug-related problems by a clinical pharmacist in addition to computerized alerts.临床药师通过计算机化警示以外的方式识别药物相关问题。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Oct;35(5):753-62. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9798-4. Epub 2013 May 29.
9
[Pharmacist's interventions on proton pump inhibitor prescriptions in a University Hospital].[药剂师对某大学医院质子泵抑制剂处方的干预措施]
J Pharm Belg. 2015 Jun(2):20-9.
10
Drug related problems and pharmacist interventions in a geriatric unit employing electronic prescribing.电子处方在老年病房中应用所产生的药物相关问题及药剂师干预
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Oct;35(5):847-53. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9821-9. Epub 2013 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Community Pharmacists Regarding Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) Use: A Cross-Sectional Study.社区药剂师对质子泵抑制剂(PPI)使用的知识、态度和实践:一项横断面研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 2;13(13):1588. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131588.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis on pharmacist-led interventions for the management of peptic ulcer disease.关于药师主导的消化性溃疡疾病管理干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0320181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320181. eCollection 2025.
3
Inappropriate prescribing of drugs for peptic ulcer and gastro-esophageal reflux disease remains a matter of concern: Results from the LAPTOP-PPI cluster randomized trial.消化性溃疡和胃食管反流病药物的不适当处方仍然令人担忧:LAPTOP-PPI 整群随机试验的结果。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 3;15:1430879. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1430879. eCollection 2024.
4
Deprescribing of proton pump inhibitors in older patients: A cost-effectiveness analysis.老年患者质子泵抑制剂的撤药:成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 7;19(10):e0311658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311658. eCollection 2024.
5
A study of pharmacists-joint total parenteral nutrition in haematopoietic cell transplantation in accord with diagnosis related groups: A retrospective clinical research.一项根据诊断相关分组对造血细胞移植中药剂师参与全胃肠外营养的研究:一项回顾性临床研究。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Jun 25;17(1):2361320. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2361320. eCollection 2024.
6
Impact of pharmacist-evaluated clinical decision support system alerts on potentially missing or inappropriately prescribed proton pump inhibitors at hospital discharge: a retrospective cross-sectional study.药师评估的临床决策支持系统警报对出院时潜在漏用或不适当处方质子泵抑制剂的影响:一项回顾性横断面研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Oct;46(5):1143-1151. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01746-6. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
7
Treating and Managing Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease in the Over 65s: Evidence to Date.治疗和管理 65 岁以上人群的咽喉反流疾病:现有证据。
Clin Interv Aging. 2022 Nov 15;17:1625-1633. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S371992. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Umbrella review of 42 systematic reviews with meta-analyses: the safety of proton pump inhibitors.42 项系统评价和荟萃分析的伞状评价:质子泵抑制剂的安全性。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jul;54(2):129-143. doi: 10.1111/apt.16407. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
2
[Evaluation of the implantation of a de-prescribing process for proton pump inhibitor (PPI) using an algorithm within an internal medicine department].[在内科使用算法对质子泵抑制剂(PPI)进行撤药流程植入的评估]
Rev Med Interne. 2021 Aug;42(8):535-540. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
3
Reported proton pump inhibitor side effects: what are physician and patient perspectives and behaviour patterns?报告的质子泵抑制剂副作用:医生和患者的观点和行为模式是什么?
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Jan;51(1):121-128. doi: 10.1111/apt.15522. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
4
Improving care for elderly patients living with polypharmacy: protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial in community-based primary care practices in Canada.提高同时服用多种药物的老年患者的护理水平:在加拿大社区基层医疗实践中开展实用型整群随机试验的方案。
Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 6;14(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0904-4.
5
The clinical impact of medication reconciliation on admission to a French hospital: a prospective observational study.药物重整对入住法国医院的临床影响:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2016 Jul;23(4):207-212. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2015-000745. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
6
Pharmaceutical care in a long-stay psychiatric hospital.长期住院精神病院的药学服务
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2016 May;23(3):177-181. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2015-000718. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
7
Proton pump inhibitors: why this gap between guidelines and prescribing practices in geriatrics?质子泵抑制剂:老年医学指南与处方实践之间为何存在这种差距?
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Sep;75(9):1327-1329. doi: 10.1007/s00228-019-02692-3. Epub 2019 May 25.
8
Continuation or deprescribing of proton pump inhibitors: A consult patient decision aid.质子泵抑制剂的继续使用或停用:一份供咨询患者的决策辅助工具。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2018 Dec 17;152(1):18-22. doi: 10.1177/1715163518816719. eCollection 2019 Jan-Feb.
9
Deprescribing conversations: a closer look at prescriber-patient communication.减药对话:深入探讨开方者与患者之间的沟通
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2018 Oct 20;9(12):687-698. doi: 10.1177/2042098618804490. eCollection 2018 Dec.
10
Inappropriate Prescription of Proton Pump Inhibitors in a Community Setting.社区环境中质子泵抑制剂的不恰当处方
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2018 Jul-Aug;71(4):267-271. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

法国医院中与质子泵抑制剂相关的药师干预特征:一项观察性研究。

Characteristics of Pharmacists' Interventions Related to Proton-Pump Inhibitors in French Hospitals: An Observational Study.

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.

Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, UR 4129 Parcours Santé Systémique, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Jun 28;2022:9619699. doi: 10.1155/2022/9619699. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/9619699
PMID:35846437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9256420/
Abstract

METHODS

The study was based on a retrospective analysis of pharmacist interventions for DRPs detected during the medication order review and documented into the French Act-IP© database over a 12-year period. DRPs and PIs were analyzed, and independent factors of physician acceptance were assessed via multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

Out of the 620,620 PIs registered, 29,694 targeted a PPI (4.8%). PPI's DRPs were mostly related to the prescription of a "drug not available at the hospital" (26.1%) and a "drug use without indication" (18.3%); PIs were mostly "drug switch" (35.9%) and "drug discontinuation" (26.1%). In all, 18,919 PIs were accepted by physicians (63.7%). Acceptance was significantly associated with patient age: less accepted for the 18-75 years group (OR = 0.59, 95 CI [0.46-0.76]), and the >75 years group (OR = 0.57, 95 CI [0.44-0.73]) vs. <18 years group; for the type of DRP, "drug use without indication" was the less accepted (OR = 0.73, 95 CI [0.63-0.85]); for the type of PI, "dose adjustment" was the less accepted (OR = 0.32, 95 CI [0.23-0.45]).

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists contribute to preventing DRPs associated with PPI prescriptions during the medication order review process. Moreover, they often detect PPIs used without indication and they propose drug discontinuation, which contributes to the PPI deprescribing process. PIs should be further developed in the future to reduce PPI overprescription.

摘要

方法

本研究基于对药物医嘱审核期间发现的用药差错(DRP)进行回顾性分析,这些差错通过法国 Act-IP©数据库记录,时间跨度为 12 年。分析了 DRP 和药师干预措施(PI),并通过多因素逻辑回归评估了医生接受 PI 的独立影响因素。

结果

在登记的 620620 次 PI 中,有 29694 次针对质子泵抑制剂(PPI)(4.8%)。PPI 的 DRP 主要与处方“医院无供应药品”(26.1%)和“无指征用药”(18.3%)有关;PI 主要是“药物替换”(35.9%)和“药物停用”(26.1%)。总体而言,18919 次 PI 被医生接受(63.7%)。接受度与患者年龄显著相关:18-75 岁组(OR=0.59,95%CI [0.46-0.76])和>75 岁组(OR=0.57,95%CI [0.44-0.73])的接受度低于<18 岁组;对于 DRP 类型,“无指征用药”的接受度较低(OR=0.73,95%CI [0.63-0.85]);对于 PI 类型,“剂量调整”的接受度较低(OR=0.32,95%CI [0.23-0.45])。

结论

药师在药物医嘱审核过程中有助于预防与 PPI 处方相关的用药差错。此外,药师经常发现无指征使用 PPI,并提出药物停用,这有助于 PPI 撤药过程。未来应进一步开展 PI 工作,以减少 PPI 的过度处方。