Ilickovic Ivana M, Jankovic Slobodan M, Tomcuk Aleksandar, Djedovic Jovo
Regulatory, Pharmacovigilance and Quality Department, Farmegra Ltd, Podgorica, Montenegro.
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2016 May;23(3):177-181. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2015-000718. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
The aim of this study was to evaluate implementation of services provided by a clinical pharmacist for long-term-hospitalised patients with schizophrenia in a pharmaceutical-care-naive developing country.
This was a prospective, healthcare-system, interventional, 'before-and-after' study. Long-term (≥6 months) inpatients with schizophrenia were included. A clinical pharmacist reviewed the full patient notes, identified drug-related problems (DRPs), and proposed interventions using a DRP Registration Form (PCNE classification V6.2). Acceptance rate and outcomes of interventions were assessed.
For 49 patients, 71 DRPs were identified, ranging from one to four problems/patient (1.43±0.68), predominantly related to tolerability and treatment effectiveness. The DRPs were mostly caused (N=184) by inappropriate drug selection (64%) or dose (23.4%): too many drugs for indication (N=33); a non-cost-effective choice (N=29); inappropriate combination (N=27); an inappropriate drug (N=23); lack of therapeutic drug monitoring (N=14); subtherapeutic (N=13) or supratherapeutic (N=11) dosing. Excessive treatment duration was observed for 14 DRPs. The clinical pharmacist proposed 182 interventions (70% at the drug level): discontinuation of medication (N=58); dosage change (N=35); other interventions (monitoring) (N=35); a change of drug (N=18) or instructions for use (N=9); and/or introduction of a new drug (N=7). Physicians accepted 91 interventions and refused 36. Finally, 38 DRPs were solved (25 completely and 13 partially), for 25 a solution was either not needed or not possible, and, for eight, the outcome was not known.
The study underlines the high potential for pharmaceutical care to improve prescribing practices in developing countries without shared pharmacist-physician decision-making.
本研究旨在评估在一个尚未开展药学服务的发展中国家,临床药师为长期住院的精神分裂症患者提供服务的实施情况。
这是一项前瞻性、医疗系统干预性的“前后对照”研究。纳入长期(≥6个月)住院的精神分裂症患者。临床药师查阅完整的患者病历,识别药物相关问题(DRP),并使用DRP登记表(PCNE分类V6.2)提出干预措施。评估干预措施的接受率和结果。
共纳入49例患者,识别出71个DRP,每位患者的问题数为1至4个(1.43±0.68),主要与耐受性和治疗效果有关。这些DRP大多(N=184)是由药物选择不当(64%)或剂量问题(23.4%)引起的:用药指征过多(N=33);选择了非性价比高的药物(N=29);药物组合不当(N=27);药物不合适(N=23);缺乏治疗药物监测(N=14);剂量低于治疗量(N=13)或高于治疗量(N=11)。14个DRP存在治疗时间过长的问题。临床药师提出了182项干预措施(70%为药物层面的干预):停药(N=58);剂量调整(N=35);其他干预措施(监测)(N=35);更换药物(N=18)或使用说明(N=9);和/或引入新药(N=7)。医生接受了91项干预措施,拒绝了36项。最终,38个DRP得到解决(25个完全解决,13个部分解决),25个DRP不需要或无法解决,8个DRP的结果未知。
该研究强调了在没有药师与医生共同决策的情况下,药学服务在改善发展中国家处方行为方面具有很大潜力。