• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学职业轨迹与发表表现——匈牙利学术晋升体系中的发现关系

Scientific career tracks and publication performance - relationships discovered in the Hungarian academic promotion system.

作者信息

Sasvari Peter, Bakacsi Gyula, Urbanovics Anna

机构信息

University of Miskolc, Egyetemvaros, Miskolc, 3515, Hungary.

Budapest Business School, Buzogany u. 10-12, Budapest, 1149, Hungary.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2022 Mar 23;8(3):e09159. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09159. eCollection 2022 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09159
PMID:35846439
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9280584/
Abstract

The paper aims to investigate the research patterns of Hungarian university full professors and career pathways in various disciplines. Hungary has a so-called 'multi-stage' formalized hierarchy that clearly defines the steps leading to achieve the appointment of full professor. Following the theoretical chapter in which different career scenarios - such as 'Top Researcher', 'Outstanding Lecturer' and 'Local Manager' are presented, an empirical analysis is carried out. The sample consists of a group of 327 professors. Our results point out that there are different research patterns and a significant gap can be observed between disciplines rather preferring international publication (scored by SJR) and the ones opting for publishing monographs. As far as career paths concerned, it was found that the number of years until reaching the PhD degree ranges between 6-13 years, 15.5-22 years are needed on average to achieve habilitation, while the time needed for getting the title of full professor ranges between 22-27 years. It is clearly perceivable that the gap in the number of years converges until reaching full professorship in each and every discipline.

摘要

本文旨在研究匈牙利大学正教授的研究模式以及各学科的职业发展路径。匈牙利有所谓的“多阶段”形式化等级制度,明确界定了获得正教授职位所需的步骤。在呈现了不同职业情景(如“顶尖研究员”“杰出讲师”和“本地管理者”)的理论章节之后,进行了实证分析。样本包括327名教授。我们的研究结果指出,存在不同的研究模式,并且在更倾向于国际出版物(由SJR评分)的学科和选择出版专著的学科之间,可以观察到显著差距。就职业发展路径而言,发现获得博士学位所需的年限在6至13年之间,平均需要15.5至22年才能获得资格认定,而获得正教授头衔所需的时间在22至27年之间。可以明显看出,在每个学科中,直到获得正教授职位时,年限差距会逐渐缩小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cfe/9280584/46b7db4790f5/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cfe/9280584/f921da8afea8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cfe/9280584/ebf86e552afa/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cfe/9280584/ff0222e04cc9/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cfe/9280584/92454acc8c80/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cfe/9280584/46b7db4790f5/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cfe/9280584/f921da8afea8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cfe/9280584/ebf86e552afa/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cfe/9280584/ff0222e04cc9/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cfe/9280584/92454acc8c80/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cfe/9280584/46b7db4790f5/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Scientific career tracks and publication performance - relationships discovered in the Hungarian academic promotion system.科学职业轨迹与发表表现——匈牙利学术晋升体系中的发现关系
Heliyon. 2022 Mar 23;8(3):e09159. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09159. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Perceptions of publication pressure among Hungarian researchers: Differences across career stage, gender, and scientific field.匈牙利研究人员对发表压力的看法:不同职业阶段、性别和科学领域的差异。
Account Res. 2023 Dec;30(8):766-775. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2081917. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
3
Sex Differences in Academic Rank and Publication Rate at Top-Ranked US Neurology Programs.顶尖美国神经病学项目的学术排名和发表率中的性别差异。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Aug 1;75(8):956-961. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0275.
4
How to become a medical professor - a comparative analysis of academic requirements in Germany and the United States.如何成为一名医学教授——德国和美国学术要求的比较分析
Innov Surg Sci. 2019 Aug 22;4(3):108-115. doi: 10.1515/iss-2019-0011. eCollection 2019 Sep.
5
[Careers in plastic and aesthetic surgery: a review of habilitation and professorship of members of the DGPRAEC].
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2017 Sep;49(4):273-277. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-117737. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
6
Comparison of scientometric achievements at PhD and scientific output ten years later for 4,790 academic researchers.比较 4790 名学术研究人员的博士阶段科研成就和十年后科研产出的文献计量学指标。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 27;17(7):e0271218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271218. eCollection 2022.
7
National criteria for academic appointment in vascular surgery.国家血管外科学术任职资格标准。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 May;69(5):1559-1565. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.178.
8
Performance curves of medical researchers during their career: analysis of scientific production from a retrospective cohort.医学研究人员职业生涯中的表现曲线:一项回顾性队列研究的科研产出分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 24;7(2):e013572. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013572.
9
Women's Experiences of Promotion and Tenure in Academic Medicine and Potential Implications for Gender Disparities in Career Advancement: A Qualitative Analysis.女性在学术医学领域的晋升经历及其对职业发展中性别差异的潜在影响:一项定性分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2125843. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25843.
10
[Lecturers in chemistry at the Medical Faculty of the University of Nagyszombat].[瑙吉松博特大学医学院的化学讲师]
Orvostort Kozl. 1994;40(3-4):45-54.

本文引用的文献

1
The k-index is introduced to replace the h-index to evaluate better the scientific excellence of individuals.引入k指数以取代h指数,以便更好地评估个人的科研卓越性。
Heliyon. 2020 Jul 11;6(7):e04415. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04415. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
To protect credibility in science, banish "publish or perish".为保护科学的可信度,摒弃“不发表就出局”的观念。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Oct;3(10):1017-1018. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0741-0.
3
Payouts push professors towards predatory journals.薪酬激励促使教授们投向掠夺性期刊。
Nature. 2019 Jan;565(7739):267. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00120-1.
4
Professionals' use of different mentor sources at various career stages: implications for career success.专业人士在不同职业阶段对不同导师来源的使用:对职业成功的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2000 Oct;140(5):549-64. doi: 10.1080/00224540009600495.