• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 4790 名学术研究人员的博士阶段科研成就和十年后科研产出的文献计量学指标。

Comparison of scientometric achievements at PhD and scientific output ten years later for 4,790 academic researchers.

机构信息

Department of Bioinformatics and 2nd Dept. of Pediatrics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

TTK Lendület Cancer Biomarker Research Group, Institute of Enzymology, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jul 27;17(7):e0271218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271218. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0271218
PMID:35895676
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9328526/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

PhD is the highest awarded degree offered by universities in different disciplines. Owners of a PhD can teach at universities, start independent research and receive a higher salary while further building a scientific career. We examined whether the publication output before the PhD degree has a correlation with subsequent research activities.

METHODS

We downloaded publication and citation data from the Hungarian Scientific Bibliography for Hungarian researchers who obtained PhD between the ages of 24 and 45. The researchers were grouped into eleven scientific sections. We examined the number of Q1 publications published in the previous 5 years, the H-index, the total number of citations for the last complete year, and the biological age of the researcher. Each parameter was computed for the year at which the PhD was obtained and ten years later. Pre-PhD publications (and citations for these) were excluded when assessing post-PhD track records. Spearman rank correlation and Kruskal-Wallis test were computed.

RESULTS

We analyzed all together 4,790 researchers. We obtained a positive correlation between the number of Q1 publications before and after PhD (corr. coeff. = 0.21-0.54, p<0.01 in all sections), between the H-index before and after PhD (corr. coeff. = 0.32-0.56, p<0.01 in all sections), and between the citations received before and after PhD (corr. coeff. = 0.34-0.51, p<0.01 in all sections). All three metrics measured ten years after the PhD were negatively correlated with the age of the researcher at the time of obtaining the PhD (number of publications corr. coeff. = -0.09-0.22, p<0.05; H-index corr. coeff. = -0.09-0.29, p<0.08; number of citations corr. coeff. = -0.14-0.30, p<0.01). Among all disciplines, Philosophy and History and Engineering sciences show the strongest correlation between pre- and post-PhD output. When running multiple regression analysis for all three metrics as dependent variables and the number of articles, the H-index, the number of citations in the year of the PhD, the calendar year of PhD, and the gender of the researcher as independent variables, the number of articles and the H-index in the year of PhD reached the strongest positive correlations while gender had a negative correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

We independently evaluated pre- and post-PhD publication performance. In connection with age, the discipline-specific reference values of scientometric parameters at the time of obtaining the PhD can help to select candidates for postdoctoral grants and positions.

摘要

简介

博士是不同学科的大学授予的最高学位。拥有博士学位的人可以在大学任教,开展独立研究,并获得更高的薪水,同时进一步发展自己的科研事业。我们研究了博士学位之前的论文发表量是否与后续的研究活动有关。

方法

我们从匈牙利科学书目下载了在 24 岁至 45 岁之间获得博士学位的匈牙利研究人员的论文发表和引用数据。研究人员被分为 11 个科学领域。我们考察了过去 5 年中发表的 Q1 论文数量、H 指数、上一年的总引用次数以及研究人员的生物学年龄。每个参数都是在获得博士学位的那一年和十年后计算的。在评估博士毕业后的记录时,不考虑博士前的论文发表情况(以及这些论文的引用情况)。我们计算了 Spearman 秩相关系数和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验。

结果

我们共分析了 4790 名研究人员。我们发现博士前和博士后的 Q1 论文发表数量之间存在正相关(所有领域的相关系数为 0.21-0.54,p<0.01),博士前和博士后的 H 指数之间存在正相关(所有领域的相关系数为 0.32-0.56,p<0.01),以及博士前和博士后的引用次数之间存在正相关(所有领域的相关系数为 0.34-0.51,p<0.01)。所有三个指标在获得博士学位十年后与研究人员获得博士学位时的年龄呈负相关(发表论文数量相关系数为-0.09-0.22,p<0.05;H 指数相关系数为-0.09-0.29,p<0.08;引用次数相关系数为-0.14-0.30,p<0.01)。在所有学科中,哲学和历史与工程科学之间表现出最强的博士前和博士后产出相关性。当我们将三个指标(作为因变量)分别与发表文章数量、H 指数、博士学位当年的引用次数、博士学位授予年份和研究人员性别作为自变量进行多元回归分析时,博士学位当年的发表文章数量和 H 指数呈现出最强的正相关关系,而性别则呈现出负相关关系。

结论

我们独立评估了博士前和博士后的论文发表表现。结合年龄,在获得博士学位时的科学计量参数的学科特定参考值可以帮助选择博士后奖学金和职位的候选人。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ce/9328526/d92f9a1009ee/pone.0271218.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ce/9328526/177c39c6bae4/pone.0271218.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ce/9328526/57f82fd8520f/pone.0271218.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ce/9328526/d92f9a1009ee/pone.0271218.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ce/9328526/177c39c6bae4/pone.0271218.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ce/9328526/57f82fd8520f/pone.0271218.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ce/9328526/d92f9a1009ee/pone.0271218.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of scientometric achievements at PhD and scientific output ten years later for 4,790 academic researchers.比较 4790 名学术研究人员的博士阶段科研成就和十年后科研产出的文献计量学指标。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 27;17(7):e0271218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271218. eCollection 2022.
2
Factors influencing the scientific performance of Momentum grant holders: an evaluation of the first 117 research groups.影响“动力”资助获得者科研绩效的因素:对首批117个研究团队的评估
Scientometrics. 2018;117(1):409-426. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2852-1. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
3
Supporting grant reviewers through the scientometric ranking of applicants.通过对申请人的科学计量排名来支持资助评审员。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 20;18(1):e0280480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280480. eCollection 2023.
4
The Association Between Professional Accounts on Social Networks Twitter and ResearchGate and the Number of Scientific Publications and Citations Among Anesthesia Researchers: Observational Study.社交媒体平台 Twitter 和 ResearchGate 上的专业账号与麻醉研究人员的科研出版物数量和引用次数的关联:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 15;23(10):e29809. doi: 10.2196/29809.
5
Careers of an elite cohort of U.S. basic life science postdoctoral fellows and the influence of their mentor's citation record.美国基础生命科学博士后精英群体的职业发展及其导师引文记录的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2010 Nov 15;10:80. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-80.
6
Taking the next step in publication productivity analysis in pediatric neurosurgery.迈向小儿神经外科出版生产力分析的下一步。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018 Jun;21(6):655-665. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.PEDS17535. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
7
Analysis of the distribution and scholarly output from National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia (NIAA) research grants.分析国家学术麻醉研究所(NIAA)研究资助的分布和学术成果。
Anaesthesia. 2018 Jun;73(6):679-691. doi: 10.1111/anae.14277. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
8
Scientific output quality of 40 globally top-ranked medical researchers in the field of osteoporosis.骨质疏松症领域全球排名前 40 位的医学研究人员的科研产出质量。
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Mar 26;13(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0446-4.
9
Associations Between NIH Funding and Advanced Bibliometric Indices Among Radiological Investigators.美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助与放射学研究人员的高级文献计量指标之间的关联。
Acad Radiol. 2016 Jun;23(6):669-74. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
10
Predicting academic career outcomes by predoctoral publication record.通过博士前发表记录预测学术职业成果。
PeerJ. 2018 Oct 4;6:e5707. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5707. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Productivity and Quality of Publications Derived From Doctoral Theses and the Scientific Performance of Graduates at a Romanian Medical and Pharmacy University.罗马尼亚一所医科和药科大学博士论文衍生出版物的生产力和质量评估以及毕业生的科研表现
Cureus. 2025 Jun 29;17(6):e86947. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86947. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
What are the foundations of a good PhD?
Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Oct;23(4):94-96. doi: 10.1136/ebnurs-2020-103353.
2
Do successful PhD outcomes reflect the research environment rather than academic ability?博士生的成功结果反映的是研究环境,而不是学术能力吗?
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 5;15(8):e0236327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236327. eCollection 2020.
3
Regulations and practices of structured doctoral education in the life sciences in Germany.德国生命科学领域结构化博士教育的规定和实践。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 30;15(7):e0233415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233415. eCollection 2020.
4
Mentoring for postdoctoral researchers in rheumatology: the Emerging EULAR Network (EMEUNET) post-doc mentoring programme.风湿病学博士后研究人员的指导:新兴的 EULAR 网络(EMEUNET)博士后指导计划。
RMD Open. 2020 Feb;6(1). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001139. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
5
An analysis of the productivity and impact of clinical PhD theses from the University of Copenhagen.哥本哈根大学临床博士论文的生产力与影响力分析。
Dan Med J. 2020 May 1;67(5):A12190731.
6
Why, When, Who, What, How, and Where for Trainees Writing Literature Review Articles.为何、何时、何人、何事、如何、何地撰写文献综述文章给学员。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2019 Nov;47(11):2334-2340. doi: 10.1007/s10439-019-02290-5. Epub 2019 May 21.
7
Factors influencing the scientific performance of Momentum grant holders: an evaluation of the first 117 research groups.影响“动力”资助获得者科研绩效的因素:对首批117个研究团队的评估
Scientometrics. 2018;117(1):409-426. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2852-1. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
8
Leadership and Presenteeism among Scientific Staff: The Role of Accumulation of Work and Time Pressure.科研人员中的领导力与出勤主义:工作积累和时间压力的作用。
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 25;8:1885. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01885. eCollection 2017.
9
I-determinants for a successful PhD or postdoctoral outcome.成功获得博士学位或博士后成果的自我决定因素。
Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Aug 12;8:297-303. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S110527. eCollection 2016.
10
Low immediate scientific yield of the PhD among medical doctors.医学博士中博士学位的即时科学产出较低。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 24;16:189. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0713-2.