Clinical assessment for pulmonary hypertension in interstitial lung disease.

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an important complication of interstitial lung disease (ILD), as its development confers a poor prognosis. There are no specific recommendations for methods of assessment for PH in ILD populations.

AIMS

To determine current assessment practices for PH in an Australian ILD centre.

METHODS

In the Austin Health ILD database, 162 consecutive patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis or connective tissue disease-associated ILD were identified and retrospectively evaluated for methods of PH assessment with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and right heart catheterisation (RHC) in relation to patient demographic and physiological parameters.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 30 (14.4-56.4) months. At baseline, vital capacity was 80.0 ± 18.4% predicted, and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide was 59.6 ± 15.2% predicted. Evaluation for PH was performed in 147 (90.7%) patients, among whom 105 (64.8%) had TTE performed at least once. At the initial TTE, 33.7% patients had high probability of PH, defined as RVSP >40 mmHg + RAp and/or right ventricular dysfunction. At the time of the most recent TTE, these criteria were met in 45 (52.3%) patients. Elevated serum NT-proBNP levels during the first year were observed in 47 (38.8%) patients. Only 14 (8.6%) patients had RHC.

CONCLUSION

Our institutional PH assessment practice in ILD demonstrates a substantial prevalence of probable PH at baseline. As new therapies emerge for the treatment of PH in ILD, well-defined screening practices are important in this population for early identification and optimal management.