• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prediction of Maternal Hemorrhage Using Machine Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study.利用机器学习预测产妇出血:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 18;24(7):e34108. doi: 10.2196/34108.
2
Machine learning-based prediction of postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery: combining bleeding high risk factors and uterine contraction curve.基于机器学习的阴道分娩后产后出血预测:结合出血高危因素和子宫收缩曲线。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Oct;306(4):1015-1025. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06377-0. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
3
Machine learning approach for the prediction of postpartum hemorrhage in vaginal birth.机器学习方法预测阴道分娩产后出血。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 19;11(1):22620. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02198-y.
4
Interpretable machine learning predicts postpartum hemorrhage with severe maternal morbidity in a lower-risk laboring obstetric population.可解释的机器学习在低风险分娩的产科人群中预测伴有严重孕产妇发病的产后出血。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Aug;6(8):101391. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101391. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
5
Machine Learning and Statistical Models to Predict Postpartum Hemorrhage.机器学习和统计模型预测产后出血。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;135(4):935-944. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003759.
6
Development and validation of a prediction model for postpartum hemorrhage at a single safety net tertiary care center.开发并验证了一个单一的三级医疗保健网络中心产后出血预测模型。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Sep;3(5):100404. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100404. Epub 2021 May 25.
7
Prediction of obstetrical and fetal complications using automated electronic health record data.利用自动化电子健康记录数据预测产科和胎儿并发症。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb;224(2):137-147.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.030. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
8
Prediction of postpartum hemorrhage using traditional statistical analysis and a machine learning approach.使用传统统计分析和机器学习方法预测产后出血。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 Feb 17;3(2):100185. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100185. eCollection 2023 May.
9
Development and validation of an artificial neural network prediction model for postpartum hemorrhage with placenta previa.开发和验证一种用于前置胎盘产后出血的人工神经网络预测模型。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2023 Nov;89(11):977-985. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.23.17366-4. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
10
Prediction of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) using machine learning algorithms in a Kenyan population.在肯尼亚人群中使用机器学习算法预测产后出血(PPH)。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Jul 28;4:1161157. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1161157. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning Models to Predict Risk of Maternal Morbidity and Mortality From Electronic Medical Record Data: Scoping Review.利用电子病历数据预测孕产妇发病和死亡风险的机器学习模型:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 14;27:e68225. doi: 10.2196/68225.
2
Development and Validation of An Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Placenta Previa Following Cesarean Section: A Multicenter Study.剖宫产术后前置胎盘产后出血的可解释机器学习预测模型的开发与验证:一项多中心研究
Reprod Sci. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s43032-025-01937-0.
3
Artificial Intelligence and Postpartum Hemorrhage.人工智能与产后出血
Matern Fetal Med. 2025 Jan;7(1):22-28. doi: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000257. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
4
Accuracy of machine learning and traditional statistical models in the prediction of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review.机器学习和传统统计模型预测产后出血的准确性:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):e094455. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094455.
5
Artificial intelligence-based prediction of second stage duration in labor: a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis.基于人工智能的产程第二阶段持续时间预测:一项多中心回顾性队列分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jan 20;80:103072. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103072. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Application of Predictive Analytics in Pregnancy, Birth, and Postpartum Nursing Care.预测分析在妊娠、分娩及产后护理中的应用。
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2025;50(2):66-77. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000001082. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
7
Quantitative prediction of postpartum hemorrhage in cesarean section on machine learning.机器学习在剖宫产术中产后出血的定量预测。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02571-7.
8
Prediction of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) using machine learning algorithms in a Kenyan population.在肯尼亚人群中使用机器学习算法预测产后出血(PPH)。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Jul 28;4:1161157. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1161157. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine Learning and Statistical Models to Predict Postpartum Hemorrhage.机器学习和统计模型预测产后出血。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;135(4):935-944. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003759.
2
Predicting common maternal postpartum complications: leveraging health administrative data and machine learning.预测常见的产妇产后并发症:利用健康管理数据和机器学习。
BJOG. 2019 May;126(6):702-709. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15607. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
3
Development and validation of a predictive model for excessive postpartum blood loss: A retrospective, cohort study.产后出血量过多预测模型的建立与验证:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Mar;79:114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
4
Machine Learning in Medicine.医学中的机器学习
Circulation. 2015 Nov 17;132(20):1920-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593.
5
Revisit of risk factors for major obstetric hemorrhage: insights from a large medical center.重大产科出血风险因素的再探讨:来自大型医疗中心的见解
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;292(4):819-28. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3725-y. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
6
Levels of maternal care.产妇护理水平。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):259-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.030. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
7
Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis.全球孕产妇死亡原因:世卫组织系统分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e323-33. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X. Epub 2014 May 5.
8
Executive summary of the reVITALize initiative: standardizing obstetric data definitions.重新焕发活力计划执行摘要:标准化产科数据定义。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;124(1):150-153. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000322.
9
Prediction of postpartum hemorrhage in women with gestational hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term.预测足月妊娠伴妊娠期高血压或轻度子痫前期的妇女产后出血。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Apr;93(4):399-407. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12352.
10
Maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States: where are we now?美国孕产妇死亡率和发病率:我们现在处于什么位置?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Jan;23(1):3-9. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4617.

利用机器学习预测产妇出血:回顾性队列研究。

Prediction of Maternal Hemorrhage Using Machine Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States.

Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 18;24(7):e34108. doi: 10.2196/34108.

DOI:10.2196/34108
PMID:35849436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9345059/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postpartum hemorrhage remains one of the largest causes of maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper is to use machine learning techniques to identify patients at risk for postpartum hemorrhage at obstetric delivery.

METHODS

Women aged 18 to 55 years delivering at a major academic center from July 2013 to October 2018 were included for analysis (N=30,867). A total of 497 variables were collected from the electronic medical record including the following: demographic information; obstetric, medical, surgical, and family history; vital signs; laboratory results; labor medication exposures; and delivery outcomes. Postpartum hemorrhage was defined as a blood loss of ≥1000 mL at the time of delivery, regardless of delivery method, with 2179 (7.1%) positive cases observed. Supervised learning with regression-, tree-, and kernel-based machine learning methods was used to create classification models based upon training (21,606/30,867, 70%) and validation (4630/30,867, 15%) cohorts. Models were tuned using feature selection algorithms and domain knowledge. An independent test cohort (4631/30,867, 15%) determined final performance by assessing for accuracy, area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC), and sensitivity for proper classification of postpartum hemorrhage. Separate models were created using all collected data versus models limited to data available prior to the second stage of labor or at the time of decision to proceed with cesarean delivery. Additional models examined patients by mode of delivery.

RESULTS

Gradient boosted decision trees achieved the best discrimination in the overall model. The model including all data mildly outperformed the second stage model (AUROC 0.979, 95% CI 0.971-0.986 vs AUROC 0.955, 95% CI 0.939-0.970). Optimal model accuracy was 98.1% with a sensitivity of 0.763 for positive prediction of postpartum hemorrhage. The second stage model achieved an accuracy of 98.0% with a sensitivity of 0.737. Other selected algorithms returned models that performed with decreased discrimination. Models stratified by mode of delivery achieved good to excellent discrimination but lacked the sensitivity necessary for clinical applicability.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning methods can be used to identify women at risk for postpartum hemorrhage who may benefit from individualized preventative measures. Models limited to data available prior to delivery perform nearly as well as those with more complete data sets, supporting their potential utility in the clinical setting. Further work is necessary to create successful models based upon mode of delivery and to validate the findings of this study. An unbiased approach to hemorrhage risk prediction may be superior to human risk assessment and represents an area for future research.

摘要

背景

产后出血仍然是美国产妇发病率和死亡率的最大原因之一。

目的

本文旨在使用机器学习技术来识别产科分娩时产后出血风险患者。

方法

对 2013 年 7 月至 2018 年 10 月在一家主要学术中心分娩的 18 至 55 岁的妇女进行了分析(n=30867)。从电子病历中收集了 497 个变量,包括以下内容:人口统计学信息;产科、医疗、外科和家族史;生命体征;实验室结果;分娩药物暴露;和分娩结果。产后出血定义为分娩时出血量≥1000ml,无论分娩方式如何,观察到 2179 例(7.1%)阳性病例。使用回归、树和核机器学习方法进行有监督学习,基于训练(21606/30867,70%)和验证(4630/30867,15%)队列创建分类模型。使用特征选择算法和领域知识对模型进行调优。使用独立的测试队列(4631/30867,15%)通过评估准确性、接收器操作曲线下面积(AUROC)和产后出血正确分类的敏感性来确定最终性能。使用所有收集的数据和仅使用第二产程前或决定行剖宫产时的数据创建了单独的模型。还检查了按分娩方式的模型。

结果

梯度提升决策树在整体模型中实现了最佳区分度。包括所有数据的模型略优于第二阶段模型(AUROC 0.979,95%CI 0.971-0.986 vs AUROC 0.955,95%CI 0.939-0.970)。最佳模型的准确性为 98.1%,阳性预测产后出血的敏感性为 0.763。第二阶段模型的准确率为 98.0%,敏感性为 0.737。其他选定的算法返回的模型区分度降低。按分娩方式分层的模型实现了良好到优秀的区分度,但缺乏临床应用所需的敏感性。

结论

机器学习方法可用于识别产后出血风险妇女,她们可能受益于个体化预防措施。仅使用分娩前可用的数据的模型几乎与具有更完整数据集的模型一样有效,支持其在临床环境中的潜在效用。进一步的工作是必要的,以创建基于分娩方式的成功模型,并验证本研究的结果。基于无偏风险预测方法可能优于人为风险评估,是未来研究的一个领域。