• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产术后前置胎盘产后出血的可解释机器学习预测模型的开发与验证:一项多中心研究

Development and Validation of An Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Placenta Previa Following Cesarean Section: A Multicenter Study.

作者信息

Li Mianmian, Su Xinhui, Liao Wenxin, Huang Li, Yang Yihong, Wu Xizi, Fan Yao, Liu Jing, Yang Xin, Zeng Zhen, Ding Wencheng, Zeng Wanjiang, Xu Xiaoyan

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.

出版信息

Reprod Sci. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s43032-025-01937-0.

DOI:10.1007/s43032-025-01937-0
PMID:40797059
Abstract

The objective of this study is to predict the occurrence of postpartum hemorrhage in women with placenta previa based on machine learning. This retrospective study enrolled 845 singleton pregnant patients with placenta previa from two hospitals. They were allocated into a training cohort (n = 403), a testing cohort (n = 174), and the external validation cohort (n = 268). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were employed to select clinical variables (p < 0.05), which were subsequently utilized to develop 11 machine learning prediction models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), and specificity (SPE) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. Besides, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to interpret the role and effectiveness of variables in the predictive model. Three machine learning models with the best predictive performance were combined into a Prediction Ensemble Classifier through voting. The Gradient Boosting Machine demonstrated the best predictive performance. In the validation cohort, AUC of the Gradient Boosting Machine model is 0.810(95% CI 0.754-0.865), ACC was 0.765(95% CI 0.716-0.813), SEN was 0.613(95% CI 0.513-0.723), while these values of the Prediction Ensemble Classifier were 0.813(0.756-0.871), 0.806(0.757-0.854), and 0.480(0.375-0.597), respectively. The importance of SHAP variables in the model, ranked from high to low, is as follows: d-dimer, ultrasound diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum, neutrophils, prothrombin time, and platelets. The Gradient Boosting Machine model demonstrated excellent performance in predicting postpartum hemorrhage in cases of placenta previa. Furthermore, SHAP analysis enabled interpretation of the variables in the model.

摘要

本研究的目的是基于机器学习预测前置胎盘孕妇产后出血的发生情况。这项回顾性研究纳入了来自两家医院的845名单胎前置胎盘孕妇。她们被分为训练队列(n = 403)、测试队列(n = 174)和外部验证队列(n = 268)。采用单因素和多因素回归分析来选择临床变量(p < 0.05),随后利用这些变量开发11种机器学习预测模型。采用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、决策曲线分析(DCA)、准确率(ACC)、灵敏度(SEN)和特异度(SPE)来评估模型的性能。此外,使用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)来解释变量在预测模型中的作用和有效性。通过投票将三个预测性能最佳的机器学习模型组合成一个预测集成分类器。梯度提升机表现出最佳的预测性能。在验证队列中,梯度提升机模型的AUC为0.810(95%CI 0.754 - 0.865),ACC为0.765(95%CI 0.716 - 0.813),SEN为0.613(95%CI 0.513 - 0.723),而预测集成分类器的这些值分别为0.813(0.756 - 0.871)、0.806(0.757 - 0.854)和0.480(0.375 - 0.597)。模型中SHAP变量的重要性从高到低依次为:D - 二聚体、胎盘植入谱系超声诊断、中性粒细胞、凝血酶原时间和血小板。梯度提升机模型在预测前置胎盘病例的产后出血方面表现出优异的性能。此外,SHAP分析能够解释模型中的变量。

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of An Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Placenta Previa Following Cesarean Section: A Multicenter Study.剖宫产术后前置胎盘产后出血的可解释机器学习预测模型的开发与验证:一项多中心研究
Reprod Sci. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s43032-025-01937-0.
2
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
3
Interpretable prediction of hospital mortality in bleeding critically ill patients based on machine learning and SHAP.基于机器学习和SHAP对出血性危重症患者医院死亡率的可解释预测
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 15;25(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03101-9.
4
Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications after lung cancer surgery: a machine learning study.用于预测肺癌手术后肺部并发症的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证:一项机器学习研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Aug 1;86:103386. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103386. eCollection 2025 Aug.
5
Development and validation of a machine learning-based clinical prediction model for monitoring liver injury in patients with pan-cancer receiving immunotherapy.基于机器学习的临床预测模型的开发与验证,用于监测接受免疫治疗的泛癌患者的肝损伤
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Jul 5;203:106036. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106036.
6
Construction and validation of HBV-ACLF bacterial infection diagnosis model based on machine learning.基于机器学习的HBV-ACLF细菌感染诊断模型的构建与验证
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):847. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11199-5.
7
Development and validation of a model to preoperatively predict the risk of placenta accreta spectrum in women with placenta previa.一种用于术前预测前置胎盘女性胎盘植入谱系疾病风险的模型的开发与验证
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2025 Jul;34(7):1145-1153. doi: 10.17219/acem/191828.
8
A web-based prediction model for brain metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer patients.一种用于非小细胞肺癌患者脑转移的基于网络的预测模型。
Discov Oncol. 2025 Jul 29;16(1):1438. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-03298-1.
9
Prediction of Insulin Resistance in Nondiabetic Population Using LightGBM and Cohort Validation of Its Clinical Value: Cross-Sectional and Retrospective Cohort Study.使用LightGBM预测非糖尿病人群的胰岛素抵抗及其临床价值的队列验证:横断面和回顾性队列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 13;13:e72238. doi: 10.2196/72238.
10
Development and validation of a machine learning-based risk prediction model for stroke-associated pneumonia in older adult hemorrhagic stroke.老年出血性卒中患者卒中相关性肺炎的基于机器学习的风险预测模型的开发与验证
Front Neurol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1591570. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1591570. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning and SHAP value interpretation for predicting comorbidity of cardiovascular disease and cancer with dietary antioxidants.用于预测心血管疾病和癌症与膳食抗氧化剂合并症的机器学习及SHAP值解释
Redox Biol. 2025 Feb;79:103470. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2024.103470. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
2
Risk of intraoperative hemorrhage during cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy surgery: development and validation of an interpretable machine learning prediction model.剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠手术中术中出血的风险:一种可解释的机器学习预测模型的开发与验证
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Nov 29;78:102969. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102969. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Development of a Novel Nomogram Based on Ultrasonic Radiomics for Predicting Intrauterine Pregnancy After Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycle.
基于超声影像组学的新型列线图在预测冻融胚胎移植周期宫内妊娠中的应用
J Ultrasound Med. 2025 Apr;44(4):655-666. doi: 10.1002/jum.16625. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
4
Construction of machine learning diagnostic models for cardiovascular pan-disease based on blood routine and biochemical detection data.基于血常规和生化检测数据构建心血管多病种的机器学习诊断模型。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Sep 28;23(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02439-0.
5
Developing clinical prediction models: a step-by-step guide.临床预测模型的建立:分步指南。
BMJ. 2024 Sep 3;386:e078276. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078276.
6
Quantitative prediction of postpartum hemorrhage in cesarean section on machine learning.机器学习在剖宫产术中产后出血的定量预测。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02571-7.
7
Prediction model of pressure injury occurrence in diabetic patients during ICU hospitalization--XGBoost machine learning model can be interpreted based on SHAP.基于 SHAP 的 XGBoost 机器学习模型可用于预测 ICU 住院糖尿病患者压疮发生情况的预测模型。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2024 Aug;83:103715. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103715. Epub 2024 May 2.
8
Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation.临床预测模型的评估(第 1 部分):从建立到外部验证。
BMJ. 2024 Jan 8;384:e074819. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-074819.
9
A multimodal deep learning model for predicting severe hemorrhage in placenta previa.一种用于预测前置胎盘严重出血的多模态深度学习模型。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 13;13(1):17320. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44634-1.
10
Gestation of delivery in people with antepartum hemorrhage and placenta previa.前置胎盘及产前出血患者的分娩孕周。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Dec;5(12):101191. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101191. Epub 2023 Oct 12.