• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

近视中波前优化与角膜波前引导的经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术治疗高阶像差(>0.35μm)的比较。

Comparison of wavefront-optimized and corneal wavefront-guided transPRK for high-order aberrations (>0.35 μm) in myopia.

作者信息

Shao Ting, Li Hua, Zhang Jiafan, Wang Huifeng, Liu Sai, Long Keli

机构信息

From the Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Dec 1;48(12):1413-1418. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001012.

DOI:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001012
PMID:35849545
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes, mainly including contrast sensitivity and high-order aberrations (HOAs), between wavefront-optimized (WFO) and corneal wavefront-guided (CWFG) transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transPRK) for preoperative HOAs >0.35 μm.

SETTING

Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled study.

METHODS

71 patients with preoperative total ocular and corneal aberrations >0.35 μm who underwent transPRK for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism were randomly divided into the aberration optimization mode group (WFO group; 36 eyes) and the corneal wavefront-guided mode group (CWFG group; 35 eyes). Preoperative and postoperative visual outcome, refraction, contrast sensitivity, and HOAs were compared.

RESULTS

71 patients (71 eyes) who underwent transPRK were selected. The CWFG group had significantly lower total HOAs and coma values in the corneal aberration compared with the WFO group at 3 ( P = .009; P < .001) and 6 months postoperatively ( P = .006; P < .001). In addition, the CWFG group had significantly lower total HOAs and coma values in the whole-eye aberration compared with the WFO group at 3 ( P = .044; P = .004) and 6 months postoperatively ( P = .026; P = .001). The CWFG group had significantly better improvement in contrast sensitivity than the WFO group at spatial frequencies of 3 cycles per degree (cpd), 6 cpd, 12 cpd, and 18 cpd ( P = .005, P = .007, P = .001, and P < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

CWFG transPRK is associated with better visual and refractive outcomes and less HOAs than WFO transPRK in eyes with preoperative aberrations >0.35 μm.

摘要

目的

比较波前优化(WFO)和角膜波前引导(CWFG)经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术(transPRK)治疗术前高阶像差(HOAs)>0.35μm时的临床结果,主要包括对比敏感度和高阶像差。

设置

中国山东青岛山东第一医科大学附属青岛眼科医院。

设计

前瞻性随机对照研究。

方法

71例术前全眼和角膜像差>0.35μm、接受transPRK治疗近视和近视散光的患者被随机分为像差优化模式组(WFO组;36眼)和角膜波前引导模式组(CWFG组;35眼)。比较术前和术后的视力、屈光、对比敏感度和高阶像差。

结果

选取71例接受transPRK的患者(71眼)。术后3个月(P = 0.009;P < 0.001)和6个月时(P = 0.006;P < 0.001),CWFG组角膜像差的总高阶像差和彗差值显著低于WFO组。此外,术后3个月(P = 0.044;P = 0.004)和6个月时(P = 0.026;P = 0.001),CWFG组全眼像差的总高阶像差和彗差值显著低于WFO组。在每度3周/循环(cpd)、6 cpd、12 cpd和18 cpd的空间频率下,CWFG组的对比敏感度改善显著优于WFO组(分别为P = 0.005、P = 0.007、P = 0.001和P < 0.001)。

结论

对于术前像差>0.35μm的眼睛,CWFG transPRK比WFO transPRK具有更好的视觉和屈光效果,且高阶像差更少。

相似文献

1
Comparison of wavefront-optimized and corneal wavefront-guided transPRK for high-order aberrations (>0.35 μm) in myopia.近视中波前优化与角膜波前引导的经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术治疗高阶像差(>0.35μm)的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Dec 1;48(12):1413-1418. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001012.
2
Comparison between Wavefront-optimized and corneal Wavefront-guided Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in moderate to high astigmatism.波前优化与角膜波前引导的经上皮屈光性角膜切削术治疗中高度散光的比较
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun 26;18(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0827-x.
3
Comparison of Outcomes after Wavefront-optimized and Topography-guided Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy.波前像差引导的经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术与角膜地形引导的经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术术后效果比较。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug;38(4):275-283. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2024.0027. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
4
Comparison of Corneal Wavefront-optimized and Wavefront-guided Alcohol-assisted Photorefractive Keratectomy Using Schwind Amaris 750S Laser for Myopia.使用施温德阿玛里斯750S激光进行角膜波前优化与波前引导的酒精辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视的比较。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;34(3):210-218. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2019.0087.
5
Contralateral eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy: a randomized clinical trial.波前引导与波前优化的光折射性角膜切削术的双眼对照研究:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;133(1):51-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.3876.
6
Comparing corneal higher-order aberrations in corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus small-incision lenticule extraction.比较角膜波前引导经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术与小切口微透镜取出术对角膜高阶像差的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Jun;44(6):725-733. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.03.028. Epub 2018 May 19.
7
One-Year Outcomes From a Prospective, Randomized, Eye-to-Eye Comparison of Wavefront-Guided and Wavefront-Optimized PRK in Myopia.一项前瞻性、随机、眼对眼比较的近视患者波前引导和波前优化 PRK 的一年结果。
J Refract Surg. 2020 Mar 1;36(3):160-168. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20200129-01.
8
Outcomes Comparison Between Wavefront-Optimized and Topography-Guided PRK in Contralateral Eyes With Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.双眼近视伴近视散光患者行波前像差优化与地形图引导 PRK 的疗效比较。
J Refract Surg. 2020 Jun 1;36(6):358-365. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20200416-01.
9
Comparison of Objective Visual Quality Following SMILE and SmartPulse Technology-Assisted TransPRK at a 1,050-Hz Ablation Frequency for Moderate-to-High Myopia.在 1050Hz 消融频率下,SMILE 和 SmartPulse 技术辅助 TransPRK 治疗中高度近视的客观视觉质量比较。
J Refract Surg. 2024 Jul;40(7):e490-e498. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20240514-01. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
10
Comparison of Wavefront-Optimized Ablation and Topography-Guided Contoura Ablation With LYRA Protocol in LASIK.LASIK中波前优化消融术与采用LYRA方案的角膜地形图引导Contoura消融术的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2019 Apr 1;35(4):222-229. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190304-02.

引用本文的文献

1
Surface ablation laser surgery: Bibliometric and visualized analysis from 2004 to 2023.表面消融激光手术:2004 年至 2023 年的文献计量学和可视化分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 8;103(45):e40437. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040437.
2
Comparison of visual quality after wavefront-guided LASIK in patients with different levels of preoperative total ocular higher-order aberrations: a retrospective study.不同术前总眼高阶像差水平患者行波前引导 LASIK 术后视觉质量比较:一项回顾性研究。
PeerJ. 2024 Aug 21;12:e17940. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17940. eCollection 2024.