Suppr超能文献

基于源特定的生态和人体健康风险分析,确定华南典型冶炼矿区土壤重金属污染的优先源。

Identification priority source of soil heavy metals pollution based on source-specific ecological and human health risk analysis in a typical smelting and mining region of South China.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.

School of National Security and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

出版信息

Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022 Sep 1;242:113864. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113864. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

Abstract

An in-depth understanding of the ecological and health risks posed by heavy metals originating from various pollution sources is critical for foresighted soil-quality management. Based on 220 grid samples (2 × 2 km) analyzed for eight heavy metals (Cd, Hg, As, Pb, Cr, Ni, Cu, and Zn) in the Chenshui (CS) watershed of Hunan Province, China, we applied an integrated approach for identifying and apportioning pollution sources of soil heavy metals and exploring their source-specific pollution risks. This approach consists of three sequential steps: (1) source identification by combining the positive matrix factorization model with geostatistical analysis; (2) quantification of ecological, carcinogenic, and non-carcinogenic risks in a source-specific manner; (3) prioritization of sources in a holistic manner, considering both ecological risks and human health risks. Cd (68.0%) and Hg (13.3%) dominated the ecological risk in terms of ecological risk index; As dominated the non-carcinogenic health risk in terms of total hazard index (THI; adults: 84.8%, children: 84.7%) and the carcinogenic health risk in terms of total carcinogenic risk index (TCRI; adults: 69.0%, children: 68.8%). Among three exposure routes, oral ingestion (89.4-95.2%) was the predominant route for both adults and children. Compared with adults (THI = 0.41, TCRI = 7.01E-05), children (THI = 2.81, TCRI = 1.22E-04) had greater non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks. Four sources (F1-4) were identified for the CS watershed: atmospheric deposition related to coal-burning and traffic emissions (F1, 18.0%), natural sources from parent materials (F2, 34.3%), non-ferrous mining and smelting industry (F3, 37.9%), and historical arsenic-related activity (F4, 9.8%). The F3 source contributed the largest (45.2%) to the ecological risks, and the F4 source was the predominant contributor to non-carcinogenic (52.4%) and carcinogenic (64.6%) risks. The results highlight the importance of considering legacy As pollution from abandoned industries when developing risk reduction strategies in this region. The proposed methodology for source and risk identification and apportionment formulates the multidimensional concerns of pollution and the various associated risks into a tangible decision-making process to support soil pollution control.

摘要

深入了解源自各种污染源的重金属对生态和健康的风险,对于有远见的土壤质量管理至关重要。本研究基于中国湖南省潮水(CS)流域内 220 个网格样本(2×2km)中 8 种重金属(Cd、Hg、As、Pb、Cr、Ni、Cu 和 Zn)的分析,采用综合方法识别和分配土壤重金属污染源,并探索其特定污染源的污染风险。该方法包括三个连续步骤:(1) 结合正矩阵因子模型和地质统计学分析进行源识别;(2) 以特定源的方式量化生态、致癌和非致癌风险;(3) 综合考虑生态风险和人类健康风险,对来源进行优先级排序。Cd(68.0%)和 Hg(13.3%)在生态风险指数方面主导着生态风险;As 在总危害指数(THI;成人:84.8%,儿童:84.7%)方面主导着非致癌健康风险,在总致癌风险指数(TCRI;成人:69.0%,儿童:68.8%)方面主导着致癌健康风险。在三种暴露途径中,口服摄入(89.4-95.2%)是成人和儿童的主要途径。与成人(THI=0.41,TCRI=7.01E-05)相比,儿童(THI=2.81,TCRI=1.22E-04)具有更大的非致癌和致癌风险。CS 流域确定了四个污染源(F1-4):与燃煤和交通排放有关的大气沉降(F1,18.0%)、源自母质的自然源(F2,34.3%)、有色采矿和冶炼工业(F3,37.9%)和历史砷相关活动(F4,9.8%)。F3 源对生态风险的贡献最大(45.2%),而 F4 源是对非致癌(52.4%)和致癌(64.6%)风险的主要贡献者。研究结果强调,在制定该地区风险缓解策略时,需要考虑废弃产业遗留的砷污染。所提出的源和风险识别与分配方法将污染的多维问题和各种相关风险纳入有形的决策过程中,以支持土壤污染控制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验