Servizio Immunotrasfusionale, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Umbria 2, Foligno (PG), Italy
Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 18;12(7):e056370. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056370.
Dynamics of antibody responses following SARS-CoV-2 infection are controversial in terms of immunity and persistence. We aimed to assess longitudinally the trend of antibody serological titres, their correlation with clinical severity as well as clinical reinfection during a follow-up.
Longitudinal cohort, 12 months follow-up study.
USL Umbria 2.
Consecutive subjects aged 15-75 who were discharged with the diagnosis of Sars-Cov-2 from the hospitals of the AUSL Umbria 2, or resulted positive to a PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 infection with or without symptoms were recruited. SARS-CoV-2 serological testing for antibodies targeting the Nucleocapside and Spike proteins were determined.
Of 184 eligible subjects, 149 were available for evaluation: 17 were classified as oligo/asymptomatic, 107 as symptomatic, 25 as hospital admitted. Participants differed in terms of signs and symptoms as well as treatment. Overall there was a significant difference in terms of antibody titres between groups (anti-S: p<0.00; anti-N: p=0.019). Median anti-S titres in the symptomatic and hospital admitted participants were significantly higher compared with the oligo/asymptomatic participants. During follow-up, the median titre of anti-S antibodies did not show significant variations (p=0.500) and the difference within groups remained constant overtime. Subjects that showed an anti-S titre above the threshold of 12 U/mL were 88.7% at first visit and 88.2% at last follow-up. Anti-N values were higher in the hospital admitted participants compared with the other two groups. Anti-N titre reduced constantly overtime (p<0.001) and across the three groups of participants. The percentage of the subjects with serological titre above threshold (<1.4 U/mL) decreased from 74.5%% to 29.2% (p<0.001). None of the participants developed clinically evident reinfection.
Anti-N and anti-S correlate well with clinical severity. While anti-N declines overtime, anti-S antibodies persist for at least 1 year.
关于新冠病毒感染后的抗体反应的动力学,在免疫和持久性方面存在争议。我们旨在评估抗体血清学滴度的纵向趋势,及其与临床严重程度的相关性,以及在随访期间的临床再感染情况。
纵向队列,12 个月随访研究。
意大利翁布里亚 2 区卫生服务局。
连续招募了从翁布里亚 2 区 AUSL 医院出院的年龄在 15-75 岁之间、被诊断为 SARS-CoV-2 的患者,或经 PCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染呈阳性且有或无症状的患者。检测了针对核衣壳和刺突蛋白的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体。
184 名符合条件的患者中,149 名可进行评估:17 名患者被归类为轻症/无症状,107 名患者为有症状,25 名患者住院。参与者在症状和体征以及治疗方面存在差异。总体而言,各组之间的抗体滴度存在显著差异(抗-S:p<0.00;抗-N:p=0.019)。有症状和住院的参与者的抗-S 滴度中位数明显高于轻症/无症状的参与者。在随访期间,抗-S 抗体的中位数滴度没有显著变化(p=0.500),且组内差异随时间保持不变。首次就诊时,抗-S 抗体滴度高于 12 U/mL 的患者比例为 88.7%,末次随访时为 88.2%。与其他两组相比,住院患者的抗-N 值更高。抗-N 滴度随时间不断下降(p<0.001),且在三组参与者中均如此。血清学滴度高于阈值(<1.4 U/mL)的患者比例从 74.5%降至 29.2%(p<0.001)。无任何患者发生临床明显的再感染。
抗-N 和抗-S 与临床严重程度密切相关。虽然抗-N 随时间下降,但抗-S 抗体至少持续 1 年。