Department of Biostatistics, Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Heath, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2022 Jul;25 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e25917. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25917.
Pregnant women are routinely excluded from clinical trials, leading to the absence or delay in even the most basic pharmacokinetic (PK) information needed for dosing in pregnancy. When available, pregnancy PK studies use a small sample size, resulting in limited safety information. We discuss key study design elements that may enhance the timely availability of pregnancy data, including the role and timing of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate pregnancy safety; efficacy and safety outcome measures; stand-alone protocols, platform trials, single arm studies, sample size and the effect that follow-up time during gestation has on analysis interpretations; and observational studies.
Pregnancy PK should be studied during drug development, after dosing in non-pregnant persons is established (unless non-clinical or other data raise pregnancy concerns). RCTs should evaluate the safety during pregnancy of priority new HIV agents that are likely to be used by large numbers of females of childbearing age. Key endpoints for pregnancy safety studies include birth outcomes (prematurity, small for gestational age and stillbirth) and neonatal death, with traditional adverse events and infant growth also measured (congenital anomalies are best studied through surveillance). We recommend that viral efficacy be studied as a secondary endpoint of pregnancy RCTs, once PK studies confirm adequate drug exposure in pregnancy. RCTs typically use a stand-alone protocol for new agents. In contrast, master protocols using a platform design can add agents over time, possibly speeding safety data ascertainment. To speed accrual, stand-alone pregnancy trial protocols can include pre-specified starting rules based upon adequate PK levels in pregnancy; and seamless master protocols or platform trials can include a pregnancy PK and safety component. When RCTs are unethical or cost-prohibitive, observational studies should be conducted, preferably using target trial emulation to avoid bias.
Pregnancy PK needs to be obtained earlier in drug evaluation. Timely RCTs are needed to understand safety in pregnancy for high-priority new HIV agents. RCTs that enrol pregnant women should focus on outcomes unique to pregnancy, and observational studies should focus on questions that RCTs are not equipped to answer.
孕妇通常被排除在临床试验之外,导致即使是最基本的用于孕妇给药的药代动力学(PK)信息也缺失或延迟。当有可用的妊娠 PK 研究时,样本量较小,导致安全性信息有限。我们讨论了可能增强妊娠数据及时性的关键研究设计要素,包括随机对照试验(RCT)在评估妊娠安全性方面的作用和时机;疗效和安全性结果测量;独立方案、平台试验、单臂研究、样本量以及妊娠期间随访时间对分析解释的影响;以及观察性研究。
妊娠 PK 应在药物开发期间进行研究,在确定非孕妇给药剂量后(除非非临床或其他数据引起妊娠担忧)。RCT 应评估可能被大量育龄妇女使用的新 HIV 药物优先药物在妊娠期间的安全性。妊娠安全性研究的关键终点包括出生结局(早产、小于胎龄儿和死产)和新生儿死亡,同时还测量传统不良事件和婴儿生长(先天畸形最好通过监测进行研究)。我们建议一旦 PK 研究证实妊娠期间有足够的药物暴露,就将病毒疗效作为妊娠 RCT 的次要终点进行研究。RCT 通常为新药物使用独立方案。相比之下,使用平台设计的主方案可以随时间添加药物,从而可能加快安全性数据的确定。为了加快入组速度,独立妊娠试验方案可以包括基于妊娠期间足够 PK 水平的预设起始规则;无缝主方案或平台试验可以包括妊娠 PK 和安全性部分。当 RCT 不道德或成本过高时,应进行观察性研究,最好使用目标试验模拟以避免偏倚。
在药物评估中需要更早获得妊娠 PK。需要及时进行 RCT,以了解高优先级新 HIV 药物在妊娠中的安全性。纳入孕妇的 RCT 应专注于妊娠特有的结局,而观察性研究应专注于 RCT 无法回答的问题。