Department of Biology, California State University Northridge, Northridge, California, USA.
Space Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA.
mSystems. 2022 Aug 30;7(4):e0141921. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01419-21. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are widespread in drylands and deserts. At the microhabitat scale, they also host hypolithic communities that live under semitranslucent stones. Both environmental niches experience exposure to extreme conditions such as high UV radiation, desiccation, temperature fluctuations, and resource limitation. However, hypolithic communities are somewhat protected from extremes relative to biocrust communities. Conditions are otherwise similar, so comparing them can answer outstanding questions regarding adaptations to environmental extremes. Using metagenomic sequencing, we assessed the functional potential of dryland soil communities and identified the functional underpinnings of ecological niche differentiation in biocrusts versus hypoliths. We also determined the effect of the anchoring photoautotroph (moss or cyanobacteria). Genes and pathways differing in abundance between biocrusts and hypoliths indicate that biocrust communities adapt to the higher levels of UV radiation, desiccation, and temperature extremes through an increased ability to repair damaged DNA, sense and respond to environmental stimuli, and interact with other community members and the environment. Intracellular competition appears to be crucial to both communities, with biocrust communities using the Type VI Secretion System (T6SS) and hypoliths favoring a diversity of antibiotics. The dominant primary producer had a reduced effect on community functional potential compared with niche, but an abundance of genes related to monosaccharide, amino acid, and osmoprotectant uptake in moss-dominated communities indicates reliance on resources provided to heterotrophs by mosses. Our findings indicate that functional traits in dryland communities are driven by adaptations to extremes and we identify strategies that likely enable survival in dryland ecosystems. Biocrusts serve as a keystone element of desert and dryland ecosystems, stabilizing soils, retaining moisture, and serving as a carbon and nitrogen source in oligotrophic environments. Biocrusts cover approximately 12% of the Earth's terrestrial surface but are threatened by climate change and anthropogenic disturbance. Given their keystone role in ecosystem functioning, loss will have wide-spread consequences. Biocrust microbial constituents must withstand polyextreme environmental conditions including high UV exposure, desiccation, oligotrophic conditions, and temperature fluctuations over short time scales. By comparing biocrust communities with co-occurring hypolithic communities (which inhabit the ventral sides of semitranslucent stones and are buffered from environmental extremes), we identified traits that are likely key adaptations to extreme conditions. These include DNA damage repair, environmental sensing and response, and intracellular competition. Comparison of the two niches, which differ primarily in exposure levels to extreme conditions, makes this system ideal for understanding how functional traits are structured by the environment.
生物土壤结皮(biocrusts)广泛分布于干旱和沙漠地区。在微观生境尺度上,它们还为生活在半透明石头下面的附石群落提供了栖息地。这两个生态位都经历着极端条件的暴露,如高强度紫外线辐射、干燥、温度波动和资源限制。然而,与生物结皮群落相比,附石群落受到的极端条件影响较小。条件大致相似,因此对它们进行比较可以回答关于适应环境极端条件的悬而未决的问题。通过宏基因组测序,我们评估了旱地土壤群落的功能潜力,并确定了生物结皮与附石之间生态位分化的功能基础。我们还确定了锚定光合自养生物(苔藓或蓝细菌)的影响。生物结皮和附石之间丰度差异的基因和途径表明,生物结皮群落通过增强修复受损 DNA、感知和响应环境刺激以及与其他群落成员和环境相互作用的能力来适应更高水平的紫外线辐射、干燥和温度极端条件。细胞内竞争似乎对两个群落都至关重要,生物结皮群落使用 VI 型分泌系统(T6SS),而附石群落则倾向于多种抗生素。优势初级生产者对群落功能潜力的影响相对于生态位来说较小,但在以苔藓为主的群落中,与单糖、氨基酸和渗透保护剂吸收相关的基因丰富度表明,它们依赖于苔藓为异养生物提供的资源。我们的研究结果表明,旱地群落的功能特征是由对极端条件的适应驱动的,我们确定了可能使它们在旱地生态系统中得以生存的策略。生物结皮是沙漠和干旱地区生态系统的基石,它们可以稳定土壤、保持水分,并在贫营养环境中充当碳氮源。生物结皮覆盖了地球陆地表面的约 12%,但受到气候变化和人为干扰的威胁。鉴于它们在生态系统功能中的关键作用,其损失将产生广泛的影响。生物结皮微生物组成必须经受高强度紫外线辐射、干燥、贫营养条件和短时间尺度温度波动等多极端环境条件的考验。通过将生物结皮群落与共存的附石群落(栖息在半透明石头的腹侧,免受环境极端条件的影响)进行比较,我们确定了可能是适应极端条件的关键特征。这些特征包括 DNA 损伤修复、环境感应和响应以及细胞内竞争。这两个生态位的比较主要是基于对极端条件暴露程度的差异,这使得该系统非常适合理解功能特征是如何由环境构建的。