Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna and General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Institute of Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Maximiliansplatz 2, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2022 Oct;32(10):6557-6564. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09015-8. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
Due to its high sensitivity, DCE MRI of the breast (MRIb) is increasingly used for both screening and assessment purposes. The Kaiser score (KS) is a clinical decision algorithm, which formalizes and guides diagnosis in breast MRI and is expected to compensate for lesser reader experience. The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of untrained residents using the KS compared to off-site radiologists experienced in breast imaging using only MR BI-RADS.
Three off-site, board-certified radiologists, experienced in breast imaging, interpreted MRIb according to the MR BI-RADS scale. The same studies were read by three residents in radiology without prior training in breast imaging using the KS. All readers were blinded to clinical information. Histology was used as the gold standard. Statistical analysis was conducted by comparing the AUC of the ROC curves.
A total of 80 women (median age 52 years) with 93 lesions (32 benign, 61 malignant) were included. The individual within-group performance of the three expert readers (AUC 0.723-0.742) as well as the three residents was equal (AUC 0.842-0.928), p > 0.05, respectively. But, the rating of each resident using the KS significantly outperformed the experts' ratings using the MR BI-RADS scale (p ≤ 0.05).
The KS helped residents to achieve better results in reaching correct diagnoses than experienced radiologists empirically assigning MR BI-RADS categories in a clinical "problem solving MRI" setting. These results support that reporting breast MRI benefits more from using a diagnostic algorithm rather than expert experience.
• Reporting breast MRI benefits more from using a diagnostic algorithm rather than expert experience in a clinical "problem solving MRI" setting. • The Kaiser score, which provides a clinical decision algorithm for structured reporting, helps residents to reach an expert level in breast MRI reporting and to even outperform experienced radiologists using MR BI-RADS without further formal guidance.
由于其高灵敏度,乳腺 DCE MRI(MRIb)越来越多地用于筛查和评估目的。Kaiser 评分(KS)是一种临床决策算法,它使乳腺 MRI 的诊断规范化并提供指导,且有望弥补读者经验的不足。本研究旨在评估未经培训的住院医师使用 KS 进行诊断的表现,并与仅使用 MR BI-RADS 进行乳腺成像的远程放射科医生进行比较。
3 位远程、经过委员会认证的放射科医生,具有丰富的乳腺成像经验,按照 MR BI-RADS 量表解读 MRIb。同一份研究由 3 位未接受过乳腺成像培训的放射科住院医师使用 KS 进行阅读。所有读者均对临床信息不知情。以组织学为金标准。通过比较 ROC 曲线的 AUC 进行统计学分析。
共纳入 80 名女性(中位年龄 52 岁)和 93 个病灶(32 个良性,61 个恶性)。3 位专家读者(AUC 0.723-0.742)和 3 位住院医师的组内个体表现相当(AUC 0.842-0.928),p>0.05。但是,每位住院医师使用 KS 进行评分的结果明显优于专家使用 MR BI-RADS 量表进行评分的结果(p≤0.05)。
在临床“解决问题的 MRI”环境中,KS 有助于住院医师做出正确诊断,比经验丰富的放射科医生凭经验分配 MR BI-RADS 类别效果更好。这些结果支持在报告乳腺 MRI 时,使用诊断算法比使用专家经验获益更多。
在临床“解决问题的 MRI”环境中,报告乳腺 MRI 时,使用诊断算法比使用专家经验获益更多。
Kaiser 评分(KS)为结构化报告提供了一种临床决策算法,有助于住院医师在乳腺 MRI 报告方面达到专家水平,甚至在没有进一步正式指导的情况下,也能超过使用 MR BI-RADS 的有经验的放射科医生。