• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于红外热质量筛查中预测核心体温的回归模型。

Regression model for predicting core body temperature in infrared thermal mass screening.

作者信息

Limpabandhu Chayabhan, Hooper Frances Sophie Woodley, Li Rui, Tse Zion

机构信息

Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS.

Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, Brooklyn, USA.

出版信息

IPEM Transl. 2022 Nov-Dec;3:100006. doi: 10.1016/j.ipemt.2022.100006. Epub 2022 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.ipemt.2022.100006
PMID:35854880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9284542/
Abstract

With fever being one of the most prominent symptoms of COVID-19, the implementation of fever screening has become commonplace around the world to help mitigate the spread of the virus. Non-contact methods of temperature screening, such as infrared (IR) forehead thermometers and thermal cameras, benefit by minimizing infection risk. However, the IR temperature measurements may not be reliably correlated with actual core body temperatures. This study proposed a trained model prediction using IR-measured facial feature temperatures to predict core body temperatures comparable to an FDA-approved product. The reference core body temperatures were measured by a commercially available temperature monitoring system. Optimal inputs and training models were selected by the correlation between predicted and reference core body temperature. Five regression models were tested during the study. The linear regression model showed the lowest minimum-root-mean-square error (RSME) compared with reference temperatures. The temple and nose region of interest (ROI) were identified as optimal inputs. This study suggests that IR temperature data could provide comparatively accurate core body temperature prediction for rapid mass screening of potential COVID cases using the linear regression model. Using linear regression modeling, the non-contact temperature measurement could be comparable to the SpotOn system with a mean SD of ± 0.285 °C and MAE of 0.240 °C.

摘要

发热是新冠病毒肺炎(COVID-19)最显著的症状之一,实施发热筛查已在全球变得司空见惯,以帮助减轻病毒传播。非接触式体温筛查方法,如红外(IR)额头温度计和热成像摄像机,通过将感染风险降至最低而具有优势。然而,红外温度测量可能与实际核心体温没有可靠的相关性。本研究提出了一种经过训练的模型预测方法,利用红外测量的面部特征温度来预测与美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的产品相当的核心体温。参考核心体温由市售温度监测系统测量。通过预测核心体温与参考核心体温之间的相关性选择最佳输入和训练模型。研究期间测试了五个回归模型。与参考温度相比,线性回归模型显示出最低的最小均方根误差(RSME)。颞部和鼻部感兴趣区域(ROI)被确定为最佳输入。本研究表明,红外温度数据可以为使用线性回归模型对潜在新冠病例进行快速大规模筛查提供相对准确的核心体温预测。使用线性回归建模,非接触式体温测量可以与SpotOn系统相媲美,平均标准差为±0.285°C,平均绝对误差为0.240°C。

相似文献

1
Regression model for predicting core body temperature in infrared thermal mass screening.用于红外热质量筛查中预测核心体温的回归模型。
IPEM Transl. 2022 Nov-Dec;3:100006. doi: 10.1016/j.ipemt.2022.100006. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
2
Clinical accuracy of infrared temperature measurement devices: a comparison against non-invasive core-body temperature.红外测温设备的临床准确性:与非侵入性核心体温的比较。
Clin Med (Lond). 2023 Mar;23(2):157-163. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2022-0252.
3
Is thermal scanner losing its bite in mass screening of fever due to SARS?在对非典引发的发热进行大规模筛查时,热扫描仪是否正失去其效力?
Med Phys. 2005 Jan;32(1):93-7. doi: 10.1118/1.1819532.
4
Optimal diagnostic fever thresholds using non-contact infrared thermometers under COVID-19.在 COVID-19 期间使用非接触式红外体温计的最佳诊断发热阈值。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 24;10:985553. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.985553. eCollection 2022.
5
Analysis of IR thermal imager for mass blind fever screening.用于大规模盲测发热筛查的红外热成像仪分析
Microvasc Res. 2004 Sep;68(2):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2004.05.003.
6
Utility of infrared thermography for screening febrile subjects.红外热成像技术在发热患者筛查中的应用。
Hong Kong Med J. 2013 Apr;19(2):109-15.
7
Comparison of Temperature Readings, Infrared, Non-Contact Thermometer with Contact Digital Thermometer Readings in Children.比较儿童的红外非接触式体温计读数与接触式数字体温计读数。
West Afr J Med. 2021 Sep 30;38(9):851-858.
8
Rectal and Bladder Temperatures vs Forehead Core Temperatures Measured With SpotOn Monitoring System.直肠和膀胱温度与 SpotOn 监测系统测量的额核心温度。
Am J Crit Care. 2018 Jan;27(1):43-50. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2018865.
9
Investigation of the Impact of Infrared Sensors on Core Body Temperature Monitoring by Comparing Measurement Sites.探讨比较测量部位对红外传感器核心体温监测影响
Sensors (Basel). 2020 May 19;20(10):2885. doi: 10.3390/s20102885.
10
Forehead, Temple and Wrist Temperature Assessment of Ethnic Groups using Infrared Technology.额头、太阳穴和手腕温度评估的族群使用红外线技术。
Med Eng Phys. 2022 Apr;102:103777. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103777. Epub 2022 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of Post-Bath Body Temperature Using Fuzzy Inference Systems with Hydrotherapy Data.利用水疗数据的模糊推理系统预测沐浴后体温
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 23;13(9):972. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13090972.
2
Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers and Thermal Scanners for Human Body Temperature Monitoring: A Systematic Review.非接触式红外体温计和热扫描仪在人体体温监测中的应用:系统评价。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 26;23(17):7439. doi: 10.3390/s23177439.
3
Special issue-Sharing of best practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating the extent of asymptomatic COVID-19 and its potential for community transmission: Systematic review and meta-analysis.评估无症状新冠病毒感染的程度及其社区传播潜力:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2020 Dec 31;5(4):223-234. doi: 10.3138/jammi-2020-0030. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Influence of ambient temperature changes on intraoral scanning accuracy.环境温度变化对口腔内扫描准确性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Nov;130(5):755-760. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
3
Comparative Analysis of Human Body Temperatures Measured with Noncontact and Contact Thermometers.
特刊——应对新冠疫情最佳实践分享
IPEM Transl. 2022 Nov-Dec;3:100014. doi: 10.1016/j.ipemt.2022.100014. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
非接触式温度计与接触式温度计所测人体体温的对比分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 9;10(2):331. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020331.
4
Infrared Thermography for Measuring Elevated Body Temperature: Clinical Accuracy, Calibration, and Evaluation.红外热成像技术测量体温升高:临床准确性、校准和评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Dec 29;22(1):215. doi: 10.3390/s22010215.
5
Review of the efficacy of infrared thermography for screening infectious diseases with applications to COVID-19.红外热成像技术用于筛查传染病及在COVID-19中的应用效果综述。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2021 Jan;8(Suppl 1):010901. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.S1.010901. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
6
Why Temperature Screening for Coronavirus Disease 2019 With Noncontact Infrared Thermometers Does Not Work.为何使用非接触式红外温度计对2019冠状病毒病进行体温筛查不起作用。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 14;8(1):ofaa603. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa603. eCollection 2021 Jan.
7
Use of non-contact infrared thermometers in rehabilitation patients: a randomized controlled study.在康复患者中使用非接触式红外体温计:一项随机对照研究。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Jan;49(1):300060520984617. doi: 10.1177/0300060520984617.
8
Noncontact Body Temperature Measurement: Uncertainty Evaluation and Screening Decision Rule to Prevent the Spread of COVID-19.非接触式体温测量:防止 COVID-19 传播的不确定性评估和筛选决策规则。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 6;21(2):346. doi: 10.3390/s21020346.
9
Covid-19 screening: are forehead temperature measurements during cold outdoor temperatures really helpful?新冠病毒筛查:在寒冷的室外环境中测量额头温度真的有帮助吗?
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2021 Apr;133(7-8):331-335. doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01754-2. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
10
Clinical evaluation of fever-screening thermography: impact of consensus guidelines and facial measurement location.发热筛查热成像的临床评估:共识指南和面部测量位置的影响。
J Biomed Opt. 2020 Sep;25(9). doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.25.9.097002.