Flegge Lindsay G
Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, 235 Wealthy St. SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49503 USA.
Ball State University Teachers College, Muncie, IN 47303 USA.
Contemp Sch Psychol. 2022 Jul 15:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s40688-022-00424-6.
This article presents the psychometric properties of the evidence-based practice (EBP) instrument (School Version), a new interdisciplinary measure for understanding and measuring EBP use that can be understood and used across the three professions who provide the most mental health services in schools. The instrument was developed based on theory, review of the literature, expert review ( = 12), pilot study ( = 20), and national study ( = 303). While the measure may have applicability for other groups of mental health providers in other settings, this study focused on the perspectives of mental health providers in schools, specifically school psychologists, school counselors, and social workers. Initial psychometric examination resulted in a 13-item, one factor model and indicated preliminary evidence for strong validity and internal reliability. No significant difference in total score among groups of mental health professionals was found, suggesting similarities of comprehension and application of EBP regardless of professional discipline. This instrument is the only one of its kind and provides a helpful first step towards common language and common goals when conceptualizing what it means for mental health providers to use best practice. Implications for school professionals and future research are offered.
本文介绍了循证实践(EBP)工具(学校版)的心理测量特性,这是一种新的跨学科测量工具,用于理解和衡量循证实践的应用情况,它能够被在学校提供心理健康服务最多的三个专业领域所理解和使用。该工具是基于理论、文献综述、专家评审(n = 12)、预试验研究(n = 20)以及全国性研究(n = 303)而开发的。虽然该测量工具可能适用于其他环境中的其他心理健康服务提供者群体,但本研究聚焦于学校心理健康服务提供者的观点,特别是学校心理学家、学校辅导员和社会工作者。初步的心理测量检验得出了一个包含13个条目的单因素模型,并表明了该模型具有较强效度和内部信度的初步证据。研究发现,心理健康专业人员群体之间的总分没有显著差异,这表明无论专业领域如何,循证实践在理解和应用方面具有相似性。该工具是同类工具中的唯一一种,在概念化心理健康服务提供者采用最佳实践意味着什么时,它为实现共同语言和共同目标提供了有益的第一步。本文还为学校专业人员和未来研究提供了启示。