Belonenko G A, Sukhina N A, Aksyonov A A, Aksyonova E G
Donetsk National Medical University, Donetsk, Ukraine.
National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Eur J Breast Health. 2022 Jul 1;18(3):279-285. doi: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2022-3-7. eCollection 2022 Jul.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the capabilities of ductography (DG) to navigate stereotactic core-needle biopsy (sCNB) for localizing and differentiating intraductal benign and malignant proliferations of the breast in patients with pathological nipple discharge (PND).
Patients underwent physical, radiological, ultrasound, endoscopic and histopathological examinations.
The study included 183 patients. In 51, traditional DG was performed and in eight patients DG was performed using endoscopic mammoductoscopy (EMDS). A routine ductectomy labeled with methylene blue or propylene thread was performed in 81 patients. In 77 cases, a ductectomy was performed after double wire marking of intraductal proliferations (IDP) through the nipple and through the skin. In 26 patients, a preoperative sCNB under guidance of DG was performed. After sCNB 23/26 patients had benign IDP and three (11.5%) had invasive cancer. Breast surgery confirmed histology to be the gold standard in all patients, with the exception of 7 (26.9%) under the age of 45 years with benign IDP. These patients had watchful waiting and after 35 months of follow-up no signs of malignant growth were detected.DG was characterized by high (87.9%) sensitivity and low (33.3%) specificity. False positive rate was 25.9% and the cause was peripheral location of IDP (>3 cm from the nipple) in 57.1% and inadequate excision with leaving them outside the resection.
This initial study on sCNB under the guidance of traditional or selective DG reports promising findings. Further studies are needed to determine whether preoperative histological assessment of pathologic intraductal lesions at DG would reduce the number of open surgeries with benign histology at sCNB.
本研究旨在分析乳腺导管造影术(DG)引导立体定向真空辅助微创活检术(sCNB)对病理性乳头溢液(PND)患者乳腺导管内良性和恶性增生进行定位及鉴别的能力。
患者接受了体格检查、放射学检查、超声检查、内镜检查和组织病理学检查。
本研究纳入183例患者。其中51例行传统DG检查,8例行内镜乳腺导管造影术(EMDS)检查。81例行常规的用亚甲蓝或聚丙烯线标记的乳腺导管切除术。77例通过乳头和皮肤对导管内增生(IDP)进行双线标记后行乳腺导管切除术。26例患者在DG引导下行术前sCNB。sCNB术后,23/26例患者IDP为良性,3例(11.5%)为浸润性癌。除7例(26.9%)45岁以下IDP为良性的患者外,乳腺手术证实的组织学检查是所有患者的金标准。这些患者采用观察等待策略,35个月随访后未发现恶性生长迹象。DG的特点是灵敏度高(87.9%)、特异度低(33.3%)。假阳性率为25.9%,原因是IDP位于周边(距乳头>3 cm)占57.1%,以及切除不充分导致IDP残留于切除范围外。
这项关于传统或选择性DG引导下sCNB的初步研究报告了有前景的结果。需要进一步研究以确定DG时对病理性导管内病变进行术前组织学评估是否会减少sCNB中良性组织学结果的开放手术数量。