Simon David A, Shachar Carmel, Cohen I Glenn
Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
J Law Biosci. 2022 Jul 14;9(2):lsac015. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsac015. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
Health technology is advancing at a rapid clip, with many of these technologies appearing on consumer products like smartphones and tablets. Federal regulators have responded to these changes with a flexible approach that allows firms to manufacture a 'general wellness product' ('GWP') without being subject to regulation typically applied to 'devices' that diagnose or treat a disease or condition. Using currently available medical products and devices from across a spectrum of diseases, we describe how firms can use this existing regulatory framework to develop innovative products by 'skating the line' between mostly unregulated GWPs and regulated devices. On the one hand, we find that skating the line offers a variety of benefits, including potential improvements to product development, innovation, and patient access to medical technologies. On the other hand, we show that this technique has potential costs to patient safety, competition, and data sharing. Skating the regulatory line between GWP and devices, in other words, offers important benefits but is not without risks. Any further regulatory action to address such risks should be careful to leave significant unregulated space for product development.
健康技术正在飞速发展,其中许多技术出现在智能手机和平板电脑等消费产品上。联邦监管机构采取了灵活的应对措施,允许企业生产“一般健康产品”(“GWP”),而无需遵循通常适用于诊断或治疗疾病或病症的“设备”的监管规定。我们利用目前可用于各种疾病的医疗产品和设备,描述了企业如何通过在基本不受监管的GWP和受监管设备之间“游走于界限边缘”,利用这一现有的监管框架来开发创新产品。一方面,我们发现游走于界限边缘带来了各种好处,包括对产品开发、创新以及患者获取医疗技术的潜在改善。另一方面,我们表明这种做法对患者安全、竞争和数据共享存在潜在成本。换句话说,在GWP和设备之间游走于监管界限边缘带来了重要益处,但并非没有风险。任何旨在应对此类风险的进一步监管行动都应谨慎,为产品开发留出大量不受监管的空间。