Weimar Sascha Noel, Martjan Rahel Sophie, Terzidis Orestis
Institute for Entrepreneurship, Technology Management and Innovation (EnTechnon), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 9;27:e65725. doi: 10.2196/65725.
Digital health technology (DHT) has the potential to revolutionize the health care industry by reducing costs and improving the quality of care in a sector that faces significant challenges. However, the health care industry is complex, involving numerous stakeholders, and subject to extensive regulation. Within the European Union, medical device regulations impose stringent requirements on various ventures. Concurrently, new reimbursement pathways are also being developed for DHTs. In this dynamic context, establishing a sustainable and innovative business model around DHTs is fundamental for their successful commercialization. However, there is a notable lack of structured understanding regarding the overarching business models within the digital health sector.
This study aims to address this gap and identify key elements and configurations of business models for DHTs in the European Union, thereby establishing a structured understanding of the archetypal business models in use.
The study was conducted in 2 phases. First, a business model taxonomy for DHTs was developed based on a systematic literature review, the analysis of 169 European real-world business models, and qualitative evaluation through 13 expert interviews. Subsequently, a 2-step clustering analysis was conducted on the 169 DHT business models to identify distinct business model archetypes.
The developed taxonomy of DHT business models revealed 11 central dimensions organized into 4 meta-dimensions. Each dimension comprises 2 to 9 characteristics capturing relevant aspects of DHT business models. In addition, 6 archetypes of DHT business models were identified: administration and communication supporter (A1), insurer-to-consumer digital therapeutics and care (A2), diagnostic and treatment enabler (A3), professional monitoring platforms (A4), clinical research and solution accelerators (A5), and direct-to-consumer wellness and lifestyle (A6).
The findings highlight the critical elements constituting business models in the DHT domain, emphasizing the substantial impact of medical device regulations and revenue models, which often involve reimbursement from stakeholders such as health insurers. Three drivers contributing to DHT business model innovation were identified: direct targeting of patients and private individuals, use of artificial intelligence as an enabler, and development of DHT-specific reimbursement pathways. The study also uncovered surprising business model patterns, including shifts between regulated medical devices and unregulated research applications, as well as wellness and lifestyle solutions. This research enriches the understanding of business models in digital health, offering valuable insights for researchers and digital health entrepreneurs.
数字健康技术(DHT)有潜力通过降低成本和提高面临重大挑战的医疗保健行业的护理质量来彻底改变该行业。然而,医疗保健行业很复杂,涉及众多利益相关者,并受到广泛监管。在欧盟内部,医疗器械法规对各种企业提出了严格要求。同时,也在为数字健康技术开发新的报销途径。在这种动态背景下,围绕数字健康技术建立可持续和创新的商业模式对其成功商业化至关重要。然而,对于数字健康领域的总体商业模式,明显缺乏结构化的理解。
本研究旨在填补这一空白,确定欧盟数字健康技术商业模式的关键要素和配置,从而建立对所使用的原型商业模式的结构化理解。
该研究分两个阶段进行。首先,基于系统的文献综述、对169个欧洲实际商业模式的分析以及通过13次专家访谈进行的定性评估,开发了数字健康技术的商业模式分类法。随后,对169个数字健康技术商业模式进行了两步聚类分析,以识别不同的商业模式原型。
所开发的数字健康技术商业模式分类法揭示了11个核心维度,分为4个元维度。每个维度包括2至9个特征,涵盖了数字健康技术商业模式的相关方面。此外,还确定了6种数字健康技术商业模式原型:管理与沟通支持者(A1)、保险公司对消费者的数字疗法与护理(A2)、诊断与治疗促进者(A3)、专业监测平台(A4)、临床研究与解决方案加速器(A5)以及直接面向消费者的健康与生活方式(A6)。
研究结果突出了构成数字健康技术领域商业模式的关键要素,强调了医疗器械法规和收入模式的重大影响,收入模式通常涉及从健康保险公司等利益相关者获得报销。确定了推动数字健康技术商业模式创新的三个驱动因素:直接针对患者和个人、将人工智能用作推动因素以及开发数字健康技术特有的报销途径。该研究还发现了令人惊讶的商业模式模式,包括受监管的医疗器械与不受监管的研究应用之间的转变,以及健康与生活方式解决方案。这项研究丰富了对数字健康商业模式的理解,为研究人员和数字健康企业家提供了有价值的见解。