DNA extraction of bacterial cells using a semi-automated filtration system.

The COVID-19 pandemic lockdown created problems with importing of commercial kits resulting in extended turnaround times for consumable deliveries. One way to circumvent this was to use an inexpensive optimized in-house method for DNA extraction from water. • The DNA extraction methods were optimized on a 96-well plate using a semi-automated filtration system to increase the number of samples from 24 to 96 at a time in 2 h. The DNA extraction method optimizations included: (a) Guanidium thiocyanate method plus dilution series of celite to determine DNA binding capacity; (b) QIamp 96 Qiacube HT kit (Qiagen®); (c) Guanidium thiocyanate with the celite replaced with a binding buffer. • The in-house DNA extraction methods and adapted in-house DNA extraction method were compared to QIamp 96 Qiacube HT kit (Qiagen®), which is used on a 96-well semi-automated filtration system. The results showed maximum capacity of the 96-well filter plates was 400 μℓ broth (OD = 0.45 = 3.6 × 10 cells/mℓ) before the 96-well filters blocked. • When the methods were compared, there was no significant difference between the in-house DNA extraction method with 1:420 celite dilution (-value = 0.126) and the adapted in-house method with binding buffer (-value = 0.298) DNA yield or amplification of PCR products.