São Paulo, Brazil.
J Anal Psychol. 2022 Apr;67(2):635-645. doi: 10.1111/1468-5922.12795.
This paper aims at understanding the reception of the new anthropology, in particular the perspective of Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, by psychoanalysis and analytical psychology. Native peoples in Brazil have acquired visibility nationally and internationally, thanks to their mobilization and political organization. Award-winning books have been published such as A Queda do Céu (The Fall of the Sky) by Davi Kopenawa and Bruce Albert, and Ideias para Adiar o Fim do Mundo (Ideas to Postpone the End of the World) by Ailton Krenak. Freudian-based psychoanalysis keeps silent about native peoples and the new anthropology. The Lacanian psychoanalyst C. Dunker appears more open about it and wrote many articles and one important book on the subject. Jungians are the most enthusiastic and speak out politically about these peoples through courses, study groups, articles, online debates, books and the presence of native leaders and shamans in their conferences. This paper discusses the different perspectives on the issue in the psychoanalytical community, which vary from silence to excitement, and their subjacent political alliances.
本文旨在探讨新人类学,特别是爱德华多·维维罗思·德·卡斯特罗的观点,在精神分析学和分析心理学领域中的接受情况。由于巴西原住民的动员和政治组织,他们在国内和国际上获得了知名度。一些获奖书籍如戴维·克诺威拉和布鲁斯·阿尔伯特的《天空的坠落》以及艾尔顿·克伦克的《推迟世界末日的想法》已经出版。基于弗洛伊德理论的精神分析学对原住民和新人类学保持沉默。拉康派精神分析学家 C. 邓克尔对此表现出更为开放的态度,并撰写了许多关于该主题的文章和一本重要的书。荣格主义者对此最为热衷,并通过课程、研究小组、文章、在线辩论、书籍以及原住民领袖和萨满在会议上的出现,在政治上大声疾呼。本文讨论了精神分析学界对此问题的不同看法,从沉默到兴奋,以及它们潜在的政治联盟。