College of Medicine, University of the Philippines, 547 Pedro Gil Street, 1000, Manila, Philippines.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Oct;33(10):1273-1275. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01611-9. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
In this Commentary, we discuss disparities in resources for and access to cancer trials from the perspective of the Philippines, a lower-middle-income country in Southeast Asia, where cancer is the fourth leading cause of death. Geographic disparities play out such that academic institutions and clinical trials are centralized in the island of Luzon, particularly in the capital, Manila. These disparities are compounded by the lack of comprehensive cancer patient and clinical trial registries in the Philippines. Additionally, sociocultural considerations influence clinical trial implementation. Providers must consider the role of a patient's family in the decision to participate in clinical trials; a patient's degree of health literacy; and the economic burden of cancer care, with attention to both the direct and indirect financial toxicities associated with cancer care. Our call to action is threefold. (1) Bolster locally led trials and encourage international collaboration to improve diversity in trial participation and trials' generalizability. (2) Strengthen national trial registries to improve awareness of trials for which patients are eligible. (3) Integrate cultural competency frameworks that move beyond parachutism and parasitism in research and instead promote trust, reciprocity, and collaboration. These challenges may yet evolve, but in emphasizing these barriers, we hope to kindle further dialogue, new insights, and innovative action towards solving these disparities in cancer research, not just in the Philippines, but also in other low- and middle-income countries.
在这篇评论中,我们从菲律宾的角度讨论癌症试验资源和可及性方面的差异,菲律宾是东南亚的一个中低收入国家,癌症是第四大死亡原因。地理差异表现为学术机构和临床试验集中在吕宋岛,特别是在首都马尼拉。这些差异因菲律宾缺乏全面的癌症患者和临床试验登记处而更加复杂。此外,社会文化因素也会影响临床试验的实施。提供者必须考虑患者家庭在参与临床试验决策中的作用、患者的健康素养程度以及癌症治疗的经济负担,同时关注与癌症治疗相关的直接和间接经济毒性。我们的行动呼吁有三点。(1)加强本地主导的试验,并鼓励国际合作,以提高试验参与的多样性和试验的普遍性。(2)加强国家试验登记处,提高对患者有资格参加的试验的认识。(3)整合文化能力框架,超越研究中的“空降”和“寄生”,转而促进信任、互惠和合作。这些挑战可能还会演变,但通过强调这些障碍,我们希望激发更多的对话、新的见解和创新行动,以解决癌症研究中的这些差异,不仅在菲律宾,而且在其他低收入和中等收入国家也是如此。