Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan.
Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan.
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jul 11;2022:8466979. doi: 10.1155/2022/8466979. eCollection 2022.
This study is aimed at investigating the treatment options offered to and chosen by patients attending a student prosthodontics clinic and to investigate the effect of the sociodemographic background of participants on implant consideration. . A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 200 participants including their socioeconomic background, treatment options presented, treatment preferences, and implant consideration. Bivariate tests (unpaired -test, chi-square, and Mann-Whitney test) and Spearman correlation were used for comparison of different socioeconomic groups according to treatment preferences (implant consideration versus conventional removable prosthesis).
Treatment options presented by dental students include 63.5% complete denture, 32% implants/removable dentures, and partial denture 4.5%. Conventional removable prostheses were mostly chosen due to low income. Implants were only considered by 26% of participants. Age and implant consideration had a significant negative correlation. No significant difference in gender and residency area on implant consideration was found. The chi-square test showed a significant difference between implant consideration and conventional removable prostheses in the various occupation groups.
Low income is the main factor prohibiting patients from considering dental implants. Age and educational level may play a considerable role in considering dental implants. There should be more emphasis on dental students' treatment planning education to include and explain dental implants as a treatment option for their patients in the prosthodontics clinic.
本研究旨在调查在学生修复诊所就诊的患者所接受的治疗选择,并研究参与者的社会人口背景对种植体考虑因素的影响。进行了一项横断面描述性研究,共纳入 200 名参与者,包括他们的社会经济背景、提供的治疗选择、治疗偏好和种植体考虑因素。根据治疗偏好(种植体考虑与传统可摘义齿),使用双变量检验(非配对检验、卡方检验和曼-惠特尼检验)和 Spearman 相关性比较不同社会经济群体。
牙科学生提供的治疗选择包括 63.5%全口义齿、32%种植体/可摘义齿和 4.5%局部义齿。由于收入低,传统可摘义齿大多被选择。只有 26%的参与者考虑种植体。年龄和种植体考虑呈显著负相关。性别和居住地对种植体考虑没有显著差异。卡方检验显示,不同职业群体中,种植体考虑与传统可摘义齿之间存在显著差异。
低收入是患者考虑种植牙的主要因素。年龄和教育水平可能在考虑种植牙方面发挥重要作用。应该更加重视牙科学生的治疗计划教育,在修复诊所为患者提供种植牙作为治疗选择,并进行解释。