von Kleeck B Wade, Hostetler Zach, Fleischmann Kevin, Weaver Ashley A, Gayzik F Scott
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(sup1):S74-S79. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2097223. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
The objective of this study is to generate age targeted versions of the male and female Global Human Body Models Consortium (GHBMC) occupant human body models (HBMs), to validate each in frontal impacts, and to assess rib fracture probability of each.
Six age targeted models were developed based on the GHBMC average male and small female occupant models (M50-O v6.0 and F05-O v6.0, respectively). All age targeted models were modified to represent population means for height, weight, shape, and relevant material properties. The thin plate spline method was used to morph models, and material properties were modified using available literature. Validation focused on chest response. Models were evaluated in a rigid body frontal chest impact at 6.7 m/s. Furthermore, the male and female age targeted models were evaluated against published data from 40 km/hr and 30 km/hr frontal sled tests respectively.
Chest deflections and landmark kinematics reasonably matched the respective corridors in the M50-O and F05-O aged models. Regional probability of rib fracture was assessed using probabilistic methods based on cortex strain. Increasing rib fracture with age was observed in both impacts for both sexes. For the rigid chest impact, the M50-O 70YO resulted in 10 ribs exceeding 50% probability of fracture whereas the younger ages reported 4 to 6 ribs exceeding the same probability. In the same simulation, the F05-O 70YO resulted in 8 regions exceeding 50% probability of rib fracture as opposed to 3 and 0 such regions at the youngest ages. Sled simulation demonstrated similar trends. The 70YO age adjusted models best aligned with the reported extent of fractures from the referenced PMHS studies, which tend to be composed of subjects of advanced age.
Age targeted HBMs demonstrated increased fracture probability with age when subjected to equivalent impacts. Gross model kinematics approximate PMHS data but showed little difference between targeted age models. The findings indicate that while gross kinematics are unaffected by age-targeting models, such models can capture trends of increased thoracic injury risk observed in experimental and field studies, and further suggest their potential use to target interventions for vulnerable driving populations, such as older adults.
本研究的目的是生成男性和女性全球人体模型联盟(GHBMC)乘员人体模型(HBMs)的年龄针对性版本,在正面碰撞中对每个模型进行验证,并评估每个模型的肋骨骨折概率。
基于GHBMC平均男性和小个子女性乘员模型(分别为M50 - O v6.0和F05 - O v6.0)开发了六个年龄针对性模型。所有年龄针对性模型都进行了修改,以代表身高、体重、体型和相关材料特性的总体均值。使用薄板样条法对模型进行变形,并利用现有文献修改材料特性。验证重点在于胸部响应。在6.7米/秒的刚体正面胸部碰撞中对模型进行评估。此外,分别根据40公里/小时和30公里/小时正面雪橇试验的已发表数据对男性和女性年龄针对性模型进行评估。
胸部挠度和地标运动学与M50 - O和F05 - O年龄模型中的各自通道合理匹配。使用基于皮质应变的概率方法评估肋骨骨折的区域概率。在两种碰撞中,男女均观察到随着年龄增长肋骨骨折增加。对于刚体胸部碰撞,M50 - O 70岁模型有10根肋骨骨折概率超过50%,而较年轻年龄组报告有4至6根肋骨超过相同概率。在同一模拟中,F05 - O 70岁模型有8个区域肋骨骨折概率超过50%,而最年轻年龄组分别为3个和0个这样的区域。雪橇模拟显示出类似趋势。70岁年龄调整后的模型与参考的尸体人类受试者(PMHS)研究报告的骨折程度最相符,这些研究的受试者往往是老年人。
年龄针对性的HBMs在受到同等碰撞时显示出随着年龄增长骨折概率增加。总体模型运动学近似于PMHS数据,但在年龄针对性模型之间差异不大。研究结果表明,虽然总体运动学不受年龄针对性模型的影响,但此类模型可以捕捉在实验和现场研究中观察到的胸部损伤风险增加的趋势,并进一步表明它们在针对易受伤害驾驶人群(如老年人)的干预措施方面的潜在用途。