School of Aerospace Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, China.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(7):422-427. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2093352. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
The aim of this study was to examine the effects of emergency avoidance behaviors on the kinematics and injuries of electric two-wheeler (ETW) riders.
Four typical riding postures of ETW riders before collisions, including one normal posture and three avoidance postures, were identified through analysis of 298 videos of vehicle to ETW accidents. Crash simulations were then performed using the Total Human Model of Safety (THUMS) occupant model, ETW and a sedan finite element (FE) model, and the kinematics of ETW riders were compared. The risk of head injury and lower extremity injury was also investigated.
When the struck foot position of the ETW rider was lower than the ETW pedal, the lower extremity was struck by the sedan bumper and ETW frame from the right and left side respectively, and the upper body of the rider rotated around the hood leading edge. At a car velocity of 40 km/h, the rider was at high risk of head injury and the tibia was fractured. The medial cruciate ligament (MCL) was ruptured in both the 20 km/h and 40 km/h collisions. When the struck foot position of the ETW rider was higher than the pedal, the lower extremity was hit by the bumper and then rebounded. In this situation, the bending moments of the femur and tibia, as well as the bending angle and shear displacement of the knee joint were less than the injury threshold in all crash simulations. Furthermore, when the head was turned toward the colliding car, the risk of head injury varied with the emergency avoidance posture.
The height of the struck foot relative to the ETW pedal influenced the rider's global kinematics, and head and lower extremity injuries risk. In the struck side foot landing and both feet landing postures, the lower extremity was restrained and compressed by the ETW frame, resulting in a high risk of tibia fracture and MCL rupture. Reducing the impact velocities could effectively mitigate the injury risk of the ETW riders; however, loading patterns remain an important factor influencing the risk of lower extremity injury.
本研究旨在探讨紧急避险行为对电动两轮车(ETW)骑手运动学和损伤的影响。
通过对 298 起车辆与 ETW 事故视频的分析,确定了 ETW 骑手碰撞前的 4 种典型骑行姿势,包括 1 种正常姿势和 3 种避险姿势。然后使用 Total Human Model of Safety(THUMS)乘员模型、ETW 和轿车有限元(FE)模型进行碰撞模拟,并比较 ETW 骑手的运动学。还研究了头部损伤和下肢损伤的风险。
当 ETW 骑手被撞脚的位置低于 ETW 踏板时,下肢分别被轿车保险杠和 ETW 车架从右侧和左侧撞击,骑手的上半身围绕引擎盖前缘旋转。在轿车速度为 40km/h 的情况下,骑手头部受伤风险较高,胫骨骨折。在 20km/h 和 40km/h 的碰撞中,内侧十字韧带(MCL)均断裂。当 ETW 骑手被撞脚的位置高于踏板时,下肢先被保险杠撞击,然后反弹。在这种情况下,所有碰撞模拟中股骨和胫骨的弯矩、膝关节的弯曲角度和剪切位移均低于损伤阈值。此外,当头转向碰撞车辆时,头部受伤的风险随紧急避险姿势而变化。
被撞脚相对于 ETW 踏板的高度影响骑手的整体运动学和头部及下肢受伤风险。在被撞侧脚着地和双脚着地姿势中,下肢被 ETW 车架约束和压缩,导致胫骨骨折和 MCL 断裂的风险较高。降低撞击速度可有效降低 ETW 骑手的受伤风险;但是,加载模式仍然是影响下肢损伤风险的重要因素。