• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Numerical investigation of the rider's head injury in typical single-electric self-balancing scooter accident scenarios.典型单电动自平衡滑板车事故场景中骑手头部损伤的数值研究。
J R Soc Interface. 2022 Sep;19(194):20220495. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0495. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
2
Simulative investigation on head injuries of electric self-balancing scooter riders subject to ground impact.针对电动自平衡滑板车骑手在地面撞击时头部受伤的模拟研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Apr;89:128-41. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
3
Numerical Investigation on Head and Brain Injuries Caused by Windshield Impact on Riders Using Electric Self-Balancing Scooters.电动平衡车骑行者挡风玻璃撞击致头部和脑部损伤的数值研究
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2018 Mar 25;2018:5738090. doi: 10.1155/2018/5738090. eCollection 2018.
4
Can emergency avoidance behavior reduce injuries to electric two-wheeler riders in vehicle collisions?紧急避险行为能否降低两轮电动车骑手在车辆碰撞中的受伤风险?
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(7):422-427. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2093352. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
5
Analysis of rider and child pillion passenger kinematics along with injury mechanisms during motorcycle crash.分析摩托车事故中骑手和儿童后座乘客的运动学特征及损伤机制。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup1):S13-S20. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1616180.
6
Computational prediction of head-ground impact kinematics in e-scooter falls.电动滑板车摔倒时头部-地面碰撞运动学的计算预测。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Mar;167:106567. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106567. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
7
Are electric self-balancing scooters safe in vehicle crash accidents?电动自平衡滑板车在车辆碰撞事故中安全吗?
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Feb;87:102-16. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.022. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
8
A study on correlation of pedestrian head injuries with physical parameters using in-depth traffic accident data and mathematical models.利用深入的交通事故数据和数学模型研究行人头部损伤与物理参数的相关性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Oct;119:91-103. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
9
Are riders of electric two-wheelers safer than bicyclists in collisions with motor vehicles?与机动车碰撞时,电动两轮车骑手比骑自行车的人更安全吗?
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jan;134:105336. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105336. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
10
Prediction of injury risks and features among scooter riders through MADYMO reconstruction of a scooter-microvan accident: Identifying the driver and passengers.通过踏板车与小型货车事故的MADYMO重建预测踏板车骑手的受伤风险和特征:识别驾驶员和乘客
J Forensic Leg Med. 2019 Jul;65:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Vehicle Steering Strategy on the Severity of Pedestrian Head Injury.车辆转向策略对行人头部损伤严重程度的影响
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 Sep 30;9(10):593. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9100593.

本文引用的文献

1
Should anthropometric differences between the commonly used pedestrian computational biomechanics models and Chinese population be taken into account when predicting pedestrian head kinematics and injury in vehicle collisions in China?在中国进行车辆碰撞中预测行人头部运动学和损伤时,是否应该考虑常用行人计算生物力学模型与中国人群之间的人体测量学差异?
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Aug;173:106718. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106718. Epub 2022 May 28.
2
Evaluation of the head protection effectiveness of cyclist helmets using full-scale computational biomechanics modelling of cycling accidents.使用自行车事故的全尺寸计算生物力学模型评估自行车头盔的头部保护效果。
J Safety Res. 2022 Feb;80:109-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
3
Computational prediction of head-ground impact kinematics in e-scooter falls.电动滑板车摔倒时头部-地面碰撞运动学的计算预测。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Mar;167:106567. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106567. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
Concussion biomechanics, head acceleration exposure and brain injury criteria in sport: a review.运动中的脑震荡生物力学、头部加速度暴露与脑损伤标准:综述
Sports Biomech. 2024 Nov;23(11):1888-1916. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2021.2016929. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
5
An Overview of the Effectiveness of Bicycle Helmet Designs in Impact Testing.自行车头盔设计在冲击测试中的有效性概述
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Sep 27;9:718407. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.718407. eCollection 2021.
6
Evaluation of Head Injury Criteria for Injury Prediction Effectiveness: Computational Reconstruction of Real-World Vulnerable Road User Impact Accidents.评估用于损伤预测有效性的头部损伤标准:现实世界中弱势道路使用者碰撞事故的计算重建
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Jun 29;9:677982. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.677982. eCollection 2021.
7
The Influence of Gait Stance and Vehicle Type on Pedestrian Kinematics and Injury Risk.步态姿势和车辆类型对行人运动学和受伤风险的影响。
J Biomech Eng. 2021 Oct 1;143(10). doi: 10.1115/1.4051224.
8
Development and Application of Digital Human Models in the Field of Vehicle Collisions: A Review.数字人体模型在车辆碰撞领域的开发与应用:综述。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2021 Jul;49(7):1619-1632. doi: 10.1007/s10439-021-02794-z. Epub 2021 May 13.
9
Ranking and Rating Bicycle Helmet Safety Performance in Oblique Impacts Using Eight Different Brain Injury Models.使用八种不同的脑损伤模型对自行车头盔安全性能进行倾斜冲击的分级和评价。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2021 Mar;49(3):1097-1109. doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02703-w. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
10
Instantaneous Whole-Brain Strain Estimation in Dynamic Head Impact.动态头部撞击中瞬时全脑应变的估计。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Apr 15;38(8):1023-1035. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7281. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

典型单电动自平衡滑板车事故场景中骑手头部损伤的数值研究。

Numerical investigation of the rider's head injury in typical single-electric self-balancing scooter accident scenarios.

机构信息

School of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, Hunan People's Republic of China.

School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, Fujian, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J R Soc Interface. 2022 Sep;19(194):20220495. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0495. Epub 2022 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1098/rsif.2022.0495
PMID:36128701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9490341/
Abstract

As the use of electric self-balancing scooters (ESSs) increases, so does the number of related traffic accidents. Because of the special control method, mechanical structure and driving posture, ESSs are prone to various single-vehicle accidents, such as collisions with fixed obstacles and falls due to mechanical failures. In various ESS accident scenarios, the rider's head injury is the most frequent injury type. In this study, several typical single-ESS accident scenarios are reconstructed via computational methods, and the risk of riders' head/brain injury is assessed in depth using various injury criteria. Results showed that two types of ESSs (solo- and two-wheeler) do not have clear differences in head kinematics and head injury risks; the head kinematics (or falling posture) and ESS accident scenario exhibit a distinct effect on the head injury responses; half of the analysed ESS riders have a 50% probability of skull fracture, a few riders have a 50% risk of abbreviated injury scale (AIS) 4+ brain injury, and none has a diffuse axonal injury; the ESS speed plays an important role in producing the head/brain injury in ESS riders, and generally, higher ESS speed generates higher level of predicted head injury parameters. These findings will provide theoretical support for preventing head injury among ESS riders and data support for developing and legislating ESSs.

摘要

随着电动自平衡滑板车(ESS)的使用增多,相关交通事故的数量也在增加。由于特殊的控制方法、机械结构和驾驶姿势,ESS 容易发生各种单车事故,如与固定障碍物碰撞和机械故障导致的摔倒。在各种 ESS 事故场景中,骑手头部受伤是最常见的受伤类型。在本研究中,通过计算方法对几种典型的单辆 ESS 事故场景进行了重建,并使用各种损伤标准深入评估了骑手头部/大脑损伤的风险。结果表明,两种类型的 ESS(独轮和两轮)在头部运动学和头部损伤风险方面没有明显差异;头部运动学(或摔倒姿势)和 ESS 事故场景对头部损伤反应有明显影响;分析的 ESS 骑手中有一半有 50%的颅骨骨折概率,少数骑手有 50%的损伤严重程度评分(AIS)4+脑损伤风险,没有弥漫性轴索损伤;ESS 速度在产生 ESS 骑手头部/大脑损伤中起着重要作用,通常,ESS 速度越高,预测的头部损伤参数水平越高。这些发现将为预防 ESS 骑手头部受伤提供理论支持,并为开发和制定 ESS 法规提供数据支持。