Suppr超能文献

评估社区居住老年人虚弱的工具:系统评价。

Instruments to assess frailty in community dwelling older adults: A systematic review.

机构信息

College of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, 3-141 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy (ECHA), 11405 87 Avenue, Edmonton T6G 1C9, AB, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, 6-10 University Terrace, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2R7, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Oct;134:104316. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104316. Epub 2022 Jun 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Frailty has been investigated for decades with a proliferation of frailty instruments attributed to many existing conceptual models and operational criteria. The purpose of this systematic review was to understand how instruments were developed to assess frailty in community dwelling older adults.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This review followed standard conduct, reporting, and quality assessment guidelines. Articles published in English that described instruments used to measure frailty in community dwelling older adults 65 years of age or older; and instruments developed for research purposes or in clinical practice were included. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE (March 2022) and Abstracts in Social Gerontology (March 2020) were searched.

RESULTS

A total of 32 frailty instruments were identified with self-reported, performance-based, or researcher/clinician observed items. Common characteristics across instruments were categorized as follows: frailty conceptualized as a state or a syndrome; frailty operationalized as continuous, categorical, or dichotomous; and instruments developed for clinical, research or both purposes. All items in the instruments were developed based on theories of frailty; some were informed by panels of experts; and others used statistical methods to compare variables across instruments.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Results from this review will assist clinicians/researchers select appropriate instruments to assess frailty in older adults living in the community. It is time to pause on the development of more instruments. Instead, efforts must be directed toward advancing research and clinical practice using existing validated instruments to inform clinical decision-making and health care coordination to avoid, delay, or manage frailty in the community.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

More research and clinical practice using existing validated frailty instruments to assess frailty in older adults living in the community is a must!

摘要

背景和目的

虚弱已经被研究了几十年,由于存在许多现有的概念模型和操作标准,因此出现了大量的虚弱评估工具。本系统评价的目的是了解用于评估社区居住的老年人虚弱状况的工具是如何开发的。

研究设计和方法

本研究遵循标准的实施、报告和质量评估指南。纳入了发表在英文期刊上、用于评估社区居住的 65 岁或以上老年人虚弱状况的工具,以及为研究或临床实践目的开发的工具。检索了 MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 EMBASE(2022 年 3 月)和 Abstracts in Social Gerontology(2020 年 3 月)。

结果

共确定了 32 种虚弱评估工具,这些工具包含自我报告、基于表现的或研究人员/临床医生观察的项目。工具的共同特征如下:虚弱被概念化为一种状态或综合征;虚弱的操作性定义为连续的、分类的或二分类的;以及为临床、研究或两者目的开发的工具。工具中的所有项目都是基于虚弱理论开发的;有些是由专家小组提供信息的;还有一些使用统计方法来比较工具之间的变量。

讨论和意义

本研究的结果将有助于临床医生/研究人员选择适当的工具来评估社区中老年人的虚弱状况。现在是时候停止开发更多的工具了。相反,必须努力使用现有的经过验证的工具来推进研究和临床实践,以便为临床决策和医疗保健协调提供信息,从而避免、延缓或管理社区中的虚弱状况。

推特摘要

使用现有的经过验证的虚弱评估工具来评估社区中老年人的虚弱状况,这方面需要更多的研究和临床实践!

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验