• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政治意识形态预测民主国家 COVID-19 期间的预防行为和感染。

Political ideology predicts preventative behaviors and infections amid COVID-19 in democracies.

机构信息

Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Center for Research in Econometric Theory and Applications, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

AHEAD Intelligence Ltd, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2022 Sep;308:115199. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115199. Epub 2022 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115199
PMID:35863153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9278997/
Abstract

Can one's political ideology predict his or her testing positive for COVID-19 and how? The present study leveraged a recent (April-May 2020) survey of 27,260 individuals across 27 democracies to investigate the associations between political ideology and coronavirus infections. Our individual-level data and mediation analyses allow us to tease out different correlational paths according to which one's political ideology affects his or her infection. We found a more right-leaning attitude to be associated with a higher probability of testing positive both directly and indirectly through conspiracy theory beliefs and physical distancing. Moreover, our cross-national investigation also found that becoming more right-leaning in ideology was associated with a higher level of perceived risk of COVID-19 infection, which made one less likely to test positive. Combined, we provide a more nuanced understanding of the role played by political ideology in the current pandemic, on which the design of a more effective risk communication strategy can be based.

摘要

一个人的政治意识形态能否预测他或她 COVID-19 检测呈阳性,以及如何预测?本研究利用最近(2020 年 4 月至 5 月)对 27 个民主国家的 27260 个人进行的调查,调查了政治意识形态与冠状病毒感染之间的关联。我们的个人层面数据和中介分析允许我们根据一个人的政治意识形态影响他或她感染的不同相关路径来区分。我们发现,更倾向于右派的态度与检测呈阳性的概率更高直接相关,也通过阴谋论信仰和保持身体距离间接相关。此外,我们的跨国调查还发现,意识形态上变得更加右派与对 COVID-19 感染的感知风险水平更高相关,这使得检测呈阳性的可能性降低。综上所述,我们更细致地了解了政治意识形态在当前大流行中的作用,这可以为制定更有效的风险沟通策略提供依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4093/9278997/318ed2faa2ef/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4093/9278997/318ed2faa2ef/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4093/9278997/318ed2faa2ef/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Political ideology predicts preventative behaviors and infections amid COVID-19 in democracies.政治意识形态预测民主国家 COVID-19 期间的预防行为和感染。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Sep;308:115199. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115199. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
2
Political ideology and generosity around the globe.全球政治意识形态和慷慨程度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Apr 11;120(15):e2219676120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2219676120. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
3
Perceived risk, political polarization, and the willingness to follow COVID-19 mitigation guidelines.感知风险、政治极化与遵循 COVID-19 缓解指南的意愿。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jul;305:115091. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115091. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
4
Political ideology shapes risk and benefit judgments of COVID-19 vaccines.政治意识形态影响人们对新冠疫苗的风险和收益判断。
Risk Anal. 2024 Jan;44(1):126-140. doi: 10.1111/risa.14150. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
5
Information Seeking and Avoidance in the COVID-19 Pandemic as a Function of Political Ideology and National Context: A Survey Comparing the US and Germany.新冠疫情期间的信息寻求与回避行为与政治意识形态和国家背景的关系:一项比较美国和德国的调查。
Health Commun. 2024 Oct;39(11):2276-2289. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2263220. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
6
Political Ideology, Ingroup Favoritism, and Conspiratorial Thinking: Patriotism, Nationalism, and COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories.政治意识形态、内群体偏好和阴谋思维:爱国主义、民族主义与新冠病毒阴谋论。
Psychol Rep. 2023 Aug;126(4):1784-1802. doi: 10.1177/00332941221079727. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
7
Democrats and independents stigmatize people with COVID-19 greater compared to Republicans.与共和党人相比,民主党人和无党派人士对新冠肺炎患者的污名化更严重。
J Soc Psychol. 2023 Mar 4;163(2):158-173. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2022.2144709. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
8
The influence of gain-loss framing and its interaction with political ideology on social distancing and mask wearing compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,得失框架及其与政治意识形态的相互作用对社交距离和口罩佩戴合规性的影响。
Curr Psychol. 2023;42(10):8028-8038. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02148-x. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
9
Of pandemics, politics, and personality: The role of conscientiousness and political ideology in the sharing of fake news.论大流行病、政治和人格:尽责性和政治意识形态在假新闻传播中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 May;151(5):1154-1177. doi: 10.1037/xge0001120. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
10
Analytic Thinking and Political Orientation in the Corona Crisis.新冠危机中的分析性思维与政治倾向
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 22;12:631800. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631800. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Covid-19 skepticism and public health norms during refugee assistance: does skepticism always lead to poor safety protocol adherence?新冠病毒怀疑论与难民援助中的公共卫生规范:怀疑论是否总会导致安全协议遵守度下降?
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 22;24(1):881. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18232-3.
2
In the COVID-19 pandemic, who did we trust? An eight-country cross-sectional study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,我们信任谁?一项八国横断面研究。
J Glob Health. 2023 Sep 1;13:06036. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.06036.
3
Political ideology and generosity around the globe.

本文引用的文献

1
Finding Someone to Blame: The Link Between COVID-19 Conspiracy Beliefs, Prejudice, Support for Violence, and Other Negative Social Outcomes.寻找替罪羊:新冠疫情阴谋论、偏见、对暴力的支持及其他负面社会后果之间的联系
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 14;12:726076. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726076. eCollection 2021.
2
National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic.国家认同预测全球大流行期间的公共卫生支持。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jan 26;13(1):517. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27668-9.
3
The trajectory of COVID-19 pandemic and handwashing adherence: findings from 14 countries.
全球政治意识形态和慷慨程度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Apr 11;120(15):e2219676120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2219676120. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
4
COVID-Dynamic: A large-scale longitudinal study of socioemotional and behavioral change across the pandemic.COVID-Dynamic:一项针对大流行期间社会情感和行为变化的大规模纵向研究。
Sci Data. 2023 Feb 3;10(1):71. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01901-6.
COVID-19 大流行的轨迹和洗手依从性:来自 14 个国家的发现。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 5;21(1):1791. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11822-5.
4
Pairing facts with imagined consequences improves pandemic-related risk perception.将事实与想象的后果相匹配可提高对大流行病相关风险的感知。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 10;118(32). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2100970118.
5
Impacts of social distancing policies on mobility and COVID-19 case growth in the US.社交隔离政策对美国流动性和 COVID-19 病例增长的影响。
Nat Commun. 2021 May 25;12(1):3118. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23404-5.
6
Coronavirus risk perception and compliance with social distancing measures in a sample of young adults: Evidence from Switzerland.冠状病毒风险认知与瑞士青年群体对社会疏离措施的遵从度:一项实证研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0247447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247447. eCollection 2021.
7
Social distancing decreases an individual's likelihood of contracting COVID-19.社交距离减少了个体感染 COVID-19 的可能性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 23;118(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023131118.
8
Partisan public health: how does political ideology influence support for COVID-19 related misinformation?党派性公共卫生:政治意识形态如何影响对新冠疫情相关错误信息的支持?
J Comput Soc Sci. 2020;3(2):319-342. doi: 10.1007/s42001-020-00089-2. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
9
Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.党派之间在保持社交距离方面的分歧与 COVID-19 大流行期间的健康结果有关。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Nov;4(11):1186-1197. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00977-7. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
10
Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic.两极分化与公共卫生:新冠疫情期间社会 distancing 方面的党派差异。 (注:这里“social distancing”常见释义为“社交距离” ,但原文中该词似乎有误,可能是“social distancing measures”之类表述会更准确,直接翻译的话就是“社会距离” )
J Public Econ. 2020 Nov;191:104254. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254. Epub 2020 Aug 6.