• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解决癌症全程中的健康差异——洛杉矶实现公平的方法

Addressing Health Disparities Across the Cancer Continuum-a Los Angeles Approach to Achieving Equity.

作者信息

Finster Laurel J, Shirazipour Celina H, Escobedo Loraine A, Cockburn Myles, Surani Zul, Haile Robert W

机构信息

Cancer Research Center for Health Equity, Division of Medical Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 5;12:912832. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.912832. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.912832
PMID:35865462
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9295745/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Different models have been developed to address inequities across the cancer care continuum. However, there remains a scarcity of best practices on understanding and responding to the burden of cancer in a defined catchment area.As such, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) recently provided a framework to maximize the impact on cancer burden, including a greater focus on community outreach and engagement. In this paper, we describe how Cedars Sinai Cancer (CSC), a health system that serves one of the most diverse counties in the US, implemented the framework to define its catchment area, characterize its population, identify high risk priority groups, and make decisions to address health disparities.

METHODS

We provide a review of the methods used to assess socio-ecological levels of influence. Data were reviewed from numerous national, statewide, and county sources and supplemented by locally administered questionnaires, heat maps, and community profile summaries to gain more localized snapshots of cancer disparities in Los Angeles County. Lastly, feedback was solicited from external peer groups, community stakeholders, and key decision-makers, and the proposed catchment area was aligned with the State's Cancer Plan and the NCI Catchment Area and Community Outreach and Engagement Mandate.

RESULTS

The selected CSC catchment area meets NCI criteria and has potential to demonstrate impact both at the population level and within specialty populations. As a result, strategies are being developed to organize community outreach and engagement, as well as research across basic, clinical, and population sciences to guide cancer control and prevention efforts.

DISCUSSION

To maintain a high level of cultural inclusion and sensitivity, multiple layers of data are needed to understand localized pictures of cancer disparities and underlying causes. Community engagement remains essential to implementing policy, best practice, and translational science for broader impact.

IMPACT

The clinical and translation work conducted at any cancer center requires an understanding of the determinants of health that contribute to the differences in cancer incidence and mortality among different groups. The NCI-aligned approach that we highlight is critical to support the design of future cancer control strategies that address and possibly reduce local health inequities.

摘要

引言

为解决癌症护理连续过程中的不平等问题,已开发出不同模式。然而,在明确的集水区内,关于理解和应对癌症负担的最佳实践仍然匮乏。因此,美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)最近提供了一个框架,以最大限度地提高对癌症负担的影响,包括更加关注社区外展和参与。在本文中,我们描述了西达赛奈癌症中心(CSC),一个服务于美国最多元化县之一的医疗系统,如何实施该框架来定义其集水区、描述其人口特征、识别高风险优先群体,并做出解决健康差距的决策。

方法

我们回顾了用于评估社会生态影响水平的方法。数据来自众多国家、州和县级来源,并辅以当地管理的调查问卷、热图和社区概况摘要,以获取洛杉矶县癌症差异的更本地化快照。最后,征求了外部同行团体、社区利益相关者和关键决策者的反馈意见,并使拟议的集水区与该州的癌症计划以及NCI集水区和社区外展与参与任务保持一致。

结果

选定的CSC集水区符合NCI标准,有潜力在人群层面和特定人群中展示影响。因此,正在制定战略,以组织社区外展和参与,以及开展基础、临床和人群科学研究,以指导癌症控制和预防工作。

讨论

为保持高度的文化包容性和敏感性,需要多层数据来了解癌症差异的本地化情况及其根本原因。社区参与对于实施政策、最佳实践和转化科学以产生更广泛影响仍然至关重要。

影响

任何癌症中心开展的临床和转化工作都需要了解导致不同群体癌症发病率和死亡率差异的健康决定因素。我们强调的与NCI一致的方法对于支持未来癌症控制策略的设计至关重要,这些策略能够解决并可能减少当地的健康不平等问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7db/9295745/1b5e2754b2a6/fonc-12-912832-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7db/9295745/469b6ff9ca68/fonc-12-912832-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7db/9295745/7348a0678c23/fonc-12-912832-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7db/9295745/827e2ed8f22d/fonc-12-912832-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7db/9295745/1b5e2754b2a6/fonc-12-912832-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7db/9295745/469b6ff9ca68/fonc-12-912832-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7db/9295745/7348a0678c23/fonc-12-912832-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7db/9295745/827e2ed8f22d/fonc-12-912832-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7db/9295745/1b5e2754b2a6/fonc-12-912832-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Addressing Health Disparities Across the Cancer Continuum-a Los Angeles Approach to Achieving Equity.解决癌症全程中的健康差异——洛杉矶实现公平的方法
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 5;12:912832. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.912832. eCollection 2022.
2
Special Convening and Listening Session on Health Equity and Community Outreach and Engagement at National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers.国立癌症研究所指定的综合癌症中心关于健康公平及社区外展与参与的特别召集和听证会
Health Equity. 2021 Feb 26;5(1):84-90. doi: 10.1089/heq.2020.0155. eCollection 2021.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Evolution of community outreach and engagement at National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers, an evolving journey.国家癌症研究所指定癌症中心的社区外展和参与的演变:一段不断发展的旅程。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jul-Aug;74(4):383-396. doi: 10.3322/caac.21841. Epub 2024 May 4.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Tuberculosis结核病
7
Operational strategies for achieving comprehensive cancer center community outreach and engagement objectives: impact and logic models.实现综合癌症中心社区外展与参与目标的运营策略:影响与逻辑模型
Arch Public Health. 2024 Mar 14;82(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01252-1.
8
Addressing Cancer Disparities Through Community Engagement: Lessons and Best Practices.通过社区参与解决癌症差异:经验教训与最佳实践
Cureus. 2023 Aug 14;15(8):e43445. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43445. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
Cancer Prevention from the Viewpoint of UVA Comprehensive Cancer Center.从 UVA 综合癌症中心的角度看癌症预防。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2022 Nov 1;15(11):715-720. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0365. Epub 2022 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Community engagement in the context of cancer: scoping review of definitions and measures to inform program-level analysis.癌症背景下的社区参与:关于定义和措施的范围综述,以为项目层面的分析提供信息。
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-02026-y.
2
Interinstitutional Approach to Advancing Geospatial Technologies for US Cancer Centers.美国癌症中心推进地理空间技术的机构间方法。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Aug;8:e2400099. doi: 10.1200/CCI.24.00099.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer health disparities in racial/ethnic minorities in the United States.美国少数族裔的癌症健康差距。
Br J Cancer. 2021 Jan;124(2):315-332. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01038-6. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
2
Population Health Assessment in NCI-Designated Cancer Center Catchment Areas.国家癌症研究所指定癌症中心集水区的人口健康评估。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Mar;28(3):428-430. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0811. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
3
Catchment Areas and Community Outreach and Engagement: The New Mandate for NCI-Designated Cancer Centers.
集水区与社区外展及参与:美国国立癌症研究所指定癌症中心的新使命
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 May;27(5):517-519. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-1050.
4
Representation of Minorities and Women in Oncology Clinical Trials: Review of the Past 14 Years.肿瘤学临床试验中少数群体和女性的代表性:对过去 14 年的回顾。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Jan;14(1):e1-e10. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.025288. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
5
Building a National Culture of Health: Background, Action Framework, Measures, and Next Steps.构建全民健康文化:背景、行动框架、措施及后续步骤。
Rand Health Q. 2017 Jan 13;6(2):3. eCollection 2017 Jan.
6
Building a culture of health: A new framework and measures for health and health care in America.构建健康文化:美国健康与医疗保健的新框架及措施
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;165:206-213. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.043. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
7
State of the science on prevention and screening to reduce melanoma incidence and mortality: The time is now.预防和筛查以降低黑色素瘤发病率和死亡率的科学现状:当下正是时机。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Nov 12;66(6):460-480. doi: 10.3322/caac.21352. Epub 2016 May 27.
8
Community collaborative for colorectal cancer screening in Los Angeles Koreatown.洛杉矶韩国城结直肠癌筛查社区协作项目
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015 May;26(2 Suppl):164-70. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0053.
9
STRUCTURAL RACISM AND HEALTH INEQUITIES: Old Issues, New Directions.结构性种族主义与健康不平等:老问题,新方向。
Du Bois Rev. 2011 Apr;8(1):115-132. doi: 10.1017/S1742058X11000130.
10
Unequal burden of disease, unequal participation in clinical trials: solutions from African American and Latino community members.疾病负担不平等,参与临床试验的机会不平等:非裔美国人和拉丁裔社区成员提出的解决方案。
Health Soc Work. 2013 Feb;38(1):29-38. doi: 10.1093/hsw/hlt001.