Sauer Hanno, Blunden Charlie, Eriksen Cecilie, Rehren Paul
Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.
Philos Compass. 2021 Oct;16(10):e12769. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12769. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
Societies change over time. Chattel slavery and foot-binding have been abolished, democracy has become increasingly widespread, gay rights have become established in some countries, and the animal rights movement continues to gain momentum. Do these changes count as moral progress? Is there such a thing? If so, how should we understand it? These questions have been receiving increasing attention from philosophers, psychologists, biologists, and sociologists in recent decades. This survey provides a systematic account of recent developments in the understanding of moral progress. We outline the concept of moral progress and describe the different types of moral progress identified in the literature. We review the normative criteria that have been used in judging whether various developments count as morally progressive or not. We discuss the prospects of moral progress in the face of challenges that claim that moral progress is not psychologically possible for human beings, and we explore the metaethical implications of moral progress.
社会会随着时间而变化。动产奴隶制和缠足已被废除,民主日益广泛传播,一些国家的同性恋权利已得到确立,动物权利运动也在不断发展壮大。这些变化能算作道德进步吗?存在道德进步这回事吗?如果有,我们该如何理解它?近几十年来,这些问题越来越受到哲学家、心理学家、生物学家和社会学家的关注。本综述系统阐述了对道德进步理解的最新进展。我们概述了道德进步的概念,并描述了文献中所确定的不同类型的道德进步。我们回顾了用于判断各种发展是否算作道德进步的规范性标准。我们讨论了面对声称道德进步对人类而言在心理上是不可能的挑战时道德进步的前景,并且我们探讨了道德进步的元伦理学含义。