Van Houwelingen Gijs, Van Dijke Marius, Hoogervorst Niek, Meijs Lucas, De Cremer David
Amsterdam Business School, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 5;13:908021. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.908021. eCollection 2022.
Punishment and forgiveness are two very different responses to a moral transgression that both have been argued to restore perceptions of moral order within an organization. Unfortunately, it is currently unclear what motivates organizational actors to punish or forgive a norm transgressor. We build on social cognitive theory to argue that punishment and forgiveness of a transgressor are both rooted in self-regulatory processes. Specifically, we argue that organizational actors are more likely to respond to intentional transgressions with punishment, and to unintentional transgressions with forgiveness. However, these effects of transgressor intentionality should be found in particular among actors for whom moral identity is central (vs. peripheral). We find support for these predictions in a laboratory experiment and a field study among organizational leaders. By simultaneously studying punishment and forgiveness in organizational settings, we provide crucial insight in their shared motivational bases, as well as into important differences between the two.
惩罚和宽恕是对道德违规行为的两种截然不同的反应,二者都被认为能够恢复组织内的道德秩序认知。不幸的是,目前尚不清楚是什么促使组织行为者惩罚或宽恕违规者。我们以社会认知理论为基础,认为对违规者的惩罚和宽恕都植根于自我调节过程。具体而言,我们认为组织行为者更有可能对故意违规行为做出惩罚反应,而对无意违规行为做出宽恕反应。然而,违规者意图的这些影响尤其会在那些以道德认同为核心(而非边缘)的行为者中出现。我们在一项针对组织领导者的实验室实验和实地研究中为这些预测找到了支持。通过同时研究组织环境中的惩罚和宽恕,我们对它们共同的动机基础以及二者之间的重要差异提供了关键见解。